Inverse formulation for geometrically exact stress resultant shells

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 74, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1278-1302

  Zhou, Xianlian ^a   Lu, Jia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Geometrically exact stress resultant shell; Inverse elastostatics; Inverse shell element

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DEFORMATION; ELASTICITY; GEOMETRY; STRESS ANALYSIS; THIN WALLED STRUCTURES;

GEOMETRICALLY EXACT STRESS RESULTANT SHELL; INVERSE ELASTOSTATIC METHOD; INVERSE SHELL ELEMENT;

SHELLS (STRUCTURES);

ANISOTROPY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DEFORMATION; ELASTICITY; GEOMETRY; SHELLS (STRUCTURES); STRESS ANALYSIS; THIN WALLED STRUCTURES;

EID: 43449100929     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.2215     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Govindjee S, Mihalic PA. Computational methods for inverse finite elastostatics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1996; 136:47-57.
2. Yamada T. Finite element procedure of initial shape determination for hyperelasticity. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 1998; 6(2):173-183.
3. Lu J, Zhou X, Raghavan ML. Inverse elastostatic stress analysis in pre-deformed biological structures: demonstration using abdominal aortic aneurysm. Journal of Biomechanies 2007; 40:693-696.
4. Govindjee S, Mihalic PA. Computational methods for inverse deformations in quasi-incompressible finite elasticity. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1998; 43:821-838.
5. Koishi M, Govindjee S. Inverse design methodology of a tire. Tire Science and Technology 2001; 29:155-170.
6. Lu J, Zhou X, Raghavan ML. Computational method of inverse elastostatics for anisotropic hyperelastic solids. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2007; 69:1239-1261.
7. Bischoff M, Wall WA, Bletzinger KU, Ramm E. Models finite elements for thin-walled structures. In Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics, Volume 2: Solids and Structures, Chapter 3, Stein E, de Borst R, Hughes TJR (eds). Wiley: New York, 2004; 59-138.
8. Yang HTY, Saigal S, Masud A, Kapania RK. A survey of recent shell finite elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2000; 47:101-127.
9. Batoz J, Guo YQ, Mercier F. The inverse approach with simple triangular shell elements for large strain predictions of sheet metal forming parts. Engineering Computations 1998; 15:864-892.
10. Lee C, Cao J. Shell element formulation of multi-step inverse analysis for axisymmetric deep drawing process. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2001; 50:681-706.
11. Simo JC, Fox DD. On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part I: Formulation and optimal parametrization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1989; 72(3):267-304.
12. Simo JC, Fox DD. On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part II: The linear theory; computational aspects. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1989; 73:53-92.
13. Simo JC, Fox DD, Rifai MS. On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part III: Computational aspects of the nonlinear-theory. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1990; 79:21-70.
14. Simo JC, Rifai MS, Fox DD. On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part IV: Variable thickness shells with through-the-thickness stretching. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1990; 81: 91-126.
15. Simo JC, Kennedy JG. On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part V: Nonlinear plasticity-formulation and integration algorithms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1992; 96: 133-171.
16. Simo JC, Rifai MS, Fox DD. On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part VI: Conserving algorithms for nonlinear dynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1992; 34:117-164.
17. Simo JC. On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part VII: Shell intersections with 5/6-dof finite element formulations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1993; 108:319-339.
18. Ibrahimbegovič A. Stress resultant geometrically exact shell theory for finite rotations and its finite element implementation. Applied Mechanics Review 1997; 50:199-226.
19. Ericksen JL, Truesdell C. Exact theory of stress and strain in rods and shells. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 1958; 1:295-323.
20. Naghdi PM. The theory of plates and shells. In Handbuch der Physik, vol. Vla/2, Truesdell C (ed.). Springer: Berlin, New York, 1972; 425-640.
21. Vu-Quoc L, Ebcioǧlu IK, Deng H. Dynamic formulation for geometrically-exact sandwich shells. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1997; 34:2517-2548.
22. Vu-Quoc L, Ebcioǧlu IK. Multilayer shells: geometrically-exact formulation of equations of motion. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2000; 37:6705-6737.
23. Vu-Quoc K, Deng H, Tan XG. Geometrically-exact sandwich shells: the static case. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2000; 189:167-203.
24. Vu-Quoc L, Deng H, Tan XG. Geometrically-exact sandwich shells: the dynamic case. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2001; 190:2825-2873.
25. Vu-Quoc L, Ebcioǧlu IK. On the physical meaning of the dynamical equations governing geometrically-exact multilayer shells. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2005; 194:2363-2384.
26. Fillinger MF, Raghavan ML, Marra SP, Cronenwett JL, Kennedy FE. In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rapture risk. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2002; 36:589-597.
27. Fillinger MF, Marra SP, Raghavan ML, Kennedy FE. Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2003; 37:724-732.
28. Ma B, Lu J, Harbaugh RE, Raghavan ML. Nonlinear anisotropic stress analysis of anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysms. Journal of Biomedical Engineering (ASME) 2007; 129:88-99.
29. Taylor RL. FEAP user manual: v7.5. Technical Report, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 2003.
30. Humphrey JD, Strumpf RK, Yin FCP. Determination of a constitutive relation for passive myocardium. I. A new functional form. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering (ASME) 1990; 112(3):333-339.
31. Kyriacou SK, Schwab C, Humphrey JD. Finite element analysis of nonlinear orthotropic hyperelastic membrane. Computational Mechanics 1996; 18:269-278-1022.
32. Humphrey JD, Strumpf RK, Yin FCP. Determination of a constitutive relation for passive myocardium. II. Parameter-estimation. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering (ASME) 1990; 112(3):340-346.
33. Sacks MS. Biaxial mechanical evaluation of planar biological materials. Journal of Elasticity 2000; 61:199-246.
34. Mimajafi A, Raymer J, Scott MJ, Sacks MS. The effects of collagen fiber orientation on the flexural properties of pericardial heterograft biometerials. Biometerials 2005; 26:795-804.
35. Kim H, Chandran KB, Sacks MS, Lu J. An experimentally derived stress resultant shell model for heart valve dynamic simulations. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2007; 35(1):30-44.
36. Simmonds JG. The strain energy density of rubber-like shells. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1985; 21:67-77.
37. Schieck B, Pietraszkiewicz W, Stumpf H. Theory and numerical analysis of shells undergoing large elastic strains. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1992; 29:689-709.
38. Elger DF, Blackketter DM, Budwig RS, Johansen KH. The influence of shape on the stresses in model abdominal aortic aneurysms. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering - Transactions of the ASME 1996; 118:326-332.
39. Raghavan ML, Vorp DA, Federle MP, Makaroun MS, Webster MW. Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2000; 31:760-769.
40. Raghavan ML, Vorp DA. Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. Journal of Biomechanics 2000; 33:475-482.