Control of gastrula cell motility by the Goosecoid/Mix.1/ Siamois network: Basic patterns and paradoxical effects

Developmental Dynamics

Volumn 237, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1307-1320

  Luu, Olivia ^a   Nagel, Martina ^a   Wacker, Stephan ^b   Lemaire, Patrick ^c   Winklbauer, Rudolf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^c AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Cell migration; Cell motility; Cell polarity; Gastrulation; Goosecoid; Mix.1; RhoA; Siamois; Xenopus

Indexed keywords

GOOSECOID PROTEIN; MIX 1 PROTEIN; PROTEIN; SIA PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EMBRYO; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL FATE; CELL MIGRATION; CELL MOTILITY; CELL POLARITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECTODERM; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; GASTRULA; MESODERM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; REGULATORY MECHANISM; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

ANIMALS; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL POLARITY; FIBRONECTINS; GASTRULA; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GOOSECOID PROTEIN; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; RHOA GTP-BINDING PROTEIN; XENOPUS LAEVIS; XENOPUS PROTEINS;

SIA;

EID: 43449105885     PISSN: 10588388     EISSN: 10970177     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.21522     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Alahari SK, Reddig PJ, Juliano RL. 2004. The integrin-binding protein Nischarin regulates cell migration by inhibiting PAK. EMBO J 23:2777-2788.
2. Artinger M, Blitz I, Inoue K, Tran U, Cho KWY. 1997. Interaction of goosecoid and brachyury in Xenopus mesoderm patterning. Mech Dev 65:187-196.
3. Blumberg B, Wright CVE, De Robertis EM, Cho KWY. 1991. Organizer-specific homeobox genes in Xenopus laevis embryos. Science 253:194-196.
4. Carnac G, Kodjabachian L, Gurdon JB, Lemaire P. 1996. The homeobox gene Siamois is a target of the Wnt dorsalization pathway and triggers organizer activity in the absence of mesoderm. Development 122:3055-3065.
5. Cho KWY, Blumberg B, Steinbeisser H, De Robertis EM. 1991. Molecular nature of Spemann's organizer: the role of the Xenopus homeobox gene goosecoid. Cell 67:1111-1120.
6. Danen EHJ, van Rheenen J, Franken W, Huveneers S, Sonneveld P, Jalink K, Sonnenberg A. 2005. Integrins control motile strategy through a Rho-cofilin pathway. J Cell Biol 169:515-526.
7. Darras S, Marikawa Y, Elinson RP, Lemaire P. 1997. Animal and vegetal pole cells of early Xenopus embryos respond differently to maternal dorsal determinants: implications for the patterning of the organizer. Development 124:4275-4286.
8. Ecochard V, Cayrol C, Rey S, Cailloi D, Lemaire P, Duprat AM. 1998. A novel Xenopus Mix-like gene milk involved in the control of the endomesodermal fates. Development 125:2577-2585.
9. Fan MJ, Sokol SY. 1997. A role for Siamois in Spemann organizer formation. Development 124:2581-2589.
10. Ferreiro B, Artinger M, Cho KWY, Niehrs C. 1998. Antimorphic gooosecoids. Development 125:1347-1359.
11. Hartwell KA, Muir B, Reinhardt F, Carpenter AE, Sgroi DC, Weinberg RA. 2006. The Spemann organizer gene, Goosecoid, promotes tumor metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:18969-18974.
12. Henry GL, Melton DA. 1998. Mixer, a homeobox gene required for endoderm development. Science 281:91-95.
13. Ibrahim H, Winklbauer R. 2001. Mechanisms of mesendoderm internalization in the Xenopus gastrula: lessons from the ventral side. Dev Biol 240:108-122.
14. Izzi L, Silvestri C, von Both I, Labbe E, Zakin L, Wrana JL, Attisano L. 2007. Foxh1 recruits Gsc to negatively regulate Mixl1 expression during early mouse development. EMBO J 26:3132-3143.
15. Jaganathan BG, Ruester B, Dressel L, Stein S, Grez M, Seifried E, Henschler R. 2007. Rho inhibition induces migration of mesenchymal stroma cells. Stem Cells 25:1966-1974.
16. Keller RE. 1981. An experimental analysis of the role of bottle cells and the deep marginal zone in gastrulation of Xenopus laevis. J Exp Zool 216:81-101.
17. Keller R, Winklbauer R. 1992. The cellular basis of amphibian gastrulation. Curr Top Dev Biol 27:39-89.
18. Keller R, Davidson LA, Shook DR. 2003. How we are shaped: the biomechanics of gastrulation. Differentiation 71:171-205.
19. Kessler DS. 1997. Siamois is required for formation of Spemann's organizer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:13017-13022.
20. Kiosses WB, Daniels RH, Otey C, Bokoch GM, Schwartz MA. 1999. A role for p21-activated kinase in endothelial cell migration. J Cell Biol 147:831-843.
21. Kreyszig E. 1973. Statistische Methoden und ihre Anwendungen. [Statistical methods and their application.] Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
22. Kwan KM, Kirschner MW. 2003. Xbra functions as a switch between cell migration and convergent extension in the Xenopus gastrula. Development 130:1961-1972.
23. Latinkic BV, Smith JC. 1999. Goosecoid and mix.1 represses Brachyury expression and are required for head formation in Xenopus. Development 125:1769-1779.
24. Laurent MN, Blitz IL, Hashimoto C, Rothbacher U, Cho KW-Y. 1997. The Xenopus homeobox gene Twin mediates Wnt induction of goosecoid in establishment of Spemann's organizer. Development 124:4905-4916.
25. Leisner TM, Liu M, Jaffer ZM, Chernoff J, Parise LV. 2005. Essential role of CIB1 in regulating PAK1 activation and cell migration. J Cell Biol 170:465-476.
26. Lemaire P, Garrett N, Gurdon JB. 1995. Expression cloning of Siamois, a Xenopus homoeobox gene expressed in dorsal-vegetal cells of blastulae and able to induce a complete secondary axis. Cell 81:85-94.
27. Lemaire P, Darras S, Caillol D, Kodjabachian L. 1998. A role for the vegetally expressed Xenopus gene Mix.1 in endoderm formation and in the restriction of mesoderm to the marginal zone. Development 125:2371-2380.
28. Mailhos C, Andre S, Mollereau B, Goriely A, Hemmati-Brivanlou A, Desplan C. 1998. Drosophila Goosecoid requires a conserved heptapeptide for repression of Paired-class homeoprotein activators. Development 125:937-947.
29. Mead PE, Brivanlou IH, Kelley CM, Zon LI. 1996. BMP-4-responsive regulation of dorsal-ventral patterning by the homeobox protein Mix.1. Nature 382:357-360.
30. Mead PE, Zhou Y, Lustig KD, Huber TL, Kirschner MW, Zon LI. 1998. Cloning of Mix-related homeodomain proteins using fast retrieval of gel shift activities, (FROGS), a technique for the isolation of DNA-binding proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:11251-11256.
31. Nakayama M, Amano M, Katsumi A, Kaneko T, Kawabata S, Takefuji M, Kaibuchi K. 2005. Rho-kinase and myosin II activities are required for cell type and environment specific migration. Genes Cells 10:107-117.
32. Niehrs C, Keller R, Cho KWY, De Robertis EM. 1993. The homeobox gene goosecoid controls cell migration in the Xenopus embryo. Cell 72:491-503.
33. Nieuwkoop PD, Faber J. 1967. Normal table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
34. Niggli V, Schmid M, Nievergelt A. 2006. Differential roles of Rho-kinase and myosin light chain kinase in regulating shape, adhesion, and migration of HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 343:602-608.
35. Pankov R, Endo Y, Even-Ram S, Araki M, Clark K, Cukierman E, Matsumoto K, Yamada KM. 2005. A rac switch regulates random versus directionally persistent migration. J Cell Biol 170:793-802.
36. Ramos J.W, DeSimone DW. 1996. Xenopus embryonic cell adhesion to fibronectin: position-specific activation of RGD/synergy site-dependent migratory behavior at gastrulation. J Cell Biol 134:227-240.
37. Reintsch WE, Hausen P. 2001. Dorsoventral differences in cell-cell interactions modulate the motile behavior of cells from the Xenopus gastrula. Dev Biol 240:387-403.
38. Ren R, Nagel M, Tahinci E, Winklbauer R, Symes K. 2006. Migrating anterior mesoderm cells and intercalating trunk mesoderm cells have distinct responses to Rho and Rac during Xenopus gastrulation. Dev Dyn 235:1090-1099.
39. Rosa FM. 1989. Mix.1, a homeobox mRNA inducible by mesoderm inducers, is expressed mostly in the presumptive endoderm cells of Xenopus embryos. Cell 57:965-974.
40. Saka Y, Tada M, Smith JC. 2000. A screen for targets of the Xenopus T-box gene Xbra. Mech Dev 93:27-39.
41. Sander EE, van Delft S, ten Klooster JP, Reid T, van der Kammen RA, Michiels F, Collard JG. 1998. Matrix-dependent Tiam1/Rac signaling in epithelial cells promotes either cell-cell adhesion or cell migration and is regulated by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. J Cell Biol 143:1385-1398.
42. Sander V, Reversade B, De Robertis EM. 2007. The opposing homeobox genes Goosecoid and Vent1/2 self-regulate Xenopus patterning. EMBO J 26:2955-2965.
43. Smith ST, Jaynes JB. 1996. A conserved region of engrailed, shared among all en-, gsc-, Nk1-, Nk2- and msh-class homeoproteins, mediates active transcriptional repression in vivo. Development 122:3141-3150.
44. Tada M, Casey ES, Fairclough L, Smith JC. 1998. Bix.1, a direct target of Xenopus T-box genes, causes formation of ventral mesoderm and endoderm. Development 125:3997-4006.
45. Tahinci E, Symes K. 2003. Distinct functions of Rho and Rac are required for convergent extension during Xenopus gastrulation. Dev Biol 259:318-335.
46. Vize PD. 1996. DNA sequences mediating the transcriptional response of the Mix.2 homeobox gene to mesoderm induction. Dev Biol 177:226-231.
47. Wacker S, Brodbeck A, Lemaire P, Niehrs C, Winklbauer R. 1998. Patterns and control of cell motility in the Xenopus gastrula. Development 125:1931-1942.
48. Wacker S, Grimm K, Joos T, Winklbauer R. 2000. Development and control of tissue separation at gastrulation in Xenopus. Dev Biol 224:428-439.
49. Wardle FC, Smith JC. 2006. Transcriptional regulation of mesendoderm formation in Xenopus. Semin Cell Dev Biol 17:99-109.
50. Wheeler AP, Wells CM, Smith SD, Vega FM, Henderson RB, Tybulewicz VL, Ridley AJ. 2006. Rac1 and Rac2 regulate macrophage morphology but are not essential for migration. J Cell Sci 119:2749-2757.
51. Wilson D, Sheng G, Lecuit T, Dostatni N, Desplan C. 1993. Cooperative dimerization of paired class homeo domains on DNA. Genes Dev 7:2120-2134.
52. Winklbauer R. 1990. Mesodermal cell migration during Xenopus gastrulation. Dev Biol 142:155-168.
53. Winklbauer R, Keller R. 1996. Fibronectin, mesoderm migration, and gastrulation in Xenopus. Dev Biol 177:413-426.
54. Winklbauer R, Nagel M. 1991. Directional mesodermal cell migration in the Xenopus gastrula. Dev Biol 148:573-589.
55. Winklbauer R, Selchow A. 1992. Motile behavior and protrusive activity of migratory mesoderm cells from the Xenopus gastrula. Dev Biol 150:335-351.
56. Winklbauer R, Schurfeld M. 1999. Vegetal rotation, a new gastrulation movement involved in the internalization of the mesoderm and endoderm in Xenopus. Development 126:3703-3713.
57. Worthylake R, Burridge K. 2003. RhoA and ROCK promote migration by limiting membrane protrusions. J Biol Chem 278:13578-13583.
58. Xu J, Wang F, van Keymeulen A, Herzmark P, Straight A, Kelly K, Takuwa Y, Sugimoto N, Mitchison T, Bourne H.R. 2003. Divergent signals and cytoskeletal assemblies regulate self-organizing polarity in neutrophils. Cell 114:201-214.
59. Yamamoto S, Hikasa H, Ono H, Taira M. 2003. Molecular link in the sequential induction of the Spemann organizer: direct activation of the cerberus gene by Xlim-1, Otx2, Mix.1, and Siamois, immediately downstream from Nodal and Wnt signaling. Dev Biol 257:190-204.
60. Zuo Y, Shields S-K, Chakraborty C. 2006. Enhanced intrinsic migration of aggressive breast cancer cells by inhibition of Rac1 GTPase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 351:361-367.