Inflorescence structure and control of flowering time and duration by light in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench)

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 55, Issue 402, 2004, Pages 1509-1517

  Quinet, Muriel ^a   Cawoy, Valérie ^a   Lefèvre, Isabelle ^a   Van Miegroet, Françoise ^a   Jacquemart, Anne Laure ^a   Kinet, Jean Marie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Buckwheat; Fagopyrum esculentum; Floral morph; Flowering duration; Light irradiance; Photoperiod; Reproductive structures

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; FLUORESCENCE; GENETIC ENGINEERING; IRRADIATION;

INFLORESCENCE; MORPHOGENESIS;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL RHYTHM; DIPLOIDY; FAGOPYRUM; FLOWER; FRANCE; GEOGRAPHY; LIGHT; MERISTEM; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIATION EXPOSURE;

BIOLOGICAL CLOCKS; DIPLOIDY; FAGOPYRUM; FLOWERS; FRANCE; GEOGRAPHY; LIGHT; MERISTEM;

BODIANUS; FAGOPYRUM; FAGOPYRUM ESCULENTUM;

EID: 3242695345     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erh164     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Asumadu H, Summerfield RJ, Ellis RH, Qi A. 1998. Variations in the durations of the photoperiod-sensitive and photoperiod-insensitive phases of post-first flowering development in maturity isolines of soyabean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Annals of Botany 82, 773-778.
2. Bahadur B, Laxmi SB, Swamy NR. 1984. Pollen morphology and heterostyly. A systematic and critical account. Advances in Pollen Spore Research 12, 79-129.
3. Barrett SCH. 1992. Heterostylous genetic polymorphisms: model systems for evolutionary analysis. In: Barrett SCH, ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1-24.
4. Campbell CG. 1997. Buckwheat: Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops, Vol. 19. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.
5. Dalby R. 2000. Classic American honey plants: buckwheat. American Bee Journal 140, 485-486.
6. Feldheim W, Wisker E. 1997. Buckwheat in human nutrition. Deutsche Lebensmittel Rundschau 93, 49-52.
7. Funatsuki H, Maruyama-Funatsuki W, Fujino K, Agatsuma M. 2000. Ripening habit of buckwheat. Crop Science 40, 1103-1108.
8. Ganders FR. 1979. The biology of heterostyly. New Zealand Journal of Botany 17, 607-635.
9. Greyson RI. 1994. The development of flowers. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Hagiwara M, Inoue N, Matano T. 1998. Variability in the length of flower bud differentiation period of common buckwheat. Fagopyrum 15, 55-64.
11. Hao X, Li G, Yang W, Zhou N, Lin R, Zhou M. 1995. The difference and classification of light reaction of buckwheat under different treatments of light duration. In: Matano T, Ujihara A, eds. Current advances in buckwheat research. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Buckwheat, August 24-29, 1995. Shinshu: Shinshu University Press, 541-549.
12. Iliadis C. 2001. Evaluation of six chickpea varieties for seed yield under autumn and spring sowing. Journal of Agricultural Science 137, 439-444.
13. Kachonpadungkitti Y, Romchatngoen S, Hasegawa K, Hisajima S. 2001. In vitro cross breeding. In vitro flowering and pollination in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) plants. In: Ham SS, Choi YS, Kim NS, Park CH, eds. Current advances in buckwheat research. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Buckwheat, August 30-September 2, 2001. Chunchon: Organizing Committee of the Eighth International Symposium on Buckwheat under the auspices of the International Buckwheat Research Association, 351-360.
14. Kinet JM, Sachs RM, Bernier G. 1985. The physiology of flowering, Vol. III. The development of flowers. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
15. Lachmann S, Adachi T. 1990. Studies of the influence of photoperiod and temperature on floral traits in buckwheat Fagopyrum esculentum Moench under controlled stress conditions. Plant Breeding 105, 248-253.
16. Lee HB, Kim SL, Park CH. 2001. Productivity of whole plant and rutin content under the different photoperiods in buckwheat. In: Ham SS, Choi YS, Kim NS, Park CH, eds. Current advances in buckwheat research. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Buckwheat, August 30-September 2, 2001. Chunchon: Organizing Committee of the Eighth International Symposium on Buckwheat, under the auspices of the International Buckwheat Research Association, 79-83.
17. Lewis D, Jones DA. 1992. The genetics of heterostyly. In: Barrett SCH, ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 129-148.
18. Li HY, Guo ZF, Zhu YX. 1998. Molecular cloning and analysis of a pea cDNA that is expressed in darkness and very rapidly induced by gibberellic acid. Molecular and General Genetics 259, 393-397.
19. Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1992. The selection of heterostyly. In: Barrett SCH, ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 179-205.
20. Marshall HG, Pomeranz Y. 1982. Buckwheat: description, breeding, production and utilization. In: Pomeranz Y, ed. Advances in cereal science and technology, Vol. V. St Paul, Minnesota: American Association of Cereal Chemists Incorporated, 157-210.
21. Michiyama H, Arikuni M, Hirano T, Hayashi H. 2003. Influence of day length before and after the start of anthesis on the growth, flowering and seed-setting in common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Plant Production Science 6, 235-242.
22. Michiyama H, Fukui A, Hayashi H. 1998. Differences in the progression of successive flowering between summer and autumn ecotype cultivars in common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Japanese Journal of Crop Science 67, 498-504.
23. Michiyama H, Hayashi H. 1998. Differences of growth and development between summer and autumn-type cultivars in common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Japanese Journal of Crop Science 67, 323-330.
24. Michiyama H, Tachimoto A, Hayashi H. 1999. Effect of defloration and restriction of the number of flower clusters on the progression of successive flowering and seed-setting in common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Japanese Journal of Crop Science 68, 91-94.
25. Minami H, Namai H. 1986. Populational change in flowering time caused by different harvesting date observed in a late-summer type cultivar Miyazakizairai of buckwheat Fagopyrum esculentum. Japanese Journal of Breeding 36, 155-162.
26. Murfet IC. 1985. Pisum sativum. In: Halevy AH, ed. Handbook of flowering, Vol. IV. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 97-126.
27. Nagatomo T, Adachi T. 1985. Fagopyrum esculentum. In: Halevy AH, ed. Handbook of flowering, VoI III. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1-8.
28. Oomah BD, Mazza G. 1996. Flavonoids and antioxidative activities in buckwheat. Agricultural and Food Chemistry 44, 1746-1750.
29. Reid JB, Murfet IC, Singer SR, Weller JL, Taylor SA. 1996. Physiological-genetics of flowering in Pisum. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 7, 455-463.
30. Reid JB. 1980. Apical senescence in Pisum: a direct or indirect role for the flowering genes? Annals of Botany 45, 195-201.
31. Ru YJ, Fortune JA. 1999. Effect of grazing intensity and cultivar on morphology, phenology, and nutritive value of subterranean clover. 1. Morphology and phenology of subterranean clover during the growing season. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 1191-1201.
32. Saitoh K, Kimura M, Kuroda T. 1998. Effects of isolation treatment of a node on flowering and pod set in field-grown soybean. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 67, 337-341.
33. Santo-Tomas N, Ledent JF. 1998. Evolution of flowering and ripening within inflorescences of buckwheat plants. In: Campbell C, Przybylski R, eds. Current advances in buckwheat research. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Buckwheat, 12-14 August 1998, Vol. I. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Organizing Committee of the Seventh International Symposium on Buckwheat under the auspices of the International Buckwheat Research Association, 266-269.
34. Seddigh M, Jolliff GD. 1994. Light intensity effects on meadowfoam growth and flowering. Crop Science 34, 497-503.
35. Singer SR, Hsiung LP, Huber SC. 1990. Determinate (det) mutant of Pisum sativum (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae) exhibits an indeterminate growth pattern. American Journal of Botany 77, 1330-1335.
36. Stevens NE. 1912. Observations of heterostylous plants. Botanical Gazette 3, 277-308.
37. Tahir I, Farooq S. 1991. Growth pattern in buckwheat (Fagopyrum spp.) grown in Kashmir. Fagopyrum 11, 63-67.
38. Taylor SA, Murfet IC. 1994. A short day mutant in pea is deficient in the floral stimulus. Flowering Newsletter 18, 39-43.
39. Upadhyaya HD, Ortiz R, Bramel PJ, Singh S. 2002. Phenotypic diversity for morphological and agronomic characteristics in chickpea core collection. Euphytica 123, 333-342.
40. Zhu YX, Zhang YF, Luo JC, Davies JP, Ho DTH. 1998. PPF-1, a post-floral-specific gene expressed in short-day-grown G2 pea, may be important for its never-senescing phenotype. Gene 208, 1-6.