Emissions trading beyond Europe: Linking schemes in a post-Kyoto world

Energy Economics

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 2028-2049

  Anger, Niels ^a  

^a CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN ECONOMIC RESEARCH ZEW   (Germany)

Author keywords

Clean development mechanism; Emissions trading; EU ETS; Kyoto Protocol

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY POLICY; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS;

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM; EMISSIONS TRADING; KYOTO PROTOCOL;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

ABATEMENT COST; CARBON EMISSION; CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM; ECONOMIC IMPACT; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; EUROPEAN UNION; KYOTO PROTOCOL;

EURASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 43449130701     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anger N., Böhringer C., Lange A., 2006. Differentiation of green taxes: a political-economy analysis for Germany. ZEW discussion paper 06-003, Mannheim.
2. Anger N., Böhringer C., Moslener U., 2007. Macroeconomic impacts of the clean development mechanism: the role of investment barriers and regulations, ZEW discussion paper No. 07-026, Mannheim.
3. Bernard A., Paltsev S., Reilly J.M., Vielle M., and Viguier L. Russia's Role in the Kyoto Protocol. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 98. Cambridge, MA (2003)
4. Böhringer C., and Löschel A. Risk and uncertainty in project-based emission crediting. In: Van Ierland E.C., Weikard H.P., and esseler J. (Eds). Risk and Uncertainty in Environmental and Resource Economics, Conference Proceedings, 5-7 June 2002 (2002), Wageningen University, Wageningen
5. Böhringer C., and Rutherford T.F. Carbon abatement and international spillovers. Environmental and Resource Economics 22 3 (2002) 391-417
6. Böhringer C., Hoffmann T., Lange A., Löschel A., and Moslener U. Assessing emission regulation in Europe: an interactive simulation approach. Energy Journal 26 4 (2005) 1-22
7. Böhringer C., Moslener U., Sturm B., in press. Hot Air for sale: a quantitative assessment of Russia's near-term climate policy options. Environmental and resource economics. doi:10.1007/s10640-007-9089-4.
8. CEPA Environmental Registry. Notice of intent to regulate greenhouse gas emissions by large final emitters. Canada Gazette 139 29 (2005) (Part I)
9. Commonwealth of Australia. Australia's Third National Communication on Climate Change (2002), Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/ausnc3.pdf Available at: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/ausnc3.pdf
10. Council of the EU. European Council Brussels, 22 and 23 March 2005, Presidency Conclusions, 7619/05 (2005), European Union, Brussels. http://ue.eu.int/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/84335.pdf Available at: http://ue.eu.int/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/84335.pdf
11. 2 emission reductions, geographical flexibility and concrete ceilings: an assessment using the POLES model. Energy policy 27 10 (1999) 585-601
12. EU, 1999. Preparing for implementation of the Kyoto Protocol, COM 230 (1999), Annex 1. EU Council of Ministers, Commission Communication. Available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/docum/pdf/99230_en.pdf
13. EU. Directive Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading within the Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (2003), European Commission, Brussels. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2003/l_275/l_27520031025en00320046.pdf Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2003/l_275/l_27520031025en00320046.pdf
14. EU. Directive 2004/101/EC, Amending Directive 2003/87/EC Establishing A Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Within the Community, in Respect of the Kyoto Protocol's Project Mechanisms (2004), European Commission, Brussels. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2004/l_338/l_33820041113en00180023.pdf Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2004/l_338/l_33820041113en00180023.pdf
15. EU. Further Guidance on Allocation Plans for the 2008 to 2012 Trading Period of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, COM(2005) 703 Final (2005), European Commission, Brussels. http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/climat/pdf/nap_2_guidance_en.pdf Available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/climat/pdf/nap_2_guidance_en.pdf
16. EU. Communication From the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament on the Assessment of National Allocation Plans for the Allocation of Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowances in the Second Period of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (2006), European Commission, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/climat/pdf/nap2006/20061128_communication_en.pdf Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/climat/pdf/nap2006/20061128_communication_en.pdf
17. Finus M. Game Theory and International Environmental Cooperation (2001), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
18. Gilbert A., Bode J.W., and Phylipsen D. Analysis of the National Allocation Plans for the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, Ecofys Interim Report (2004). http://www.ecofys.com/com/publications/documents/Interim_Report_NAP_Evaluation_180804.pdf Ecofys, Utrecht. Available at: http://www.ecofys.com/com/publications/documents/Interim_Report_NAP_Evaluation_180804.pdf
19. IMF. International Financial Statistics (2001), International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.
20. IPCC. Climate change 2001: synthesis report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
21. Japanese Ministry of the Environment. Evaluation of the Pilot Project of Domestic Emissions Trading Scheme (2004). http://www.env.go.jp/en/earth/cc/040707.pdf Available at: http://www.env.go.jp/en/earth/cc/040707.pdf
22. Kallbekken S., Flottorp L.S., and Rive N. Why the CDM will reduce carbon leakage (2006), Paper presented at the 3rd World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists, Kyoto 3-7 July 2006
23. Klepper G., and Peterson S. Marginal abatement cost curves in general equilibrium: the influence of world energy prices. Resource and Energy Economics 28 1 (2006) 1-23
24. Klepper G., and Peterson S. Emissions trading, CDM, JI, and more: the climate strategy of the EU. Energy journal 27 2 (2006) 1-26
25. Langrock, and Sterk. The supplementarity challenge: CDM, JI & EU emissions trading. Policy Paper 1/2004 (2004), Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy
26. Michaelowa A., and Jotzo F. Transaction costs, institutional rigidities and the size of the clean development mechanism. Energy policy 33 4 (2005) 511-523
27. NSW government. Greenhouse Gas Abatement Scheme (GGAS) (2006). http://www.greenhousegas.nsw.gov.au/ Available at: http://www.greenhousegas.nsw.gov.au/
28. Peterson S. Efficient Abatement in Separated Carbon Markets: A Theoretical and Quantitative Analysis of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Kiel working paper 1271 (2006), Institute for World Economics, Kiel
29. Point Carbon. Australian States propose 20-year emissions cap and trade scheme. Carbon Market News 16 (2006) (August)
30. RGGI. The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (2006). http://www.rggi.org/ Available at: http://www.rggi.org/
31. Rehdanz K., and Tol R.S.J. Unilateral regulation of bilateral trade in greenhouse gas emission permits. Ecological Economics 54 4 (2005) 397-416
32. Springer U. The market for tradable GHG permits under the Kyoto Protocol: a survey of model studies. Energy Economics 25 (2003) 527-551
33. Sterk. Ready to link up?. The EU and the International Carbon Market. Carbon Market Europe vol. 28 (2005) (October)
34. UNFCCC. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, FCCC/CP/L.7/Add1, Kyoto (1997)
35. UNFCCC. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventh Session, Held at Marrakesh from 29 October to 10 November 2001. Part One: Proceedings (2002). http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop7/13.pdf Available at: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop7/13.pdf
36. Van Vuuren D., Lucas P., and Hilderink H. Downscaling Drivers of Global Environmental Change Scenarios: Enabling Use of the IPCC SRES Scenarios at the National and Grid Level (2006), Netherlands Environment Assessment Agency (MNP)
37. Weyant J.P., and Hill J. Introduction and overview. The Energy Journal, Special Issue on The costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, VII-XLIV (1999)
38. White House. President Announces Clear Skies & Global Climate Change Initiatives (2002), The White House, Washington DC. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/02/20020214-5.html Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/02/20020214-5.html
39. World Bank. State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2006 (2006), World Bank Report, Washington DC