The Ottawa Hospital's Clinical Practice Guidelinefor the Second Stage of Labour

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 769-779

  Sprague, Ann E ^a   Oppenheimer, Lawrence ^b   McCabe, Linda ^b   Brownlee, Janet ^b   Graham, Ian D ^c   Davies, Barbara ^c  

^a Perinatal Partnership Program of Eastern and Southeastern Ontario   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Labour stage; Obstetriclabour complications; Practice guideline; Second

Indexed keywords

OXYTOCIN; OXYTOCIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; DOCUMENTATION; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LABOR STAGE 2; MIDWIFE; MULTIPARA; NULLIPARA; NURSE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT POSITIONING; PATIENT SAFETY; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; FETUS MONITORING; MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; TIME;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; FETAL MONITORING; HUMANS; LABOR STAGE, SECOND; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; OXYTOCICS; PREGNANCY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 39049190456     PISSN: 17012163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32257-5     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Menticoglou S.M. How long should the second stage of labour be allowed to last?. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Can 1992, 14(7):77-79.
2. Piquard F., Schaefer A., Hsiung R., Dellenbach P., Haberey P. Are there two biological parts in the second stage of labor?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1989, 68:713-718.
3. Cheng Y., Hopkins L.M., Caughey A.B. How long is too long: does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004, 191:933-938.
4. Kadar N., Cruddas M., Campbell S. Estimating the probability of spontaneous delivery conditional on time spent in second stage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986, 93:568-576.
5. Hansen S.L., Clark S.L., Foster J.C. Active pushing versus passive fetal descent in the second stage of labor: A randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2002, 99(2):29-34.
6. Plunkett B.A., Lin A., Wong C.A., Grobman W.A., Peaceman A.M. Management of the second stage of labor in nulliparas with continuous epidural analgesia. Obstet Gynecol 2003, 102(1):109-114.
7. Family-centred maternity and newborn care: National guidelines. Health Canada 2000, Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Ottawa.
8. Graham I., Harrison M., Brouwers M. Evaluating and adapting practice guidelines for local use: a conceptual framework. Clinical governance and best value. Meeting the modernisation agenda 2003, 213-229. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh. S. Pickering, J. Thompson (Eds.).
9. Mayberry L.J., Wood S., Strange L., Lee L., Heisler D., Neilsen-Smith K. Second stage of labor management: promotion of evidence-based practice and a collaborative approach to patient care 2000, 1-30. AWHONN, Washington.
10. World Health Organization. Care in normal birth: a practical guide 1999, 1-57. World Health Organization Department of Reproductive Health and Research, Geneva.
11. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Second stage of labour. Healthy beginnings: Guidelines for care during pregnancy and childbirth. SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Can 1998, 20:52-58.
12. Cluzeau F., Littlejohns P., Grimshaw J.M., Feder G., Moran S. Development and application of a generic methodology to assess the quality of clinical guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care 1999, 11(1):21-28.
13. Fraser W.D., Marcoux S., Krauss I., Douglas J., Goulet C., Boulvain M., et al. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage oflabour with continuous epidural analgesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000, 182(5):1165-1172.
14. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. New grades for recommendations from the Canadian task force on preventive health care. CMAJ 2003, 169-207.
15. Woolf S.H., Battista R.N., G.M.A., Logan A.G., Wang E. Assessing the clinical effectiveness of preventive maneuvers: analytic principles and systematic methods in reviewing evidence and developing clinical practice recommendations. A report by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. J Clin Epidemiol 1990, 43:891-905.
16. Buxton E.J., Redman C.W., Obhrai M. Delayed pushing with lumbar epidural in labour - does it increase the incidence of spontaneous delivery?. J Obstet Gynaecol 1988, 8:258-261.
17. Roberts J. A new understanding of the second stage of labor: implications for nursing care. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2003, 32(6):794-801.
18. Simpson K.R., James D.C. Effects of immediate versus delayed pushing during second-stage labor on fetal well being. Nurs Res 2005, 54(3):149-157.
19. Saunders N.S., Paterson C.M., Wadsworth J. Neonatal and maternal morbidity in relation to the length of the second stage of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992, 99:381-385.
20. Menticoglou S.M., Manning F., Harman C., Morrison I. Perinatal outcome in relation to the second-stage duration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995, 173(3):906-912. Part1.
21. Myles T.D., Santolaya J. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with a prolonged second stage. Obstet Gynecol 2003, 102(1):52-58.
22. Paterson C.M., Saunders N.S., Wadsworth J. The characteristics of the second stage of labour in 25,069 singleton deliveries in the North West Thames Health Region. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992, 99:377-380.
23. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Dystocia and augmentation of labor. ACOG Practice Bulletin 2003, 49:1-9.
24. Fraser W.D., Cayer M., Soeder B.M., Turcot L., Marcoux S., Group P.S. Risk factors for difficult delivery in nulliparas with epidural analgesia in second stage oflabor. Obstet Gynecol 2002, 99(3):409-418.
25. De Jonge A., Teunissen T., Lagro-Janssen A.L. Supine position compared to other positions during the second stage of labor: a meta-analytic review. J Psychom Obstet Gynaecol 2004, 25(1):35-45.
26. Simkin P., Ancheta R. Labor progress handbook: early interventions to prevent and treat dystocia 2000, Blackwell Science, Oxford.
27. Shermer R.H., Raines D.A. Positioning during the second stage of labor: moving back to basics. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1997, 26(6):727-734.
28. Petersen L. Pushing techniques during labor: issues and controversies. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1997, 26(6):719-726.
29. Bloom S.L., Casey B.M., Schaffer J.I., McIntire D.D., Leveno K.J. A randomized trial of coached versus uncoached maternal pushing during the second stage oflabor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006, 194:10-13.
30. Sampselle C.M., Miller J.M., Luecha Y., Fischer K., Rosten L. Provider support of spontaneous pushing during the second stage of labor. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2004, 34(6):695-702.
31. Fitzpatrick M., Harkin R., McQuillan K., O'Brien C., O'Connell P.R., O'Herlihy C.O. Arandomised clinical trial comparing the effects of delayed versus immediate pushing with epidural analgesia on mode of delivery and faecal continence. BJOG 2002, 109:1359-1365.
32. Bahl R., Strachan B., Murphy D.J. Pelvic floor morbidity at 3 years after instrumental delivery and cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor and the impact of subsequent delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005, 192:789-794.
33. Liebling R.E., Swingler R., Patel R.R., Verity L., Soothill P.W., Murphy D.J. Pelvic floor morbidity up to one year after difficult instrumental delivery and cesarean section in the second stage of labor: a cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004, 191:4-10.
34. MacLellan A.H., Taylor A.W., Wilson D.H., Wilson D. The prevalence ofpelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. BJOG 2000, 107:1460-1470.
35. Press J., Klein M.C., von Dadelszen P. A systematic review of the literature on urinary and fecal incontinence and sexual dysfunction by mode of delivery. Medscape Clinical Update 2006.
36. Burgers J.S., Grol R., Klazinga N.S., Makela M., Zaat J. Towards evidence-based clinical practice: an international survey of 18 clinical guideline programs. Int J Qual Health Care 2003, 15(1):31-45.
37. Davis D., Palda V., Drazin Y., Rogers J. Assessing and scaling the knowledge pyramid: the good-guideline guide. CMAJ 2006, 174:337-338.
38. Graham I.D., Harrison M.B., Brouwers M., Davies B.L., Dunn S. Facilitating the use of evidence in practice: evaluating and adapting clinical practice guidelines for local use by health care organizations. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2002, 31(5):599-611.
39. Graham I.D., Harrison M.B., Lorimer K., Pierscianowski T., Friedberg E., Buchanan M. Adapting national and international leg ulcer practice guidelines for local use: The Ontario Leg Ulcer Community Care Protocol. Adv Skin Wound Care 2005, 18:307-318.
40. Woolf S.H., Battista R.N., Angerson G.M., Logan A.G., Eel W. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Exam 1994, xxxvii. Canada Communication Group, Ottawa.