Importance of spatial structures in advancing hydrological sciences

Water Resources Research

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2006, Pages

  Schulz, K ^a,b   Seppelt, R ^a   Zehe, E ^b   Vogel, H J ^a   Attinger, S ^a  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDROLOGY; MAPPING; MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES; REMOTE SENSING; WATERSHEDS;

HYDROLOGICAL SYSTEMS; MAPPING STRUCTURES; SPATIAL STRUCTURES; SUBSURFACE CHARACTERISTICS;

WATER RESOURCES;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDROLOGY; MAPPING; MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES; REMOTE SENSING; WATER RESOURCES; WATERSHEDS;

EID: 33646516004     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2005WR004301     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Attinger, S. (2003), Generalized coarse graining procedures for flow in porous media, Comput. Geosci., 7, 253-273.
2. Bear, J. (1972), Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media, 764 pp., Elsevier, New York.
3. Beckie, R., A. A. Aldama, and E. F. Wood (1996), Modeling the large-scale dynamics of saturated groundwater flow using spatial-filtering theory: 1. Theoretical development, Water Resour. Res., 32, 1269-1280.
4. Beven, K., J. Freer, B. Hankin, and K. Schulz (2000), The use of generalised likelihood measures for uncertainty estimation in high order models of environmental systems, in Nonlinear and Nonstationary Signal Processing, edited by W. J. Fitzgerald et al., pp. 144-183, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
5. Beven, K., K. Schulz, and S. W. Franks (2001), Functional similarity in hydrological modelling at the landscape scale, paper presented at International Workshop: Modelling of Transport Processes in Soils at Various Scales in Time and Space, Inst. of Land and Water Manage., Katoliek Univ. Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
6. Blöschl, G., and R. B. Grayson (2001), Spatial Patterns in Catchment Hydrology: Observations and Modelling, 416 pp., Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
7. Dagan, G. (1989), Flow and Transport in Porous Formations, Springer, New York.
8. Gelhar, L. W. (1993), Stochastic Subsurface Hydrology, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N. J.
9. Grayson, R. B., A. W. Western, F. H. S. Chiew, and G. Bloschl (1997), Preferred states in spatial soil moisture patterns: Local and nonlocal controls, Water Resour. Res., 33, 2897-2908.
10. Hubbard, S., and Y. Rubin (2005), Introduction to hydrogeophysics, in Hydrogeophysics, edited by Y. Rubin and S. Hubbard, chap. 1, pp. 3-23, Springer, New York.
11. Lin, H. (2003), Hydropedology: Bridging disciplines, scales, and data, Vadose Zone J., 2, 1-11.
12. Lunati, I., S. Attinger, and W. Kinzelbach (2002), Macrodispersivity for transport in arbitrary nonuniform flow fields: Asymptotic and preasymptotic results, Water Resour. Res., 38(10), 1187, doi:10.1029/2001WR001203.
13. Mandelbrot, B. (1982), The Fractal Geometry of Nature, W. H. Freeman, New York.
14. McDonnell, J. J., T. Tanaka, M. J. Mitchell, and N. Ohte (2001), Hydrology and biogeochemistry of forested catchments: Foreword, Hydrol. Processes, 15, 1673-1674.
15. Papanicolaou, G. C., and S. R. S. Varadhan (1981), Boundary value problems with rapidly oscillating random coefficients in random fields, in Rigorous Results in Statistical Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory, edited by J. Fritz et al., pp. 835-873, Elsevier, New York.
16. Reggiani, P., M. Sivapalan, and S. M. Hassanizadeh (1998), A unifying framework for watershed thermodynamics: balance equations for mass, momentum, energy and entropy, and the second law of thermodynamics, Adv. Water Resour., 22, 367-398.
17. Reggiani, P., M. Sivapalan, and S. M. Hassanizadeh (2000), Conservation equations governing hillslope responses: Exploring the physical basis of water balance, Water Resour. Res., 36, 1845-1863.
18. Schulz, K., and K. Beven (2003), Data-supported robust parameterisations in land surface-atmosphere flux predictions: Towards a top-down approach, Hydrol. Processes, 17, 2259-2277.
19. Sivakumar, B. (2001), Is a chaotic multi-fractal approach for rainfall possible?, Hydrol. Processes, 15, 943-955.
20. Vogel, H. J., and K. Roth (1998), A new approach for determining effective soil hydraulic functions, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 49, 547-556.
21. Vogel, H. J., and K. Roth (2003), Moving through scales of flow and transport in soil, J. Hydrol., 272, 95-106.
22. Vogel, H. J., I. Cousin, and K. Roth (2002), Quantification of pore structure and gas diffusion as a function of scale, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 53, 465-473.
23. Vogel, H. J., H. Hoffmann, and K. Roth (2005), Studies of crack dynamics in clay soil. I. Experimental methods, results and morphological quantification, Geoderma, 125, 203-211.
24. Western, A. W., G. Blöschl, and R. W. Grayson (2001), Toward capturing hydrologically significant connectivity in spatial patterns, Water Resour. Res., 37(1), 83-98.
25. Whitaker, S. (1999), The Method of Volume Averaging, Springer, New York.
26. Zehe, E., and G. Blöschl (2004), Predictability of hydrologic response at the plot and catchment scales: Role of initial conditions, Water Resour. Res., 40, W10202, doi: 10.1029/2003WR002869.
27. Zehe, E., H. Lee, and M. Sivapalan (2006), Derivation of closure relations for mesoscale models based on the REW approach, in Predictions in Ungauged Basins: International Perspectives on State-of-the-Art and Pathways Forward, Proceedings of. the Australia-Japan Workshop on PUB Working Groups, edited by S. W. Franks et al., IHAS Press, Wallingford, U. K., in press.