Review of technology: Planning for the development of telesonography

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 18-27

  Bassignani, Matthew J ^a   Dwyer III, Samuel J ^a   Ciambotti, Jonathan M ^a   Olazagasti, Juan M ^a   Moran, Ruth ^a   Moynihan, Sean ^a   Weaver, Alfred C ^a   Snyder, Andrew M ^a  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; IMAGE COMPRESSION; IMAGE QUALITY; MEDICAL IMAGING; MOTION PICTURES; RADIOLOGY; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; ULTRASONIC IMAGING;

ENCODERS; MPEG-4; TELERADIOGRAPHY; TELESONOGRAPHY;

TELEMEDICINE;

AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERNET; MOTION; MULTIMEDIA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PLANNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REVIEW; TELECOMMUNICATION; X RAY; ECONOMICS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; TELECONSULTATION; TELERADIOLOGY;

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; DATA COMPRESSION; INTERNET; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; REMOTE CONSULTATION; TELERADIOLOGY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 4344706269     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-003-1721-4     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Landwehr, JB Jr, Zador, IE, Wolfe, HM, et al: Telemedicine and fetal ultrasonography: assessment of technical performance and clinical feasibility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:846-848, 1997
2. Macedonia, CR: Three-dimensional ultrasonographic telepresence. J Telemed Telecare 4:224-230, 1998
3. Ratib, O, Ligier, Y, Brandon, D, et al: Update on digital image management and PACS. Abdom Imaging 25:333-340, 2000
4. Hwang, SC, Lee, MH: A WEB-based telePACS using an asymmetric satellite system. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 4:212-215, 2000
5. Mathiesen, FK: WEB technology - the future of teleradiology? Comput Meth Programs Biomed 66:87-90, 2001
6. http://www.algotec.com/products/medisurf.htm
7. Kinosada, Y, Takada, A, Hosoba, M: Real-time radiology - new concepts for teleradiology. Comput Meth Programs Biomed 66:47-54, 2001
8. American College of Radiology ACR Appropriateness Criteria 2000. Radiology 215 (Suppl): 1-1511, 2000
9. Shea, JA, Berlin, JA, Escarce, JJ, et al: Revised estimates of diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity in suspected biliary tract disease. Arch Intern Med 154:2573-2581, 1994
10. O'Neill, WC: Sonographic evaluation of renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis 35:1021-1038, 2000
11. Laing, FC, Brown, DL, DiSalvo, DN: Gynecologic ultrasound. Radiol Clin North Am 39:523-540, 2001
12. Chan, V, Hanbidge, A, Wilson, S, et al: Case for active physician involvement in US practice. Radiology 199:555-560, 1996
13. Beard, DV, Hemminger, BM, Keefe, B, et al: Real-time radiologist review of remote ultrasound using low-cost video and voice. Invest Radiol 28:732-734, 1993
14. Falconer, J, Giles, W, Villanueva, H: Realtime ultrasound diagnosis over a wide-area network (WAN) using off-the-shelf components. J Telemed Telecare 3(Suppl 1): 28-30, 1997
15. Duerinckx, AJ, Hayrapetian, A, Melany, M, et al: Real-time sonographic video transfer using asynchronous transfer mode technology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:1353-1355, 1997
16. Tanenbaum, AS: Computer Networks. 3 Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1996, pp 67-72
17. Fritz, SL: DICOM standardization. In: Siegel, EL, Kolodner, RM (eds) Filmless Radiology. Springer, New York, 1999, pp 311-321
18. Oosterwijk, H: DICOM Basics. Crossroads, TX: O'Tech Inc., 2000
19. Chanbari, M: Video coding. Exeter: Short Run Press Ltd, 2000
20. Wallace, GK: The JPEG still picture compression standard. Commun ACM 34:30-44, 1991
21. MPEG-1 (Coding of moving pictures and associated audio for digital storage media at up to 1.5 Mbit/s) ISO/IEC 1117-1122, video, November 1991
22. Haskel, BG, Puri, A, Netravali, AN: Digital video: an introduction to MPEG-2 New York: Chapman and Hall, 1997
23. Koener, R, Perera, F, Chiariglione, L: MPEG-4: context and objectives. Image Commun J 9:4, 1997
24. Pennebaker, WH, Mitchell, JL: JPEG: still image compression standard. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1993
25. Inside Windows Media. Que, Microsoft Corporation, 1999, www.quecorp.com
26. DeAngelis, GA, Dempsey, BJ, Berr, S, et al: Diagnostic efficacy of compressed digitized real-time sonography of uterine fibroids. Acad Radiol 4:83-89, 1997
27. DeAngelis, GA, Dempsey, BJ, Berr, S, et al: Digitized real-time ultrasound: signal compression experiment. Radiology 197:336, 1995
28. Sublett, JW, Dempsey, BJ, Weaver, AC: Design and implementation of a digital teleultrasound system for real-time remote diagnosis, computer-based medical systems. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1995, pp 292-228
29. Sublett J: Design of a Teleultrasound System, Master's thesis, University of Virginia, May 1996
30. Bubash-Faust LB, Bassignani MJ: A Comparison between Diagnostic Quality Digitizer and Flat Bed Scanner with Transparency Adapter for the Creation of Digital Teaching Files. Society for Health Services Research in Radiology Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, October 18-20, 2001
31. Weaver AC, Viswanathan A, Gay S, et al: Teleultasound. RSNA, December 1996
32. Weaver AC, Dwyer SJ, Rheuban K: An exploration of streaming multimedia for pediatric cardiology. Fund for Exploration of Science and Technology, University of Virginia, March 2001
33. Swets, JA, Pickett, RM: Evaluation of diagnostic systems, methods from signal detection theory. New York: Academic Press, 1982, pp 80-93
34. Hanley, JA, McNeil, BJ: The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29-36, 1982
35. Hanley, JA, McNeil, BJ: A method of comparing the areas under receiving operating characteristic curves from the same cases. Radiology 148:839-843, 1983
36. Barnett, SB, Rott, HD, ter Haar, GR, et al: The sensitivity of biological tissue to ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 23:805-812, 1997
37. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Bioeffects CommitteeBioeffects considerations for the safety of diagnostic ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 7(9 Suppl):S1-38, 1988