Biomechanical properties of the condyle created by osteodistraction

Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 87, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 490-494

  Zhu, S ^a   Hu, J ^a   Zou, S ^a   Kakudo, K ^b   Tsunokuma, M ^b  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b OSAKA DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Mandibular condyle; Mechanical properties; Microstructure; Osteodistraction osteogenesis; Reconstruction

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE REGENERATION; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; GOAT; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; MALE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; PLASTIC SURGERY; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE REGENERATION; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; GOATS; MALE; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT;

EID: 43749109824     PISSN: 00220345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/154405910808700503     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bouvier M (1988). Effects of age on the ability of the rat temporomandibular joint to respond to changing functional demands. J Dent Res 67:1206-1212.
2. Ciarelli TE, Fyhrie DP, Schaffler MB, Goldstein SA (2000). Variations in three-dimensional cancellous bone architecture of the proximal femur in female hip fractures and in controls. J Bone Miner Res 15:32-40.
3. Ding M, Odgaard A, Hvid I (1999). Accuracy of cancellous bone volume fraction measured by micro-CT scanning. J Biomech 32:323-326.
4. Ellis E 3rd, Schneiderman ED, Carlson DS (2002). Growth of the mandible after replacement of the mandibular condyle: an experimental investigation in Macaca mulatta. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:1461-1470.
5. Giesen EB, Van Eijden TM (2000). The three-dimensional cancellous bone architecture of the human mandibular condyle. J Dent Res 79:957-963.
6. Giesen EB, Ding M, Dalstra M, van Eijden TM (2001). Mechanical properties of cancellous bone in the human mandibular condyle are anisotropic. J Biomech 34:799-803.
7. Giesen EB, Ding M, Dalstra M, van Eijden TM (2003). Reduced mechanical load decreases the density, stiffness, and strength of cancellous bone of the mandibular condyle. Clin Biomech 18:358-363.
8. Giesen EB, Ding M, Dalstra M, van Eijden TM (2004). Changed morphology and mechanical properties of cancellous bone in the mandibular condyles of edentate people. J Dent Res 83:255-259.
9. Hayes AM (1967). Histologic study of regeneration of the mandibular condyle after unilateral condylectomy in the fat. J Dent Res 46:483-491.
10. Hikiji H, Takato T, Matsumoto S, Mori Y (2000). Experimental study of reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint using a bone transport technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58:1270-1276.
11. Kajikawa A, Hirabayashi S, Harii K (2003). A new vascularized mandible heterotopic transplant model for studies on the growth of condylar cartilage. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:234-238.
12. Karaharju-Suvanto T, Peltonen J, Laitinen O, Kahri A (1996). The effect of gradual distraction of the mandible on the sheep temporomandibular joint. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 25:152-156.
13. Kopperdahl DL, Keaveny TM (1998). Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone. J Biomech 31:601-608.
14. Linde F (1994). Elastic and viscoelastic properties of trabecular bone by a compression testing approach. Dan Med Bull 41:119-138.
15. Linde F, Hvid I, Madsen F (1992). The effect of specimen geometry on the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. J Biomech 25:359-368.
16. Liu ZJ, King GJ, Herring SW (2006). Condylar mineralization following mandibular distraction in rats. J Dent Res 85:653-657.
17. Peltomaki T, Vahatalo K, Ronning O (2002). The effect of a unilateral costochondral graft on the growth of the marmoset mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:1307-1314.
18. Stucki-McCormick SU (1997). Reconstruction of the mandibular condyle using transport distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 8:48-52.
19. Sun ZY, Yang ZW, Yi XZ (1999). [A quantitative study on the orientation of condylar trabeculae in adult goat.] Chinese J Stereol Image Anal 4:174-179 (article in Chinese).
20. Teng S, Herring SW (1996). Anatomic and directional variation in the mechanical properties of the mandibular condyle in pigs. J Dent Res 75:1842-1850.
21. Van Eijden TM, van der Helm PN, van Ruijven LJ, Mulder L (2006). Structural and mechanical properties of mandibular condylar bone. J Dent Res 85:33-37.
22. Zhu SS, Hu J, Li JH, Ying BB (2006). Reconstruction of mandibular condyle by transport distraction osteogenesis: experimental study on rhesus monkey. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:1487-1492.