Member checking in human geography: Interpreting divergent understandings of performativity in a student space

Area

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 184-193

  Turner, Sarah ^a   Coen, Stephanie E ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canada; Member checking; Performativity; Qualitative methods; Rigour; Students

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH; HUMAN GEOGRAPHY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; STUDENT;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 43449135045     PISSN: 00040894     EISSN: 14754762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00802.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alkin M C, Daillak R and White P 1979 Using evaluations Sage, Beverley Hills CA
2. Anfara Jr V A, Brown K M and Mangione T L 2002 Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public Educational Researcher 31 28-38
3. Ball S 1984 Beachside reconsidered: Reflections on a methodological apprenticeship in Burgess R G.ed The research process in educational settings Falmer Press, London 69-96
4. Barbour R S 2003 The newfound credibility of qualitative research? Tales of technical essentialism and co-option Qualitative Health Research 13 1019-27
5. Baxter J and Eyles J 1997 Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: Establishing 'rigour'in interview analysis Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 22 505-25
6. Baxter J and Eyles J 1999a The utility of in-depth interviews for studying the meaning of environmental risk Professional Geographer 51 307-20
7. Baxter J and Eyles J 1999b Prescription for research practice? Grounded theory in qualitative evaluation Area 31 179-81
8. Bell D, Binnie J, Cream J and Valentine G 1994 All hyped up and no place to go Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 1 31-47
9. Bloor M 1978 Analysis of observational data: Discussion of worth and uses of inductive techniques and respondent validation Sociology 12 545-52
10. Bloor M.1983 Notes on member validation.in Emerson R M ed Contemporary field research Little Brown and Co., Boston 156-72
11. Bloor M 2001 Techniques of validation in qualitative research: A critical commentary in Emerson R M ed Contemporary field research: perspectives and formulations 2nd edn Waveland Press Inc., Prospect Heights IL 383-95
12. Bradshaw M 2001 Contracts and member checks in qualitative research in human geography: Reason for caution? Area 33 202-11
13. Bryman A E 2003 Member validation Encyclopaedia of social science research methods Online Sage (http://www.referenceworld.com/sage/ socialscience/mem_valid.pdf) Accessed 19 June 2006
14. Butler J 1990 Gender trouble Routledge, New York
15. Butler J 1993a Bodies that matter Routledge, New York
16. Butler J 1993b Critically queer GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 1 17-32
17. Creswell J W and Miller D L 2000 Determining validity in qualitative inquiry Theory into Practice 39 124-30
18. Emerson R M and Pollner M 1988 On the uses of members'responses to researchers'accounts Human Organization 47 189-98
19. Evans R 2005 'You questioning my manhood, boy?'Using work to play with gender roles in a regime of male skilled-labour in van Hoven B Hörschelmann K eds Spaces of masculinities Routledge, London 193-204
20. Guba E G and Lincoln Y S 1989 Fourth generation evaluation Sage, London
21. Lincoln Y S and Guba E G 1985 Naturalistic inquiry Sage, London
22. Lloyd M 1999 Performativity, parody, politics Theory, Culture and Society 16 195-213
23. Manderson D and Turner S 2006 Coffee House: Habitus and performativity among law students Law and Social Inquiry 31 649-76
24. McDowell L 1994 Performing work: Bodily representations in merchant banks Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 12 727-50
25. McDowell L 1997 Capital culture: Gender at work in the city Blackwell, Oxford
26. McDowell L 2005 The men and the boys: Bankers, burger makers and barmen in van Hoven B and Hörschelmann K eds Spaces of masculinities Routledge, London 19-30
27. Morse J M 1998 Validity by committee Qualitative Health Research 8 443-5
28. Nelson L 1999 Bodies (and spaces) do matter: The limits of performativity Gender, Place and Culture 6 331-53
29. Papadopoulos I, Scanlon K and Lees S 2002 Reporting and validating research findings through reconstructed stories Disability & Society 17 269-81
30. Parker A and Sedgwick E 1993 Performativity and performance Routledge, New York
31. Patton M Q 2002 Transaction models: Responsive and illuminative evaluation in Qualitative research and evaluation methods 3rd edn Sage, Thousand Oaks CA 171-6
32. Pratt G 2004 Working feminism Temple University Press, Philadelphia PA
33. Rose G 1999 Performing space in Massey D, Allen J and Sarre P eds Human geography today Polity Press, Cambridge 247-58
34. Sandelowski M 1993 Rigor or rigor mortis: The problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited Advances in Nursing Science 16 1-8
35. Schatzman L and Strauss A L 1973 Strategies for communicating the research in Field research: Strategies for a natural sociology Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ 128-38
36. Schwandt T A 1997 Qualitative inquiry: A dictionary of terms Sage, Thousand Oaks CA 88-9
37. Seale C 1999 The quality of qualitative research Sage, Thousand Oaks CA 52-72
38. Turner S and Manderson D 2007 Socialisation in a space of law: Student performativity at 'Coffee House'in a university law faculty Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25 761-82
39. Whyte W F 1979 On making the most of participant observation American Sociologist 14 56-66