Aboveground biomass allocation and growth of Phragmites australis ramets at four water depths in the Jiuzhaigou Nature Reserve, China

Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 153-157

  Peng, Yulan ^a,b   Tu, Weiguo ^a,b   Bao, Weikai ^a   Gao, Xinfen ^a   Wu, Ning ^a   Luo, Peng ^a   Xiao, Weiyang ^c  

^a CHENGDU INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c Jiuzhaigou National Nature Reserve Administration   (China)

Author keywords

Allometric growth; Biomass allocation; Phragmites australis; Ramet; Reproduction

Indexed keywords

PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS;

EID: 43649089643     PISSN: 1006687X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Dykyjova D, Hradecka D. Production ecology of Phragmites communis: I. Relations of two ecotypes to microclimate and nutrient conditions of habitat. Folia Geobot Phytotax, 1976, 11: 23-61
2. Mook JH, van Der Toorn J. Influence of environmental factors and management on stands of Phragmites australis. II. Effects on yield and its relationships with shoot density. J Appl Ecol, 1982, 19 (2): 501-517
3. Zhang SP, Wang RQ, Zhang ZG, Guo WJ, Liu J, Song BM. Study on morphological variation of Phramites australis in the Yellow River down-stream wetland. Acta Phytoecol Sin, 2003, 27 (1): 78-85
4. Zhao WZ, Chang XL, Li QS, He ZB. Relationship between structural component biomass of reed population and ground water depth in desert oasis. Acta Ecol Sin, 2003, 23 (6): 1138-1146
5. Yang YF, Li JD. Biomass allocation and growth analysis on the ramets of Phragmites communis populations in different habitats in the Songnen plains of China. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2003, 14 (1): 30-34
6. Duan XN, Wang XK, Ouyang ZY, Miao H, Guo R. The biomass of Phragmites australis and its influencing factors in Wuliangsuhai. Acta Phytoecol Sin, 2004, 28 (2): 246-251
7. Clevering OA, Lissner J. Taxonomy, chromosome numbers, clonal diversity and population dynamics of Phragmites australis. Aquat Bot, 1999, 64: 185-208
8. Lieffers VJ, Shay JM. The effects of water level on growth and reproduction of Scirpus mantimus var. paludus. Can J Bot, 1981, 59: 118-121
9. Squires L, van der Valk AG. Water-depth tolerances of the dominant emergent macrophytes of the Delta Marsh, Manitoba. Can J Bot, 1992, 70: 1860-1867
10. Stevenson SC, Lee PF. Ecological relationships of wild rice, Zizania aquatica. 6. The effects of increases in water depth on vegetative and reproductive production. Can J Bot, 1987, 65: 2128-2132
11. Daniels RE, Variation in performance of Phragmites australis in experimental culture. Aquat Bot, 1991, 42 (1): 41-48
12. Coops H, van den Brink FWB, van der Velde G. Growth and morphological responses of four helophyte species in an experimental water - depth gradient. Aquat Bot, 1996, 54 (1): 11-24
13. Weisner SEB, Strand JA. Rhizome architecture in Phragmites australis in relation to water depth: implications for within-plant oxygen transport distance. Folia Ceobot Phytotax, 1996, 31: 91-97
14. Gai P, Bao ZJ, Zhang JJ, Qin YF. The grey analysis of effects of environment factors on aboveground biomass of Phramites communis. J Northeast Norm Univ Nat Sci Ed, 2002, 34 (3): 87-91
15. Hanganu J, Mihail G, Coops H. Responses of ecotypes of Phragmites australis to increased seawater influence: A field study in the Danube Delta, Romania. Aquat Bot, 1999, 64 (3-4): 351-358
16. Hardej M, Ozimek T. The effect of sewage sludge flooding on growth and morphometric parameters of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel. Ecol Engin, 2002, 18 (3): 343-350
17. Vretare V, Stefan EB, Weisner JA, Granéli W. Phenotypic plasticity in Phragmites australis as a functional response to water depth. Aquat Bot, 2001, 69 (2-4): 127-145
18. White SD, George G. A comparison of the morphology, gas space anatomy and potential for internal aeration in Phragmites australis under variable and static water regimes. Aquat Bot, 2002, 73 (2): 115-127
19. Grace JB. Effects of water depth on Typha latifolia and Typha domingensis. Am J Bot, 1989, 76 (5): 762-768
20. Hayball N, Pearce M. Influences of simulated grazing and water-depth on the growth of juvenile Bolboschoenus caldwellii, Phragmites australis and Schoenoplectus validus plants. Aquat Bot, 2004, 78 (3): 233-242
21. Koppitz H, Kuhl H, Kohl JG. Differences in morphology and C/N balance between clones of Phragmites australis within a plantation at a degraded fen. Folia Geobot, 2000, 35: 389-402
22. Engloner AI. Annual growth dynamics and morphological differences of reed (Phragmites australis [Cav.] Trin. ex Steudel) in relation to water supply. Flora, 2004, 199 (3): 256-262
23. Bloom AJ, Chapin III FS, Mooney HA. Resource limitation in plants - an economic analogy. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 1985, 16: 363-392
24. Chapin FS, Bloom A J, Field CB, Waring RH. Plant responses to multiple environment factors. Bioscience, 1987, 37 (1): 49-57
25. Dewar RC. A root - shoot partitioning model based on carbon - nitrogen - water interrelations and Münch phloem flow. Func Ecol, 1993, 7: 356-368
26. Hubert DW. Optimization of plant root-shoot ratios and internal nitrogen concentrations. Ann Bot, 1990, 66 (1): 91-99
27. Robinson D. Compensatory changes in the partitioning of dry matter in relation to nitrogen uptake and optimal variations in growth. Ann Bot, 1986, 58 (6): 841-848
28. Datta SC. Ecology of plant population II. Reproduction. In: Gopal B ed. Ecology and Management of Aquatic Vegetation in the Indian Subcontinent. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990. 126-146