|
Volumn 330, Issue 7502, 2005, Pages 1239-1243
|
Surgical stabilisation of the spine compared with a programme of intensive rehabilitation for the management of patients with chronic low back pain: Cost utility analysis based on a randomised controlled trial
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
BEHAVIOR THERAPY;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONFIDENCE INTERVAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
COST;
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
COST UTILITY ANALYSIS;
EMPLOYMENT;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HEALTH CARE;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LOW BACK PAIN;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
MULTICENTER STUDY;
NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SPINE FUSION;
UNITED KINGDOM;
ADULT;
AGED;
CHRONIC DISEASE;
COST OF ILLNESS;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HUMANS;
LOW BACK PAIN;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS;
SPINAL FUSION;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 20344386746
PISSN: 09598146
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38441.429618.8F Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (127)
|
References (10)
|