Outcome measures for orthopaedic interventions on the hip

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 90, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 545-549

  Ashby, E ^a,c   Grocott, M P W ^a,b   Haddad, F S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS   (United Kingdom)

^b WHITTINGTON HOSPITAL NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHARNLEY SCORE; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP DISABILITY AND OSTEOARTHRITIS OUTCOME SCORE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXFORD HIP SCORE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 43649098841     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.19746     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH. The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events. Health Technol Assess 2001;5:1-194.
2. Bennett-Guerrero E, Welsby I. Dunn TJ, et al. The use of a postoperative morbidity survey to evaluate patients with prolonged hospitalization after routine, moderate-risk, elective surgery. Anesth Analg 1999;89:514-19.
3. Grocott MP, Browne JP, Van der Meulen J, et al. The post-operative morbidity survey was validated and used to describe morbidity after major surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:919-28.
4. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit, Br J Surg 1991;78:355-60.
5. Mohamed K, Copeland GP, Boot DA, et al. An assessment of the POSSUM system in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002;84-B:735-9.
6. Streiner DL. Being inconsistent about consistency: when coefficient alpha does and doesn't matter. J Personality Assessment 2003;80:217-22.
7. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;16:297-334.
8. Dawson J, Doll H, Boller I, et al. The development and validation of a patient-reported questionnaire to assess outcomes of elbow surgery. J Bone J Bone Joint [Br] 2008;90-B:466-73.
9. No authors listed. Study Protocol of the World Health Organization project to develop a quality of life instrument (WHOQOL). Qual Life Res 1993;2:153-9.
10. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I: conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.
11. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34:220-33.
12. Hunt SM, McEwan J. The development of a subjective health indicator. Sociol Health Illn 1980;2:231-46.
13. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current stage of play. Health policy 1996;37:53-72.
14. Kantz JN, Larson MG, Philips CB, Fossel AH, Liang MH. Comparative measurement sensitivity of shorter and longer health status instruments. Med Care 1992;30:917-25.
15. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 1992;305:160-4.
16. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): II. psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993;31:247-63.
17. Feeny D, Wu L, Eng K. Comparing short form 6D, standard gamble, and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 utility scores: results from total hip arthroplasty patients. Qual Life Res 2004;13:1659-70.
18. Mahomed NN, Arndt DC, McGrory BJ, Harris WH. The Harris hip score: comparison of patient self-report with surgeon assessment. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:575-80.
19. Shields RK, Enloe LJ, Leo KC. Health related quality of life in patients with total hip or knee replacement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:572-9.
20. Mangione CM, Goldman L, Orav EJ, et al. Health-related quality of life after elective surgery: measurement of longitudinal changes. J Gen Intern Med 1997;12:686-97.
21. Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Argyle M. The Nottingham Health Profile: an analysis of its sensitivity in differentiating illness groups. Soc Sci Med 1988;27:1411-14.
22. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Hogg-Johnson SA. Measuring health in injured workers: a cross-sectional comparison of five generic health status instruments in workers with musculo-skeletal injuries. Am J Ind Med 1996;29:618-31.
23. Brazier J, Jones N, Kind P. Testing the validity of the EuroQol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaire. Qual Life Res 1993;2:169-80.
24. Van Agt HM, Essink-Bot ML, Krabbe PF, Bonsel GJ. Test-retest reliability of health state valuations collected with the EuroQol questionnaire. Soc Sci Med 1994;39:1537-44.
25. Luo N, Chew LH, Fong KY, et al. Validity and reliability of the EQ-5D self-report questionnaire in English-speaking Asian patients with rheumatic diseases in Singapore. Qual Life Res 2003;12:87-92.
26. Tidermark J, Bergström G, Svensson O, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S. Responsiveness of the Euroqol (EQ 5-D) and the SF-36 in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures. Qual Life Res 2003;12:1069-79.
27. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt L. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically-important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthopaedic Rheumatol 1988;1:95-108.
28. Meenan RF, Gertman PM, Mason JH. Measuring health status in arthritis: the arthritis impact measurement scales. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23:146-52.
29. Bachmeier CJ, March LM, Cross MJ, et al. A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001;9:137-46.
30. Kennedy D, Stratford PW, Pagura SMC, et al. Exploring the factorial validity and clinical interpretability of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Physiotherapy Canada 2003;55:160-8.
31. Stucki G, Sangha O, Stucki S, et al. Comparison of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) osteoarthritis index and a self-report format of the self-administered Lequesne-Algofunctional index in patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1998;6:79-86.
32. Meenan RF, Mason JH, Anderson JJ, Guccione AA, Kazis LE. AIMS2: the content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Health Status Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1992;35:1-10.
33. Lorig K, Chastain RL, Ung E, Shoor S, Holman HR. Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1989;32:37-44.
34. Selman SW. Impact of total hip replacement on quality of life. Orthop Nurs 1989;8:43-9.
35. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty: an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1969;51-A:737-55.
36. Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1972;54-B:61-76.
37. Wright JG, Rudicel S, Feinstein AR. Ask patients what they want: evaluation of individual complaints before total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1994;76-B:229-34.
38. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint [Br] 1996;78-B:185-90.
39. Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klässbo M, Roos EM. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS): validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord 2003;4:10.
40. Söderman P, Malchau H. Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement? Clin Orthop 2001;384:189-97.
41. Ostendorf M, Van Stel HF, Buskens E, et al. Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement: a comparison of five instruments of health status. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:801-8.
42. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Frost S, et al. Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for the assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83-B:1125-9.
43. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery. Qual Health Care 1996;5:81-8.
44. Daley J, Henderson WG, Khuri SF. Risk-adjusted surgical outcomes. Annu Rev Med 2001;52:275-87.
45. Bennett-Guerrero E, Feierman DE, Barclay GR, et al. Preoperative and intraoperative predictors of postoperative morbidity, poor graft function, and early rejection in 190 patients undergoing liver transplantation. Arch Surg 2001;136:1177-83.
46. Wakeling HG, McFall MR, Jenkins CS, et al. Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery. Br J Anaesth 2005;95:634-42.