The survival of support rings in complex acetabular revision surgery

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 90, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 574-578

  Carroll, F A ^a,b   Hoad Reddick, D A ^a,c   Kerry, R M ^a   Stockley, I ^a  

^a NORTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b WIRRAL UNIVERSITY TEACHING HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c WRIGHTINGTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; BONE GRAFT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RECURRENT INFECTION; REOPERATION; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; BONE SCREWS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; REOPERATION;

EID: 43649102309     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.19789     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Amstutz HC, Ma SM, Jinnah RH, Mai L. Revision of aseptic loose total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 1982;170:21-33.
2. Hungerford DS, Jones LC. The rationale of cementless revision of cemented arthroplasty failures. Clin Orthop 1998;235:12-24.
3. Schmalzried TP, Kwong LM, Jasty M, et al. The mechanism of loosening of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty: analysis of specimens retrieved at autopsy. Clin Orthop 1992;274:60-78.
4. Sochart DH. Relationship of acetabular wear to osteolysis and loosening in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1999;363:135-50.
5. Hunter GA, Welsh RP, Cameron HU, Bailey WH. The results of revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1979;61-B:419-21.
6. Kavanagh BF, Ilstrup DM, Fitzgerald RH Jr. Revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1985;67-A:517-26.
7. Sporer SM, O'Rourke M, Chong P, Paprosky WG. The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction: average ten-year follow up. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87-A:760-5.
8. O'Rourke MR, Paprosky WG, Rosenberg AG. Use of structural allografts in acetabular revision surgery. Clin Orthop 2004;420:113-21.
9. Slooff TJ, Buma P, Schreurs BW, et al. Acetabular and femoral reconstruction with impacted graft and cement. Clin Orthop 1996;324:108-15.
10. Slooff TJ, Huiskes R, Van Horn J, Lemmens A. Bone grafting in total hip replace ment for acetabular protrusion. Acta Orthop Scand 1984;55:593-6.
11. Berry DJ, Müller ME. Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bony deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992;74-B:711-15.
12. Schatzker J, Glynn MK, Ritter D. A preliminary review of the Müller acetabular and Burch-Schneider anti protrusio support rings. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1984;103:5-12.
13. Saleh KJ, Jaroszynski G, Woodgate I, Saleh L, Gross AE. Revision total hip arthroplasty with the use of structural acetabular allograft and reconstruction ring: a case series with a 10-year average follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2000;15:951-8.
14. Campbell GD, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Reliability of acetabular bone defect classification systems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:83-6.
15. Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: a 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1994;9:33-44.
16. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total knee replacement: incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1973;55-A:1629-32.
17. Schreurs BW, Slooff TJ, Gardeniers JW, Buma P. Acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup: 20 years experience. Clin Orthop 2001;393:202-15.
18. Schreurs BW, Bolder SB, Gardeniers JW, et al. Acetabular revision with impacted morcellised cancellous bone grafting and a cemented cup: a 15- to 20-year follow up. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:492-7.
19. Hedley AK, Gruen TA, Ruoff DP. Revision of failed total hip arthroplasties with uncemented porous-coated anatomic components. Clin Orthop 1988;235:75-90.
20. McGann WA, Welch RB, Picetti GD 3rd. Acetabular preparation in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1998;235:35-46.
21. Oakeshott RD, Morgan DA, Zukor DJ, et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty with osseous allograft reconstruction: a clinical and roentgenographic analysis. Clin Orthop 1987;225:37-61.
22. Springfield DS. Massive autogenous bone grafts. Orthop Clin North Am 1987;18:249-56.
23. Jasty M, Harris WH. Total hip reconstruction using frozen femoral head allografts in patients with acetabular bone loss. Orthop Clin North Am 1987;18:291-9.
24. Mulroy RD Jr, Harris WH. Failure of acetabular autogenous grafts in total hip arthroplasty: increasing incidence: a follow up note. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1990;72-A:1536-40.
25. Gross AE, Goodman S. The current role of structural grafts and cages in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 2004;429:193-200.
26. Zehntner MK, Ganz R. Midterm results (5.5 to 10 years) of acetabular allograft reconstruction with the acetabular reinforcement ring during total hip revision. J Arthroplasty 1994;9:469-79.
27. Young SK, Dorr LD, Kaufman RL, Gruen TA. Factors related to failure of structural bone grafts in acetabular reconstruction of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1991;9(Suppl):73-82.
28. Zmolek JC, Dorr LD. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the use of solid allograft. J Arthroplasty 1993;8:361-70.
29. Perka C, Ludwig R. Reconstruction of segmental defects during revision procedures of the acetabulum with the Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:568-74.
30. Wachtl SW, Jung M, Jakob RP, Gautier E. The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery: a mean follow-up of 12 years. J Arthroplasty 2000;15:959-63.
31. Van Koeveringe AJ, Ochsner PE. Revision cup arthroplasty using Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage. Int Orthop 2002;26:291-5.
32. Rosson J, Schatzker J. The use of reinforcement rings to reconstruct deficient acetabular. Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992;74-B:716-20.
33. Udomkiat P, Dorr LD, Won YY, Longjohn D, Wan Z. Technical factors for success with metal ring acetabular reconstruction. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:961-9.
34. Böhm P, Banzhaf S. Acetabular revision with allograft bone: 103 revisions with 3 reconstruction alternatives, followed for 0.3- 13 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1999;70:240-9.
35. Haddad FS, Shergill N, Muirhead-Allwood SK. Acetabular reconstruction with morcellised allograft and ring support: a medium-term review. J Arthroplasty 1999;14:788-95.
36. Winter E, Piert M, Volkmann R, et al. Allogeneic cancellous bone graft and a Burch-Schneider ring for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2001;83-A:862-7.
37. Pieringer H, Auersperg V, Böhler N. Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone-deficiency: the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:489-96.
38. Schlegel UJ, Bitsch RG, Pritsch M, et al. Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: outcome in 164 hips followed for 2-17 years. Acta Orthop 2006;77:234-41.