Genetic and morphological analysis of floral homeotic mutants tepal-like bract and fagopyrum apetala of Fagopyrum esculentum

Botany

Volumn 86, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 367-375

  Logacheva, Maria D ^a   Fesenko, Ivan N ^b   Fesenko, Aleksey N ^b   Penin, Aleksey A ^a  

^a MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^b All Russia Research Institute of Grain Legumes and Groats Crops   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

ABC model; Fagopyrum; Flower development; Homeosis; Homeotic mutants

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; GENETIC ENGINEERING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

FAGOPYRUM; FLOWER DEVELOPMENT; HOMEOSIS; HOMEOTIC MUTANTS;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

CEREAL; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION; FLOWERING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE;

ANTIRRHINUM; ANTIRRHINUM MAJUS; ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; FAGOPYRUM; FAGOPYRUM ESCULENTUM; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 43549120479     PISSN: 19162804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/B08-010     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bao, X., Franks, R.G., Levin, J.Z., and Liu, Z. 2004. Repression of AGAMOUS by BELLRINGER in floral and inflorescence meristems. Plant Cell, 16: 1478-1489. doi:10.1105/tpc.021147. PMID:15155890.
2. Bateson, W. 1894. Materials for the study of variation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
3. Baum, D.A., Doebley, J., Irish, V.F., and Kramer, E.M. 2002. Response: missing links: the genetic architecture of flower and floral diversification. Trends Plant Sci. 7: 31-34. doi:10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02181-1.
4. Bowman, J.L., Smyth, D.R., and Meyerowitz, E.M. 1989. Genes directing flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 1: 37-52. doi:10.1105/tpc.1.1.37. PMID:2535466.
5. Bowman, J.L., Alvarez, J., Weigel, D., Meyerowitz, E.M., and Smyth, D.R. 1991a. Control of flower development in Arabidopsis thaliana by APETALA1 and interacting genes. Development, 119: 721-743.
6. Bowman, J.L., Smyth, D.R., and Meyerowitz, E.M. 1991b. Genetic interactions among floral homeotic genes of Arabidopsis. Development, 112: 1-20. PMID:1685111.
7. Bradley, D., Carpenter, R., Sommer, H., Hartley, N., and Coen, E. 1993. Complementary floral homeotic phenotypes result from opposite orientations of a transposon at the plena locus of Antirrhinum. Cell, 72: 85-95. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90052-R. PMID:8093684.
8. Campbell, G.C. 1997. Buckwheat Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. Vol. 19. Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben / International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy.
9. Coen, E.S., and Meyerowitz, E.M. 1991. The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature (London), 353: 31-37. doi:10.1038/353031a0. PMID:1715520.
10. Dhawan, O.P., Dubey, M.K., and Khanuja, S.P.S. 2007. Detection of a true breeding homeotic gene mutant pps-1 with partially petaloid sepals in opium poppy (Papaver somniferum L.) and its genetic behavior. J. Hered. 98: 373-377. doi:10.1093/jhered/esm037. PMID:17621590.
11. Drews, G.N., Bowman, J.L., and Meyerowitz, E.M. 1991. Negative regulation of the Arabidopsis homeotic gene AGAMOUS by the APETALA2 product. Cell, 65: 991-1002. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90551-9. PMID:1675158.
12. Fesenko, I.N., Fesenko, N.N., and Ohnishi, O. 2001. Compatibility and congruity of interspecific crosses in Fagopyrum. Advances in Buckwheat Research. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Buckwheat. 30 August - 2 September 2001. Chunchon, Korea. Kangwon National University Press, Chunchon, Korea. pp. 404-410.
13. Fesenko, A.N., Fesenko, I.N., Logacheva, M.D., and Penin, A.A. 2005. The role of gene TEPAL-LIKE BRACT (TLB) in the separation between the bracts and perianth in Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Russ. J. Genet. 41: 1361-1365. doi:10.1007/s11177-006-0007-6.
14. Franks, R.G., Wang, C., Levin, J.Z., and Liu, Z. 2002. SEUSS, a member of a novel family of plant regulatory proteins, represses floral homeotic gene expression with LEUNIG. Development, 129: 253-263. PMID:11782418.
15. Geuten, K., Becker, A., Kaufmann, K., Caris, P., Janssens, S., Viaene, T., Theissen, G., and Smets, E. 2006. Petaloidy and petal identity MADS-box genes in the balsaminoid genera Impatiens and Marcgravia. Plant J. 47: 501-518. PMID:16856983.
16. Haughn, G.W., and Somerville, C.R. 1988. Genetic control of morphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Dev. Genet. 9: 73-89. doi:10.1002/dvg.1020090202.
17. He, C., Münster, T., and Saedler, H. 2004. On the origin of floral morphological novelties. FEBS Lett. 567: 147-151. doi:10.1016/j.febslet. 2004.02.090. PMID:15165908.
18. Hong, S.P. 2001. Tepal surface micromorphology in the genus Fagopyrum Mill. (Polygonaceae) and its systematic implication. Advances in Buckwheat Research. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Buckwheat, 30 August - 2 September 2001, Chunchon, Korea. Kangwon National University Press, Chunchon, Korea.. pp. 264-270.
19. Hong, S.P., Ronse De Craene, L.P., and Smets, E. 1998. Systematic significance of tepal surface morphology in tribes Persicarieae and Polygoneae (Polygonaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 127: 91-116. doi:10.1006/bojl.1997. 0162.
20. Kalivas, A., Pasentsis, K., Polidoros, A.N., and Tsaftaris, A.S. 2007. Heterotopic expression of B-class floral homeotic genes PISTILLATA/GLOBOSA supports a modified model for crocus (Crocus sativus L.) flower formation. DNA Seq. 18: 120-130. doi:10.1080/10425170601060582. PMID:17364823.
21. Kanno, A., Saeki, H., Kameya, T., Saedler, H., and Theissen, G. 2003. Heterotopic expression of class B floral homeotic genes supports a modified ABC model for tulip (Tulipa gesneriana). Plant Mol. Biol. 52: 831-841. doi:10.1023/A:1025070827979. PMID:13677470.
22. Krizek, B.A., and Fletcher, J.C. 2005. Molecular mechanisms of flower development: an armchair guide. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6: 688-698. doi:10.1038/nrg1675. PMID:16151374.
23. Krizek, B.A., and Meyerowitz, E.M. 1996. The Arabidopsis homeotic genes APETALA3 and PISTILLATA are sufficient to provide the B class organ identity function. Development, 122: 11-22. PMID:8565821.
24. Kunst, L., Klenz, J.E., Martinez-Zapater, J., and Haughn, G.W. 1989. AP2 gene determines the identity of perianth organs in flowers of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell, 1: 1195-1208. doi:10.1105/tpc.1.12.1195. PMID:12359889.
25. Kuznetsova, T.V., Pryakhina, N.I., and Yakovlev, G.P. 1992. Sotsvetiya. Morfologicheskaya klassifikatsiya (Inflorescences: Morphological Classification). Khim.-Farm. Inst. St. Petersburg, USSR.
26. Laubengayer, R.A. 1937. Studies in the anatomy and morphology of the polygonaceous flower. Am. J. Bot. 24: 329-343. doi:10.2307/2437032.
27. Lenhard, M., Bohnert, A., Jurgens, G., and Laux, T. 2001. Termination of stem cell maintenance in Arabidopsis floral meristems by interactions between WUSCHEL and AGAMOUS. Cell, 105: 805-814. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00390-7. PMID:11440722.
28. Liu, Z., and Meyerowitz, E.M. 1995. LEUNIG regulates AGAMOUS expression in Arabidopsis flowers. Development, 121: 975-991. PMID:7743940.
29. Mizukami, Y., and Ma, H. 1992. Ectopic expression of the floral homeotic gene AGAMOUS in transgenic Arabidopsis plants alters floral organ identity. Cell, 71: 119-131. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90271-D. PMID:1356630.
30. Mizukami, Y., and Ma, H. 1997. Determination of Arabidopsis floral meristem identity by AGAMOUS. Plant Cell, 9: 393-408. doi:10.1105/tpc.9.3.393. PMID:9090883.
31. Nagasawa, N., Miyoshi, M., Sano, Y., Satoh, H., Hirano, H., Sakai, H., and Nagato, Y. 2003. SUPERWOMAN1 and DROOPING LEAF genes control floral organ identity in rice. Development, 130: 705-718. doi:10.1242/dev.00294. PMID:12506001.
32. Nakamura, T., Fukuda, T., Nakano, M., Hasebe, M., Kameya, T., and Kanno, A. 2005. The modified ABC model explains the development of the petaloid perianth of Agapanthus praecox ssp. orientalis (Agapanthaceae) flowers. Plant Mol. Biol. 58: 435-445. doi:10.1007/s11103-005-5218-z. PMID:16021405.
33. Ohsako, T., Yamane, K., and Ohnishi, O. 2002. Two new Fagopyrum (Polygonaceae) species, F. gracilipedoides and F. jinshaense from Yunnan, China. Genes Genet. Syst. 77: 399-408. doi:10.1266/ggs.77.399. PMID:12589075.
34. Ordidge, M., Chiurugwi, T., Tooke, F., and Battley, N.H. 2005. LEAFY, TERMINAL FLOWER1 and AGAMOUS are functionally conserved but do not regulate terminal flowering and floral determinacy in Impatiens balsamina. Plant J. 44: 985-1000. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02607. x. PMID:16359391.
35. Park, J.H., Ishikawa, Y., Yoshida, R., Kanno, A., and Kameya, T. 2003. Expression of AODEF, a B-functional MADS-box gene, in stamens and inner tepals of the dioecious species Asparagus officinalis L. Plant Mol. Biol. 51: 867-875. doi:10.1023/A:1023097202885. PMID:12777047.
36. Pnueli, L., Hareven, D., Rounsley, S.D., Yanofsky, M.F., and Lifschitz, E. 1994. Isolation of the tomato AGAMOUS gene TAG1 and analysis of its homeotic role in transgenic plants. Plant Cell, 6: 163-173. doi:10.1105/tpc.6.2.163. PMID:7908549.
37. Quinet, M., Cawoy, V., Lefevre, I., Van Miegroet, F., Jacquemart, A., and Kinet, J. 2004. Inflorescence structure and control of flowering time and duration by light in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). J. Exp. Bot. 55: 1509-1517. doi:10.1093/jxb/erh164. PMID:15208346.
38. Ronse De Craene, L.P. 2007. Are petals sterile stamens or bracts? The origin and evolution of petals in the core eudicots. Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 100: 621-630. doi:10.1093/aob/mcm076. PMID:17513305.
39. Ronse De Craene, L.P., Hong, S.P., and Smets, E. 2000. Systematic significance of fruit morphology and anatomy in tribes Persicarieae and Polygoneae (Polygonaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 134: 301-337. doi:10.1006/bojl.2000.0375.
40. Schwarz-Sommer, Z., Huijser, P., Nacken, W., Saedler, H., and Sommer, H. 1990. Genetic control of flower development: homeotic genes in Antirrhinum majus. Science (Wash.), 250: 931-936. doi:10.1126/science.250.4983. 931. PMID:17746916.
41. Smith-Huerta, N.L. 1992. A comparison of floral development in wild type and a homeotic sepaloid petal mutant of Clarkia tembloriensis (Onagraceae). Am. J. Bot. 79: 1423-1430. doi:10.2307/2445142.
42. Soltis, D.E., Chanderbali, A.S., Kim, S., Buzgo, M., and Soltis, P.S. 2007. The ABC model and its applicability to basal angiosperms. Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 100: 155-163. doi:10.1093/aob/mcm117. PMID:17616563.
43. Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Albert, V.A., Oppenheimer, D.G., dePamphilis, C.W., Ma, H., Frohlich, M.W., and Theissen, G. 2002. Missing links: the genetic architecture of flower and floral diversification. Trends Plant Sci. 7: 22-31. doi:10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02098-2. PMID:11804823.
44. van Tunen, A.J., Eikelboom, W., and Angenent, G.C. 1993. Floral organogenesis in Tulipa. Flowering Newsletter, 16: 33-37.
45. Webster, M.A., and Gilmartin, P.A. 2003. A comparison of early floral ontogeny in wild-type and floral homeotic mutant phenotypes of Primula. Planta, 216: 903-917. PMID:12687358.
46. Weigel, D., and Meyerowitz, E.M. 1994. The ABCs of floral homeotic genes. Cell, 78: 203-209. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90291-7. PMID:7913881.
47. Yurtseva, O.V. 2006. Inflorescence structure of Polygonaceae. Bulletin of Moscow Society of Naturalists, Biological series, 111(2): 48-62.