Policy implementation and the environmental protection agency: What factors influence remediation at superfund sites?

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 375-392

  Daley, Dorothy M ^a,b   Layton, David F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HAZARDOUS WASTE; REMEDIATION; SUPERFUND; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 4344704122     PISSN: 0190292X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2004.00071.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Barnett, H. C. (1994). Toxic debts and the Superfund dilemma. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
2. Bowman, A. O. M. (1988). Five years and how many cleanups? In C. E. Davis & J. P. Lester (Eds.), Dimensions of hazardous waste politics and policy, (pp. 129-144). New York: Greenwood Press.
3. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., & Jones, B. S. (1997). Time is of the essence: Event history models in political science. American Journal of Political Science, 41(4), 1414-1461.
4. Brehm, J., & Gates, S. (1997). Working, shirking, and sabotage: Bureaucratic response to a democratic public, Michigan Studies in political analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
5. Church, T. W., & Nakamura, R. T. (1993). Cleaning up the mess: Implementation strategies in Superfund. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
6. Cleves, M. A., Gould, W. W., & Gutierrez, R. G. (2004). An introduction to survival analysis using stata. (Rev. ed.) College Station, TX: Stata Press.
7. Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187-220.
8. Davis, C. E., & Lester, J. P. (1988). Hazardous waste politics and the policy process. In C. E. Davis & J. P. Lester (Eds.), Dimensions of hazardous waste politics and policy (pp. xvii, 256). New York: Greenwood Press.
9. Davis, C., & Davis, S. K. (1999). State enforcement of the federal hazardous waste program. Polity, 31(3), 451-468.
10. Davis, C., & Feiock, R. (1992). Testing theories of state hazardous waste regulation-A reassessment of the Williams and Matheny Study. American Politics Quarterly, 20(4), 501-511.
11. Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
12. Feiock, R. C., & West, J. P. (1993). Testing competing explanations for policy adoption-Municipal solid waste recycling programs. Political Research Quarterly 46(2), 399-419.
13. Fiorino, D. J. (1995). Making environmental policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14. Hall, H. I., Price-Green, P. A., Ramana Dhara, V., & Kaye, W. E. (1995). Health effects related to releases of hazardous substances on the Superfund priority list. Chemosphere, 31(1), 2455-2461.
15. Hamilton, J. T., & Viscusi, W. K. (1999). Calculating risk? The spatial and political dimensions of hazardous waste policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Hird, J. A. (1993). Environmental policy and equity: The case of Superfund. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 12(2), 323-343.
17. Hird, J. A. (1994). Superfund: The political economy of risk. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
18. Johnson, B. L. (1995). Nature, extent, and impact of Superfund hazardous waste sites. Chemosphere, 31(1), 2415-2428.
19. Johnson, B. L., & De Rosa, C. T. (1997). The toxicological hazard of Superfund hazardous waste sites. Reviews on Environmental Health, 12(4), 235-251.
20. Ketkar, K. (1992). Hazardous waste sites and property values in the state of New Jersey. Applied Economics, 24(6), 647-659.
21. Kohlhase, J. E. (1991). The impact of toxic waste sites on housing values. Journal of Urban Economics, 30(1), 1-26.
22. Lowry, R. C. (1998). All hazardous waste politics is local: Grass-roots advocacy and public participation in siting and cleanup decisions. Policy Studies Journal, 26(4), 748-759.
23. Lubell, M., Schneider, M., Scholz, J. T., & Mete, M. (2002). Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 148-163.
24. Mazmanian, D., & Morell, D. (1992). Beyond superfailure: America's toxics policy for the 1990s. San Francisco: Westview Press.
25. Meier, K. J. (1987). Politics and the bureaucracy: Policymaking in the fourth branch of government. (2nd ed.). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
26. Moe, T. M. (1982). Regulatory performance and presidential administration. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 197-224.
27. Moe, T. M. (1985). Control and feedback in economic regulation: The Case of the NLRB. American Political Science Review, 79, 1094-1116.
28. Rabe, B. G. (1990). Legislative Incapacity-The congressional role in environmental policy-making and the case of Superfund." Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, 15(3), 571-589.
29. Rahm, D. (1998). Controversial cleanup; Superfund and implementation of US hazardous waste policy. Policy Studies Journal, 26(4), 719-734.
30. Revesz, R. L., & Stewart, R. B. Analyzing Superfund: Economics, science, and law. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1995.
31. Ringquist, E. J. (1994). Policy influence and policy responsiveness in state pollution control. Policy Studies Journal, 22(1), 25-43.
32. Ringquist, E. J. (1995). Political control and policy impact in EPAs office of water quality. American Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 336-363.
33. Sigman, H. (1998). Liability funding and Superfund clean-up remedies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 35, 205-224.
34. West, W. F. (1984). Structuring administrative discretion: The pursuit of rationality and responsiveness. American Journal of Political Science, 28(2), 340-360.
35. West, W. F. (1995). Controlling the bureaucracy: Institutional constraints in theory and practice. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
36. Williams, B., & Matheny, A. (1984). Testing theories of social regulation. Journal of Politics, 46, 428-458.
37. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
38. Wood, B. D., & Waterman, R. W. (1993). The dynamics of political-bureaucratic adaptation. American Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 497-528.