|
Volumn 17, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1645-1651
|
Good work - How is it recognised by the nurse?
|
Author keywords
Clinical competence; Feedback; Job performance; Nurses; Nursing; Quality of work
|
Indexed keywords
ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR;
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
ATTITUDE TO HEALTH;
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
FRUSTRATION;
GESTURE;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE;
HEALTH SERVICE;
HUMAN;
JOB SATISFACTION;
MALE;
MOTIVATION;
NORWAY;
NURSE ATTITUDE;
NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
NURSING ASSESSMENT;
NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH;
NURSING STAFF;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
REWARD;
SELF CONCEPT;
STANDARD;
VERBAL BEHAVIOR;
ADULT;
ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL;
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL;
FRUSTRATION;
GOALS;
HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE;
HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND;
HUMANS;
JOB SATISFACTION;
KINESICS;
MALE;
NORWAY;
NURSE'S ROLE;
NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS;
NURSING ASSESSMENT;
NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH;
NURSING STAFF;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;
QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
REWARD;
SELF EFFICACY;
VERBAL BEHAVIOR;
|
EID: 43849110591
PISSN: 09621067
EISSN: 13652702
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02139.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (20)
|
References (32)
|