In vitro comparison of ceramic burs and conventional tungsten carbide bud burs in dentin caries excavation

Quintessence International

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 495-499

  Dammaschke, Till ^a   Vesnić, Aleksandra ^a   Schäfer, Edgar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bud bur; Caries; CeraBur; Ceramic bur; Dentin; Efficiency; Excavation

Indexed keywords

TUNGSTEN CARBIDE; TUNGSTEN DERIVATIVE; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; TIME;

CERAMICS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTIN; HUMANS; TIME FACTORS; TUNGSTEN COMPOUNDS; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 43749095181     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Dammaschke T. Treatment of caries in dentine: Classical bur or minimal-invasive? ZWR 2002;111:659-664.
2. Dammaschke T. Behandlungsalternativen in der Dentinkariesexkavation. In: Heidemann D (ed). Deutscher Zahnärzte Kalender. Köln: DÄV, 2006:1-16.
3. Banerjee A, Kidd EAM, Watson TF. In vitro evaluation of five alternative methods of carious dentine excavation. Caries Res 2000;34:144-150.
4. Silva NRFA, Carvalho RM, Pegoraro LF, Tay FR, Thomson VP. Evaluation of a self-limiting concept in dentinal caries removal. J Dent Res 2006;85:282-286.
5. Pashley EL, Talman R, Horner JA, Pashley DH. Permeability of normal versus carious dentin. Endod Dent Traumatol 1991;7:207-211.
6. Bayerlein T, Proff P, Richter G, Dietze S, Fanghänel J, Gedrange T. The use of ceramic drills on a zirconium oxide basis in bone preparation. Folia Morphol 2006;65:72-74.
7. Whitney ED. Ceramic cutting tools. Norwich, NY: William Andrew, 1994.
8. Kumar AS, Durai AR, Sornakumar T. Wear behaviour of alumina based ceramic cutting tools on machining steel.Tribol Int 2006;39:191-197.
9. Smuk B, Szutkowska M, Walter J. Alumina ceramics with partially stabilized zirconia for cutting tools. J Mater ProcTech 2003;133:195-198.
10. Ma XP, Li GX, Shen L, Jin ZH. Cut behaviour and microstructure of a novel mica glass-ceramic. J lnorg Mater 2004;19:48-52.
11. Kumar AS, Durai AR, Sornakumar T. Performance characteristics of alumina-yttria ceramic cutting tool in machining grey iron. Ind Ceram 2004;24:109-113.
12. Scheutzel P. Possibilities and limitations of Caridex System as an alternative to conventional caries removal. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1989;44:612-614.
13. Ohgushi K, Fusayama T. Electron microscopic structure of two layers of carious dentin. J Dent Res 1975;54:1019-1026.
14. Ohgushi K. Collagen fibres in the two layers of carious dentin. 1. Histochemical study. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi 1973;40:65-74.
15. Böck P (ed). Romeis-Mikroskopische Techniken, ed 17. Munich: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1989.
16. Dammaschke T, Dähne L, Kaup M, Stratmann U, Ott K. Efficacy of Carisolv compared with conventional methods for removing carious dentine. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 2001;56:472-475.
17. Dammaschke T, Eickmeier M, Schäfer E, Danesh G, Ott KHR. Effectiveness of Carisolv compared with sodium hypochlorite and calcium hydroxide. Acta Odontol Scand 2005;63:110-114.
18. Dammaschke T, Rodenberg TN, Schäfer E, Ott KHR. Efficiency of the polymer bur SmartPrep compared with conventional tungsten carbide bud bur in dentin caries excavation. Oper Dent 2006;31:256-260.
19. Banerjee A, Watson TF, Kidd EAM. Dentine caries: Take it or leave it? Dent Update 2000:27:272-276.
20. Bjorndal L, Mjör IA. Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 4: Dental caries-Characteristics of lesions and pulpal reactions. Quintessence Int 2001;32:717-736.
21. Hotz PR. Do carious lesions have to be removed completely? Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2003;113:262-266.