Assessment of health-related quality of life after surgical treatment of focal symptomatic spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee

Spine Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 296-304

  Rampersaud, Y Raja ^a   Ravi, Bheesma ^a   Lewis, Stephen J ^a   Stas, Venessa ^a   Barron, Ronald ^a   Davey, Roderick ^a   Mahomed, Nizar ^a  

^a TORONTO WESTERN HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Decompression; Fusion; Health related quality of life; Hip and knee arthroplasty; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Outcomes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF REPORT; SHORT FORM 36; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; SPINE FUSION; STUDENT T TEST; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; HEALTH STATUS; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COHORT STUDIES; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SPINAL STENOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 43749122808     PISSN: 15299430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Power J.D., Perruccio A.V., Desmeules M., Lagace C., and Badley E.M. Ambulatory physician care for musculoskeletal disorders in Canada. J Rheumatol 33 (2006) 133-139
2. Deyo R.A., Gray D.T., Kreuter W., Mirza S., and Martin B.I. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine 30 (2005) 1441-1445 discussion 1446-7
3. Kurtz S., Mowat F., Ong K., Chan N., Lau E., and Halpern M. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (2005) 1487-1497
4. Cowan Jr. J.A., Dimick J.B., Wainess R., Upchurch Jr. G.R., Chandler W.F., and La Marca F. Changes in the utilization of spinal fusion in the United States. Neurosurgery 59 (2006) 15-20 discussion 15-20
5. Weinstein J.N., Lurie J.D., Olson P.R., Bronner K.K., and Fisher E.S. United States' trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992-2003. Spine 31 (2006) 2707-2714
6. Shipton D., Badley E.M., and Mahomed N.N. Critical shortage of orthopaedic services in Ontario, Canada. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A (2003) 1710-1715
7. Gordon M. Challenges of an aging population. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can 35 (2001) 306-308
8. Lavernia C., Lee D.J., and Hernandez V.H. The increasing financial burden of knee revision surgery in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446 (2006) 221-226
9. Jain N.B., Higgins L.D., Ozumba D., et al. Trends in epidemiology of knee arthroplasty in the United States, 1990-2000. Arthritis Rheum 52 (2005) 3928-3933
10. Pedersen A.B., Johnsen S.P., Overgaard S., Soballe K., Sorensen H.T., and Lucht U. Total hip arthroplasty in Denmark: incidence of primary operations and revisions during 1996-2002 and estimated future demands. Acta Orthop 76 (2005) 182-189
11. Mehrotra C., Remington P.L., Naimi T.S., Washington W., and Miller R. Trends in total knee replacement surgeries and implications for public health, 1990-2000. Public Health Rep 120 (2005) 278-282
12. Rasanen P., Ohman J., Sintonen H., et al. Cost-utility analysis of routine neurosurgical spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 5 (2006) 204-209
13. Rivero-Arias O., Campbell H., Gray A., Fairbank J., Frost H., and Wilson-MacDonald J. Surgical stabilisation of the spine compared with a programme of intensive rehabilitation for the management of patients with chronic low back pain: cost utility analysis based on a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 330 (2005) 1239-1245
14. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, HCUPnet. Available:. http://www.ahrg.gov/data/hcup/
15. Neumann P.J., Rosen A.B., and Weinstein M.C. Medicare and cost-effectiveness analysis. NEJM 353 (2005) 1516-1522
16. Ethgen O., Bruyere O., Richy F., Dardennes C., and Reginster J.Y. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A (2004) 963-974
17. Liang M.H., Cullen K.E., Larson M.G., et al. Cost-effectiveness of total joint arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 29 (1986) 937-943
18. Lavernia C.J., Guzman J.F., and Gachupin-Garcia A. Cost effectiveness and quality of life in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 345 (1997) 134-139
19. Norman-Taylor F.H., Palmer C.R., and Villar R.N. Quality-of-life improvement compared after hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78 (1996) 74-77
20. Gibson J.N., and Waddell G. Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis: updated Cochrane Review. Spine 30 (2005) 2312-2320 [review]
21. Amundsen T., Weber H., Nordal H.J., Magnaes B., Abdelnoor M., and Lilleas F. Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study. Spine 25 (2000) 1424-1435 discussion 1435-6
22. Javid M.J., and Hadar E.J. Long-term follow-up review of patients who underwent laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 89 (1998) 1-7
23. Bono C.M., and Lee C.K. The influence of subdiagnosis on radiographic and clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion for degenerative disc disorders: an analysis of the literature from two decades. Spine 30 (2005) 227-234
24. Salaffi F., Carotti M., Stancati A., and Grassi W. Health-related quality of life in older adults with symptomatic hip and knee osteoarthritis: a comparison with matched healthy controls. Aging Clin Exp Res 17 (2005) 255-263
25. Marx R.G., Jones E.C., Atwan N.C., Closkey R.F., Salvati E.A., and Sculco T.P. Measuring improvement following total hip and knee arthroplasty using patient-based measures of outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (2005) 1999-2005
26. Walsh T.L., Hanscom B., Lurie J.D., and Weinstein J.N. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36. Spine 28 (2003) 607-615
27. Population projection. The Daily, Statistics Canada. 2005; December: 5-6.
28. An Aging World 2001, U.S. Department of Commerce, UN Department of Public Information, DP/2264, March 2002.
29. Perruccio A.V., Power J.D., and Badley E.M. Revisiting arthritis prevalence projections-it's more than just the aging of the population. J Rheumatol 33 (2006) 1856-1862
30. Benoist M. The natural history of lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis. Joint Bone Spine 69 (2002) 450-457
31. Zucherman J.F., Hsu K.Y., Hartjen C.A., et al. A multi-center, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X-STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication. Spine 30 (2005) 1351-1358
32. Atlas S.J., Keller R.B., Wu Y.A., Deyo R.A., and Singer D.E. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 30 (2005) 936-943
33. Toyone T., Tanaka T., Kato D., Kaneyama R., and Otsuka M. Patients' expectations and satisfaction in lumbar spine surgery. Spine 30 (2005) 2689-2694
34. Errico T.J., Gatchel R.J., Schofferman J., et al. A fair and balanced view of spine fusion surgery. Spine J 4 (2004) S129-S138
35. Deyo R.A., Nachemson A., and Mirza S.K. Spinal-fusion surgery-the case for restraint. N Engl J Med 350 (2004) 722-726
36. Weinstein J.N., Lurie J.D., Tosteson T.D., et al. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort. JAMA 296 (2006) 2451-2459
37. Sengupta D.K., and Herkowitz H.N. Degenerative spondylolisthesis: review of current trends and controversies. Spine 30 (2005) S71-S81 [review]
38. Mardjetko S.M., Connolly P.J., and Shott S. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a meta-analysis of literature1970-1993. Spine 19 (1994) 2256-2265
39. Turner J.A., Ersek M., Herron L., and Deyo R. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: attempted meta-analysis of literature 1970-93. Spine 17 (1992) 1-8
40. Jansson K.A., Nemeth G., Granath F., and Blomqvist P. Spinal stenosis re-operation rate in Sweden is 11% at 10 years-a national analysis of 9,664 operations. Eur Spine J 14 (2005) 659-663
41. Chang Y., Singer D.E., Wu Y.A., Keller R.B., and Atlas S.J. The effect of surgical and nonsurgical treatment on longitudinal outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis over 10 years. J Am Geriatr Soc 53 (2005) 785-792
42. Iguchi T., Kurihara A., Nakayama J., Sato K., Kurosaka M., and Yamasaki K. Minimum 10-year outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 25 (2000) 1754-1759
43. Kornblum M.B., Fischgrund J.S., Herkowitz H.N., Abraham D.A., Berkower D.L., and Ditkoff J.S. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis. Spine 29 (2004) 726-734
44. Katz J.N., Lipson S.J., Lew R.A., et al. Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or non-instrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes. Spine 22 (1997) 1123-1131
45. Kuntz K.M., Snider R.K., Weinstein J.N., Pope M.H., and Katz J.N. Cost-effectiveness of fusion with and without instrumentation for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. Spine 25 (2000) 1132-1139
46. Fairbank J., Frost H., Wilson-MacDonald J., Yu L.M., Barker K., Collins R., and Spine Stabilisation Trial Group. Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial. BMJ 28 (2005) 1233