Mathematics, literacies, and identity

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 333-337

  Cobb, Paul ^a,b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4344697791     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.39.3.5     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. BIEHLER, R., & STEINBRING, H. (1991). Entdeckende Statistik, stenget-und Blatter, Boxplots: Konzepte, Begrundungen and Enfahrungen eines Unterrichtsversuch es [Explorations in statistics, stem-and-leaf, boxplots: Concepts, justifications, and experience in a teaching experiment]. Der Mathtematikunterricht, 37(6), 5-32.
2. BOALER, J. (2002). Paying the price for "Sugar and Spice": Shifting the analytic lens in equity research. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4, 127-145.
3. BOALER, J., & GREENO, J. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematical worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 45-82). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
4. BROWN, A.L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
5. BROWN, C.A., STEIN, M.K., & FORMAN, E.A. (1996). Assisting teachers and students to reform the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31, 63-93.
6. CARRAHER, T.N., CARRAHER, D.W., & SCHLIEMANN, A.D. (1987). Written and oral mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18, 83-97.
7. COBB, P. (1999). Individual and collective mathematical learning: The case of statistical data analysis. Mathematical. Thinking and Learning, 1, 5-44.
8. COBB, P., & BAUERSFELD, H. (Eds.), (1995). Emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. COBB, P., CONFREY, J., DISESSA, A., LEHRER, R., & SCHAUBLE, L. (2003). Design experiments in education research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
10. COBB, P., & HODGE, L.L. (2003, April). An initial contribution to the development of a design theory of mathematical interests: The case of statistical data analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
11. COBB, P., MCCLAIN, K., & GRAVEMEIJER, K. (2003). Learning about statistical covariation. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 1-78.
12. COLLINS, A. (1999). The changing infrastructure of educational research. In E.C. Langemann & L.S. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research (pp. 289-298). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. CONFREY, J., & SMITH, E. (1995). Splitting, covariation, and their role in the development of exponential functions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 66-86.
14. DE ABREU, G. (1995). Understanding how children experience the relationship between home and school mathematics. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2, 119-142.
15. DESIGN-BASED RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
16. GEE, J.P. (1999). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. In W.G. Secada (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 25, pp. 99-125). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
17. GEE, J.P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning literacy. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.
18. GRAVEMEIJER, K. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht, the Netherlands: CD-ß Press.
19. KAPUT, J.J. (1994). The representational roles of technology in connecting mathematics with authentic experience. In R. Biehler, R.W. Scholz, R. Strasser, & B. Winkelmann (Eds.), Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline (pp. 379-397). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
20. LAVE, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. LEHRER, R., STROM, D., & CONFREY, J. (2002). Grounding metaphors and inscriptional resonance: Children's emerging understanding of mathematical similarity. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 359-398.
22. MARTIN, J.B. (2000). Mathematics success and failure among African-American youth. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. MCCLAIN, K. (2002). Teachers' and students' understanding: The role of tool use in communication. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 217-249.
24. MCCLAIN, K., COBB, P., & GRAVEMEIJER, K. (2000). Supporting students' ways of reasoning about data. In M. Burke & F. Curcio (Eds.), Learning mathematics for a new century (pp. 174-187). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
25. MEIRA, L. (1995). The microevolution of mathematical representations in children's activity. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 269-313.
26. MOSES, R.P., KAMII, M., SWAP, S.M., & HOWARD, J. (1989). The Algebra Project: Organizing in the spirit of Ella. Harvard Educational Review, 59, 423-443.
27. MOSS, J., & CASE, R. (1999). Developing children's understanding of the rational numbers: A new model and an experimental curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 122-147.
28. NASIR, N.S. (2002). Identity, goals, and learning: Mathematics in cultural practice. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4, 213-248.
29. SCHOENFELD, A. (1983). Beyond the purely cognitive: Belief systems, social cognitions, and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance. Cognitive Science, 7, 329-363.
30. SCRIBNER, S. (1984). Studying working intelligence. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 9-40). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. SFARD, A. (2002, June). Telling identities: Conceptualizing diversity in terms of identity. Paper presented at the Fifth Congress of the International Society for Cultural Research and Activity Theory, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.