Controversial cleanup: Superfund and the implementation of U.S. hazardous waste policy

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 719-734

  Rahm, Dianne ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLEANUP; HAZARDOUS WASTE; SUPERFUND; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032311429     PISSN: 00190292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1998.tb01942.x     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Allard, W. (1997). EPA is blocking sensible superfund reform plan. Roll Call, 43 (42), 17.
2. Anderson, D. (1991). Woodstock meets superfund. Public Management, 73 (5), 7-9.
3. Andrews, R. N. (1997). Risk-based decision making. In N. J. Vig & M. E. Kraft (Eds.), Environmental policy in the 1990s (pp. 208-230). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
4. Applegate, J., & Sarno, D. (1997). FUTURESITE: An environmental remediation game-simulation. Simulation & Gaming, 28 (1), 13-27.
5. Barnett, H. C. (1993). Crimes against the environment: Superfund enforcement at last. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 525, 119-133.
6. Barnett, H. C. (1994). Toxic debts and the superfund dilemma. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
7. Battle, J. B., & Lipeles, M. I. (1993). Environmental law, Vol. 4: Hazardous waste. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
8. Baucus, M. (1997). Superfund reform won't necessarily improve it. Roll Call, 43(42), 18.
9. Browner, C. M. (1997, March 12). Statement of Carol M. Browner, Administrator, USEPA. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, United States House of Representatives. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
10. Church, T. W., & Nakamura, R. T. (1993). Cleaning up the mess: Implementation strategies in superfund. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
11. CQ Almanac. (1980). Congress clears "superfund" legislation. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
12. CQ Almanac. (1986). Reagan signs "superfund" waste-cleanup bill. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
13. CQ Almanac. (1990). Superfund reauthorization. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
14. CQ Almanac. (1996). GOP scraps superfund plan. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
15. Donovan, P. E. (1990). Serving multiple masters: Confronting the conflicting interests that arise in superfund disputes. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 17(2), 371-403.
16. Federal Facilities Policy Group. (1995). Improving federal facilities cleanup. Report of the Federal Facilities Policy Group to the Council on Environmental Quality and the Office of Management and Budget. [On-line.] Available: URL: http:// www.epa.gov/swerffrr/ octscan.htm.
17. Fernald Citizens Task Force. (July 1995). Recommendations on remediation levels, waste disposition, priorities, and future use. Report to the United States Department of Energy. Ross, OH: Fernald Citizens Task Force, A U.S. Department of Energy Site-specific Advisory Board.
18. Fogleman, V. M. (1992). Hazardous waste cleanup, liability, and litigation: A comprehensive guide to superfund law. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
19. Freedman, A. (1997, June 28). Congress prepares new assault on troubled superfund sites. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 55 (26), 3530.
20. Glaser, M., & Cherches, C. (1992). Local government's role in groundwater cleanup. Public Management, 74 (2), 4-10.
21. Harper, R. K., & Adams, S. C. (1996). CERCLA and deep pockets: Market response to the superfund program. Contemporary Economic Policy, 14 (1), 107-115.
22. Hird, J. A. (1994). Superfund: The political economy of environmental risk. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
23. Hosansky, D. (1995). The states' unfunded options. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 53 (4), 278.
24. Huber, P. W. (1988). Liability: The legal revolution and its consequences. New York, NY: Basic Books.
25. International City/County Management Association. (1993). Managing superfund's impact: A first-aid kit. MIS Report, 25(1), 1-37.
26. Johnson R. B. (1991). The impact of liability on innovation in the chemical industry. In P. W. Huber & R. E. Litan (Eds.), The liability maze: The impact of liability law on safety and innovation (pp. 428-455). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
27. Kelly, C. C. (1991). Superfund and local governments: Making the process work. Public Management, 73 (5), 11-13.
28. Kelly, C. C., & Benedict, L. B. (1990). Superfund: What every manager should know. Public Management, 72 (7), 11-15.
29. Kraft, M. E. (1996). Environmental policy and politics. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
30. Kritz, M. (1997, August 9). Feuding with the feds. National Journal, 32, 1598-1601.
31. Levine, A. G. (1982). Love Canal: Science, politics, and people. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
32. Mazmanian, D., & Morell, D. (1992). Beyond superfailure: America's toxic policy for the 1990s. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
33. McElfish, J. M., & Pendergrass, J. (1993, December). Reauthorizing superfund: Lessons from the states. Washington, DC: Environmental Law Institute.
34. National Governors Association. (1994). Reinventing superfund. Washington, DC: National Governors Association.
35. O'Leary, R. (1990). Will hazardous waste cleanups costs cripple our state and local governments? State and Local Government, 22 (2), 84-89.
36. O'Leary, R. (1993). Environmental change: Federal courts and the EPA. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
37. Payne, S. M. (1998). Strategies for accelerating cleanup at toxic waste sites: Fast-tracking environmental actions and decision making. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.
38. P.L. 104-134. (1996, April 26). The Omnibus Consolidated Rescission and Appropriations Act of 1996.
39. Probst, K. N., Fuller, D., Litan, R. E., & Portney, P. R. (1995). Footing the bill for superfund cleanups: Who pays and how? Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution and Resources for the Future.
40. Probst, K. N., & Portney, P. R. (1992). Assigning liability for superfund cleanups: An analysis of policy options. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
41. Reagan, R. (1981, August 20). Executive order 12316: Responses to environmental damage. Federal Register, 46(161), 42237-42240.
42. Revesz, R. L., & Stewart, R. B. (1995). The superfund debate. In R. L. Revesz & R. B. Stewart (Eds.), Analyzing superfund: Economics, science, and law (pp. 3-21). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
43. Skillern, F. F. (1995). Environmental protection deskbook. Colorado Springs, CO: Shepard's/McGraw-Hill.
44. United States Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1989). Facing America's trash: What next for municipal solid waste? Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
45. United States Department of Energy. (1996, January). Closing the circle on the splitting of the atom: The environmental legacy of nuclear weapons production in the United States and what the Department of Energy is doing about it. DOE/EM-0266. Washington, DC: United States Department of Energy.
46. United States Department of Energy. (1997, January). Linking legacies: Connecting the cold war nuclear weapons production processes to their environmental consequences. DOE/EM-0319. Washington, DC: United States Department of Energy.
47. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1984). Hazardous waste sites. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
48. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1990). An analysis of state superfund programs: 50-state study, 1990 update. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
49. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1992, April 29). National oil and hazardous substances pollution contingency plan: Lender liability under CERCLA. Federal Register, 57(83), 18344-18385.
50. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1993, March 2). Notification of policy change: Categorization of superfund sites. Federal Register, 58(39), 12142.
51. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1995, November 1). Notice of policy change: Partial deletion of sites listed on the national priorities list. Federal Register, 60 (211), 55466-55467.
52. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1996a). National remedy review board progress report: Fiscal year 1996. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
53. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1996b, June). Superfund today: Focus on cleanup costs. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
54. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1997a, April 1). NPL for uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. Action: Final rule. Federal Register, 62(62), 15571-15593.
55. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1997b, February). Superfund today: Focus on risk assessment. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
56. United States General Accounting Office. (1996a, March 20). How states establish and apply environmental standards when cleaning up sites. GAO-RCED-96-70FS. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office.
57. United States General Accounting Office. (1996b, March 18). Impact on states of capping superfund sites. GAO-RCED-96-106R. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office.
58. United States General Accounting Office. (1996c, March 27). Potentially responsible parties at superfund sites. GAO-RCED-96-75. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office.
59. Wagner, T. P. (1991). The complete guide to hazardous waste regulations. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
60. Washington State Department of Ecology & United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 10. (1989, May). Hanford federal facility compliance and consent order (tri party agreement). Memorandum of understanding between Washington State Department of Ecology and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10.