A test for patterns of modularity in sequences of developmental events

Evolution

Volumn 58, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1852-1855

  Poe, Steven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

Development; Evolution; Heterochrony; Modularity; Statistical test

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION; HETEROCHRONY (ONTOGENY); PHYLOGENY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ANURA;

EID: 4344703099     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00468.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bolker, J. A. 2000. Modularity in development and why it matters to Evo-Devo. Am. Zool. 40:770-776.
2. Bonner, J. T. 1988. The evolution of complexity. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
4. Gould, S. J. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Hanken, J., T. F. Carl, M. K. Richardson, L. Olson, G. Schlosser, C. K. Osabutey, and M. W. Klymkowsky. 2001. Limb development in a "non- model" vertebrate, the direct-developing frog Eleutherodactylus coqui. J. Exp. Zool. 291:375-388.
6. Harvey, P. H., and M. D. Pagel. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
7. Mabee, P. M., and T. A. Trendler. 1996. Development of the cranium and paired fins in Betta splendens (Teleosti: Percomorpha): intraspecific variation and interspecific comparisons. J. Morphol. 227:249-287.
8. Magwene, P. M. 2001. New tools for studying integration and modularity. Evolution 55:1734-1745.
9. Needham, J. 1933. On the dissociability of the fundamental process in ontogenesis. Biol. Rev. 8:180-223.
10. Nunn, C. L., and K. K. Smith. 1998. Statistical analyses of developmental sequences: the craniofacial region of marsupial and placental mammals. Am. Nat. 152:82-101.
11. Olson, E. C., and R. L. Miller. 1958. Morphological integration. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
12. Pagel, M. 1999. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 48:612-622.
13. Raff, R. 1996. The shape of life. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
14. Richardson, M. K., T. F. Carl, J. Hanken, R. P. Elinson, C. Cope, and P. Bagley. 1998. Limb development and evolution: a frog embryo with no apical ectodermal ridge (AER). J. Anat. 192: 379-390.
15. Schlosser, G. 2001. Using heterochrony plots to detect dissociated coevolution of characters. J. Exp. Zool. 291:282-304.
16. Smith, K. K. 1996. Integration of craniofacial structures during development in mammals. Am. Zool. 36:70-79.
17. _. 2001. Heterochrony revisited: the evolution of developmental sequences. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 73:169-186.
18. Velhagen, W. A. 1997. Analyzing developmental sequences using sequence units. Syst. Biol. 46:204-210.
19. Von Dassow, G., and E. Munro. 1999. Modularity in animal development and evolution: elements of a conceptual framework for EvoDevo. J. Exp. Zool. 285:307-325.
20. Von Dassow, G., E. Meir, E. M. Munro, and G. M. Odell. 2000. The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature 406:188-192.
21. Wolfram, S. 2003. Mathematica. Ver. 5.0. Wolfram Media, Champaign, IL.
22. Zelditch, M. 1987. Evaluating models of developmental integration in the laboratory rat using confirmatory factor analysis. Syst. Zool. 36:368-370.