Update on digital image management and PACS

Abdominal Imaging

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 333-340

  Ratib, O ^a   Ligier, Y ^b   Bandon, D ^b   Valentino, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Digital imaging; Electronic image management; PACS

Indexed keywords

IMAGING; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERNET; MANAGED CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TELECOMMUNICATION;

COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATICS APPLICATIONS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TELERADIOLOGY;

EID: 0033945023     PISSN: 09428925     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002610000011     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Bowers G, Steiner E, Kalman M. Implementing teleradiology in a private radiology practice: lessons learned. J Digit Imaging 11(suppl 1998;1):96-98
2. Brink J, Neklesa V, Mutalik P, et al. PACS Innovations leading to improved patient care. Appl Radiol 1998;8:29-30
3. Dreyer K, Mehta A, Sack D, et al. Filmless medical imaging: experiences of the Massachusetts General Hospital. J Digit Imaging 1998;1 (suppl 2):8-11
4. Roberson G, Shieh Y. Radiology information systems, picture archiving and communication systems, teleradiology - overview and design criteria. J Digit Imaging 1998;11(suppl 2):2-7
5. Siegel E, Reiner B. The costs and benefits of pacs in the VA: past experience, present reality, and future potential. Appl Radiol 1998; 8:15-18
6. Chaney DM, Cotter NK. Comprehensive business planning for PACS. Appl Radiol 1998;8:35-38
7. Ratib O, Ligier Y, Scherrer JR. Digital image management and communication in medicine. Comp Med Imaging Graphics 1994; 18:73-85
8. Williamson EE, Byrn Williamson J. Radiologist-patient interactions: implications for picture archiving and communications systems and teleradiology. J Digit Imaging 1999; 12(suppl 1): 137-138
9. Scott WJ, Bluemke D, Mysko W, et al. Interpretation of emergency department radiographs by radiologists and emergency medicine physicians: teleradiology workstations versus radiograph readings. Radiol Soc North Am 1995; 195:223-229
10. Siegel E, Groleau G, Reiner B, et al. Computerized follow-up of discrepancies in image interpretarion between emergency and radiology departments. J Digit Imaging 1998;11(suppl 1):18-20
11. Rosen M, Levine D, Carpenter J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy with US: remote radiologists' versus on-site radiologists' interpretations. Radiol Soc North Am 1999;210:733-736
12. DiSantis D, Scatarige J, Cramer M, et al. Feasibility of digital teleradiology for imaging evaluation of patients with acute right upper quadrant abdominal pain. Radiol Soc North Am 1990;177: 707-708
13. Levine C, Laufer I, Gingold E, et al. Gastrointestinal imaging: a systems analysis comparing digital and conventional techniques. AJR 1999;172:1279-1284
14. Boudier T, Shotton D. Video on the internet: an introduction to the digital encoding, compression, and transmission of moving image data. J Struct Biol 1999;125:133-155
15. Smalberg I. Issues in establishing 24 hour radiology faculty coverage in an academic hospital setting. Presented at the annual of the American Roentgenology Society, New Orleans, 1999
16. Lemke HU. Economic impact of modern telematic technologies. 1998;S436-S440
17. Brink J. PACS: the proof is in the pudding. Appl Radiol 1998;8: 9-13
18. Dwyer S. Network wise. Appl Radiol 1998;12:13-15
19. Frey G, Spicer K. Teleradiology: technology and practice. J Digit Imaging; 1999;12(suppl 1):226-227
20. Rosslyn V. National Electrical Manufacturers' Association. Digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM). NEMA publication 1996;3.1-3.13
21. Ratib O, Ligier Y, Welz R, et al. Digital interchange standard for cardiology (DISC). A new standard for off-line communication of cardiovascular images on recordable CD. Thorac Imaging 1997;4: 135-139
22. Ratib O, Mascarini C, Ligier Y, et al. The World Wide Web (WWW) for intra- and extra-hospital communicaton of images and patient information. Int J Cardiac Imaging 1997;13:65-76
23. Department of Health and Human Services. Security and electronic signature standards: proposed rule. Fed Reg 1998;63:155