A survey of graduate training in empirically supported and manualized treatments: A preliminary report

Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 230-242

  Karekla, Maria ^a   Lundgren, Jennifer D ^a   Forsyth, John P ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY; COGNITION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EDUCATION; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; TRAINING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 4344684681     PISSN: 10777229     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1077-7229(04)80034-8     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adair, J. G., Paivio, A., & Ritchie, P. (1996). Psychology in Canada. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 341-370.
2. Addis, M. E., & Krasnow, A. D. (2000). A national survey of practicing psychologists' attitudes toward psychotherapy treatment manuals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 331-339.
3. Agresti, A. (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
4. American Psychological Association. (1996). Guidelines and principles for accreditation of programs in professional psychology. Washington, DC: Author.
5. American Psychological Association. (2000). Accredited doctoral programs in professional psychology. American Psychologist, 55, 1473-1486
6. American Psychological Association. (2001a). Characteristics of student affiliates by gender: 1999-2000. Retrieved February 18, 2004, from http://research.apa.org/studentaffiliates.html.
7. American Psychological Association. (2001b). Current major field of APA student affiliates enrolled in doctoral programs by intention to pursue licensure/certification: 1999-2000. APA Research Office, Profiles of APA Student Affiliates, http://research.apa.org/studentaffiliates.htm.
8. Barlow, D. H. (1996a). Health care policy, psychotherapy research, and the future of psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 51, 1050-1058.
9. Barlow, D. H. (1996b). The effectiveness of psychotherapy: Science and policy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 236-240.
10. Belar, C. (1998). Graduate education in clinical psychology: "We're not in Kansas anymore." American Psychologist, 53, 456-464.
11. Beutler, L. E. (1998). Identifying empirically supported treatments: What if we didn't? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 113-120.
12. Beutler, L. E. (2000). David and Goliath: When empirical and clinical standards of practice meet. American Psychologist, 55, 997-1007.
13. Bohart, A. C. (2000). Paradigm clash: Empirically supported treatments versus empirically supported psychotherapy practice. Psychotherapy Research, 10, 488-493.
14. Bohart, A. C., O'Hara, M., & Leitnner, L. M. (1998). Empirically violated treatments: Disenfranchisement of humanistic and other psychotherapies. Psychotherapy Research, 8, 141-157.
15. Borkovec, T. D., & Castonguay, L. G. (1998). What is the scientific meaning of empirically supported therapy? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 136-142.
16. Calhoun, K. S., Moras, K, Pilkonis, P. A., & Rehm, L. P. (1998). Empirically supported treatments: Implications for training. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 151-162.
17. Chambless, D. L. (1999). Empirically validated treatments: What now? Applied and Preventive Psychology, 8, 281-284.
18. Chambless, D. L., Baker, M. J., Baucom, D. H., Beutler, L., Calhoun, K. S., Crits-Christoph, P., Daiuto, A., DeRubeis, R., Detweiler, J., Haaga, D. A. F., Johnson, S. B., McCurry, S., Mueser, K. T., Pope, K. S., Sanderson, W. C., Shoham, V., Stickle, T., Williams, D. A., & Woody, S. R. (1998). Update on empirically validated therapies, II. The Clinical Psychologist, 51, 3-16.
19. Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 7-18.
20. Chambless, D. L., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 685-716.
21. Chambless, D. L., Sanderson, W. C., Shoham, V., Bennett Johnson, S., Pope, K. S., Crits-Christoph, P., Baker, M., Johnson, B., Woody, S. R., Sue, S., Beutler, L., Williams, D. A., & McCurry, S. (1996). An update on empirically validated therapies. The Clinical Psychologist, 49, 5-18.
22. Committee on Accreditation. (2000). Accredited doctoral programs in professional psychology: 2000. American Psychologist, 55, 1473-1486.
23. Crits-Christoph, P., Frank, E., Chambless, D. L., Brody, C., & Karp, J. F. (1995). Training in empirically validated treatments: What are clinical psychology students learning? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 514-522.
24. Davison, G. C. (1998). Being bolder with the Boulder model: The challenge of education and training in empirically supported treatments. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 163-167.
25. Davison, G. C., & Lazarus, A. A. (1995). The dialectics of science and practice. In S. C. Hayes, V. M. Follette, R. M. Dawes, & K. E. Grady (Eds.), Achieving standards of psychological practice: Issues and recommendations (pp. 95-120). Reno, NV: Context Press.
26. Garfield, S. L. (1996). Some problems associated with validated forms of psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 218-229.
27. Hayes, S. C., Barlow, D. H., & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (1999). The scientist practitioner: Research and accountability in the age of managed care (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
28. Hayes, S. C., Follette, V. M., Dawes, R. M., & Grady, K. E. (Eds.). (1995). Scientific standards of psychological practice: Issues and recommendations. Reno, NV: Context Press.
29. Hays, K. A., Rardin, D. K., Jarvis, P. A., Taylor, N. M., Moorman, A. S., & Armstead, C. D. (2002). An exploratory survey on empirically supported treatments: Implications for internship training. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 207-211.
30. Horan, W. P., & Blanchard, J. J. (2001). Training opportunities in empirically supported treatments and their relationship to intern recruitment and post-internship placement: A survey of directors of internship training. Clinical Science (Winter), 1-10.
31. Jaccard, J. (1998). Interaction effects in factorial analysis of variance. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. Kendall, P. C. (1998). Directing misperceptions: Researching the issues facing manual-based treatments. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5, 396-399.
33. Kyle, T. M., & Williams, S. (2000). Results of the 1998-1999 APA survey of graduate departments in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34. Lazarus, A. A. (1967). In support of technical eclecticism. Psychological Reports, 21, 415-416.
35. Lazarus, A. A. (1989). The practice of multimodal therapy: Systematic, comprehensive, and effective psychotherapy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36. Lazarus, A. A. (1996). The utility and futility of combining treatments in psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 59-68.
37. Marques, C. C. (1998). The evolution of managed behavioral health care: A psychologists' perspective on the role of psychology. In A. S. Bellack & M. Hersen (Eds.), Comprehensive clinical psychology: Vol. 1, foundations of clinical psychology (pp. 411-421). New York: Pergamon.
38. McFall, R. M. (1991). Manifesto for a science of clinical psychology. The Clinical Psychologist, 44, 75-88.
39. McFall, R. M. (2000). Elaborate reflections on a simple manifesto. Journal of Applied and Preventive Psychology, 9, 5-21.
40. Morgan, D. L., & Morgan, R. K. (2001). Single-participant research design: Bringing science to managed care. American Psychologist, 56, 119-127.
41. Norcross, J. C. (1999). Collegially validated limitations of empirically validated treatments. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 472-476.
42. Norcross, J. C., Karg, R. S., & Prochaska, J. O. (1997). Clinical psychologists in the 1990s: Part I. The Clinical Psychologist, 50, 4-9.
43. O'Donohue, W., Buchanan, J. A., & Fisher, J. E. (2000). Characteristics of empirically supported treatments. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 9, 69-74.
44. Ollendick, T. H. (1999). Empirically supported treatments: Promises and pitfalls. The Clinical Psychologist, 52, 1-3.
45. Persons, J. B. (1995). Why practicing psychologists are slow to adopt empirically-validated treatments. In S. C. Hayes & V. M. Follette (Eds.), Scientific standards of psychological practice: Issues and recommendations (pp. 141-157). Reno, NV: Context Press.
46. Seligman, M. E. P. (1996). Science as an ally of practice. American Psychologist, 51, 1072-1079.
47. Sobell, L. C. (1996). Bridging the gap between scientists and practitioners: The challenge before us. Behavior Therapy, 27, 297-320.
48. Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures. (1995). Training in and dissemination of empirically validated psychological procedures: Report and recommendations. The Clinical Psychologist, 48, 3-23.
49. Weisz, J. R., Hawley, K. M., Pilkonis, P. A., Woody, S. R., & Follette, W. C. (2000). Stressing the (other) three Rs in the search for empirically supported treatments. Review procedures, research quality, relevance to practice and the public interest. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7, 243-258.
50. Wilson, G. T. (1996). Manual-based treatments: The clinical application of research findings. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 295-314.
51. Wilson, G. T. (1997). Treatment manuals in clinical practice. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 205-210.