Digital-image analysis to predict weight and yields of boneless subprimal beef cuts;Análise de imagem digital para a previsão de pesos e rendimentos de cortes de carne bovina

Scientia Agricola

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 403-408

  Teira, Gustavo Adolfo ^a   Tinois, Eduardo ^b   Lotufo, Roberto de Alencar ^b   Felício, Pedro Eduardo de ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE ENTRE RÍOS   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Beef carcass; Beef industry; Fat thickness; Image analysis; Rib eye area

Indexed keywords

EID: 43649098174     PISSN: 01039016     EISSN: 1678992X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0103-90162003000200028     Document Type: Note

References (18)

1. ALBRECHT, E.; WEGNER, J.; ENDER, K. A new technique for objective evaluation of marbling in beef. Fleischwirtschaft, v.4, p.11-16, 1996.
2. BARRERA, J.; BANON, G.J.; LOTUFO, R.A.; HIRATA JR., R. MMach: a mathematical morphology toolbox for the KHOROS system. Journal of Electronic Imaging, v.7, p.174-210, 1998.
3. BEUCHER, S; MEYER, F. The morphological approach to segmentation: the watershed transformation. In: DOUGHERTY, E.R. (Ed.) Mathematical morphology in image processing. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1993. cap.12, p.433-481.
4. BLAND, J.M.; ALTMAN, D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet, v.1, p.307-310, 1986.
5. BORGGAARD, C.; MADSEN, N.T.; THODBERG, H.H. In line image analysis in the slaughter industry, illustrated by beef carcass classification. Meat Science, v.43, p.s151-s163, 1996.
6. CROSS, H.R.; BELK, K.E. Objective measurements of carcass and meat quality. Meat Science, v.36, p.191-202, 1994.
7. CROSS, H.R.; GILLILAND, D.A.; DURLAND, P.R.; SEIDEMAN, S. Beef carcass evaluation by use of a video image analysis system. Journal of Animal Science, v.7, p.908-917, 1983.
8. IRIE M.; IZUMO, A.; MOHRI, S. Rapid method for determining water-holding capacity in meat using video image analysis and simple formulae. Meat Science, v.42, p.95-102, 1996.
9. LI, J.; TAN, J.; MARTZ, F.A.; HEYMANN, H. Image texture features as indicators of beef tenderness. Meat Science, v.53, p.17-22, 1999.
10. LOTUFO, R.; FALCAO, A. The ordered queue and the optimality of the watershed approaches. In: GOUTSIAS, J.; VINCENT, L.; BLOOMBERG, D. (Ed.) Morphology and its application to image and signal processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2000. p.341-350. (Computational Imaging and Vision, 12)
11. MALLOWS, C.L. Some comments on Cp. Technometrics, v.15, p.661-675, 1973.
12. MONIN, G. Recent methods for predicting quality of whole meat. Meat Science, v.49, p.s231-s243, 1998.
13. PIKE, D.J. A practical approach to regression. In: PIGGOT, J.R. (Ed.) Statistical procedures in food research. London: Elsevier Applied Science, 1986. cap.3, p.61-100.
14. SAS INSTITUTE. User’s guide: Statistic. 5.ed. Cary: Statistical Analysis System Institute, 1985. 956p.
15. SCHOLZ, A.; PAULKE, T.; EGER, H. Determining the degree of marbling in the pig. Use of computer-supported video picture analysis. Fleischwirtschaft International, v.1, p.9-11, 1996.
16. SHACKELFORD, S.D.; WHEELER, T.L.; KOOHMARAIE, M. Coupling of image analysis and tenderness classification to simultaneously evaluate carcass cutability, longissimus area, subprimal cut weights, and tenderness of beef. Journal of Animal Science, v.76, p.2631-2640, 1998.
17. SWATLAND, H.J. Objective assessment of meat yield and quality. Trends in Food Science and Technology, v.6, p.117-120, 1995.
18. WASSENBERG, R.L.; ALLEN, D.M.; KEMP, K.E. Video image analysis prediction of total kilograms and percent primal lean and fat yield of beef carcasses. Journal of Animal Science, v.62, p.1609-1616, 1986.