Knowledge to action: Implementing a guideline for second stage labor

MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 179-186

  Sprague, Ann E ^a   Oppenheimer, Lawrence ^b   McCabe, Linda ^c   Graham, Ian D ^c   Davies, Barbara L ^b  

^a Perinatal Partnership Program of Eastern and Southeastern Ontario   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Clinical practice guideline; Knowledge transfer; Knowledge translation; Labor stage; Second

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CANADA; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DELIVERY; EDUCATION; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABOR STAGE 2; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; NURSING; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING STAFF; OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA; OBSTETRICAL NURSING; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TIME;

ANESTHESIA, EPIDURAL; ANESTHESIA, OBSTETRICAL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; LABOR STAGE, SECOND; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING AUDIT; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING RECORDS; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; OBSTETRICAL NURSING; ONTARIO; PARITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 43449110922     PISSN: 0361929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.NMC.0000318354.00859.41     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Chaillet, N., Dubé, E., Dugas, M., Audibert, F., Tourigny, C., Fraser, W., et al. (2006). Evidence-based strategies for implementing guidelines in obstetrics. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 108, 1234-1245.
2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2006). Evidence in action, acting on the evidence: A casebook of health services and policy research knowledge translation stories. Ottawa, Canada: Author.
3. Davis, D., Evans, M., Jadad, A., Perrier, L., Rath, D., Ryan, D., et al. (2003). The case for knowledge translation: Shortening the journey from evidence to effect. British Medical Journal, 327, 33-35.
4. Estabrooks, C. A. (1999). Mapping the research utilization field in nursing. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 31, 53-72.
5. Estabrooks, C. A. (2003).Translating research into practice: Implications for organizations and administrators. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 35, 53-68.
6. Estabrooks, C. A., Floyd, J., Scott-Findlay, S., O'Leary, K., & Gustha, M. (2003). Individual determinants of research utilization: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 43, 506-520.
7. Fraser, W. D., Cayer, M., Soeder, B. M., Turcot, L., Marcoux, S., & Group, P.S. (2002). Risk factors for difficult delivery in nulliparas with epidural analgesia in second stage of labor. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 99, 409-418.
8. Fraser, W. D., Marcoux, S., Krauss, I., Douglas, J., Goulet, C., Boulvain, M., et al. (2000). Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural analgesia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 182, 1165-1172.
9. Graham, I. D., Harrison, M. B., Brouwers, M., Davies, B. L., & Dunn, S. (2002). Facilitating the use of evidence in practice: Evaluating and adapting clinical practice guidelines for local use by health care organizations. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 31, 599-611.
10. Grol, R., Dalhuijsen, J., Thomas, S.V., Rutten, G., & Hokkink, H. (1998). Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: Observational study. British Medical Journal, 317, 858-861.
11. Hansen, S. L., Clark, S. L., & Foster, J. C. (2002). Active pushing versus passive fetal descent in the second stage of labor: A randomized trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 99, 29-34.
12. Kadar, N, Cruddas, M, & Campbell, S. (1986). Estimating the probability of spontaneous delivery conditional on time spent in second stage. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 93, 568-576.
13. Kitson, A., Ahmed, L. B., Harvey, G., Seers, K., & Thompson, D. (1996). From research to practice: One organizational model for promoting research-based practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23, 430-440.
14. Mackay, M. (1998). Research utilization and the CNS: Confronting the issues. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 12, 232-237.
15. Mayberry, L. J., Wood, S. H., Strange, L. B., Lee, L., Heisler, D. R., & Nielsen-Smith, K. (2000). Second stage labor management: Promotion of evidence-based practice and a collaborative approach to patient care. Washington: AWHONN.
16. Menticoglou, S. M. (1992). How long should the second stage of labour be allowed to last? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 14, 77-79.
17. Myles, T. D., & Santoloya, J. (2003). Material and neonatal outcomes in patients with prolonged second stage of labor. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 102, 52-58.
18. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2007). Intrapartum care: Care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. NICE Clinical Guideline 55. London: RCOG Press. Retrieved February 24, 2008, from www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/ IntrapartumCareSeptember2007mainguideline.pdf
19. Paterson, C. M.., Saunders, N. S., & Wadsworth, J. (1992).The characteristics of the second stage of labour in 25,069 singleton deliveries in the North WestThames Health Region. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 99, 377-380.
20. Registered Nurses Association of Ontario. (2002). Toolkit: Implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Toronto: Author. Retrieved February 24, 2008, from www.rnao.org/bestpractices/PDF/BPG_Toolkit.pdf
21. Rycroft-Malone, J., Harvey, G., Kitson, A., McCormack, B., Seers, K., & Titchen, A. (2002). Getting evidence into practice: Ingredients for change. Nursing Standard, 16(37), 38-43.
22. Rycroft-Malone, J., Harvey, G., Seers, K. K., McCormack, B., & Titchen, A. (2004). Exploration of the factors that influence the implementation of evidence into practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13, 913-924.
23. Saunders, N. S., Paterson, C. M., &Wadsworth, J. (1992). Neonatal and maternal morbidity in relation to the length of the second stage of labour. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 99, 381-385
24. Sprague, A. E., Oppenheimer, L., McCabe, L., Brownlee, J., Graham, I. D., & Davies, B. L. (2006).The Ottawa Hospital's clinical practice guideline for the second stage of labour. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Canada, 28, 769-779.
25. Zwarenstein, M., & Reeves, S. (2006). Knowledge translation and interprofessional collaboration: Where the rubber of evidence-based practice hits the road of teamwork. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26, 46-54.