Experiences in methods to involve key players in planning protective actions in the case of a nuclear accident

Radiation Protection Dosimetry

Volumn 109, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 127-132

  Sinkko, Kari ^a   Hamalainen R P ^b   Hanninen R ^a  

^a STUK RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY   (Finland)

^b AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RADIOISOTOPE;

AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; COMPETENCE; DECISION MAKING; EXPERIENCE; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INDUSTRY; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; NUCLEAR ACCIDENT; PLANNING; RADIATION PROTECTION; WORKSHOP;

ACCIDENTS, RADIATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, MANAGEMENT; DISASTER PLANNING; EMERGENCIES; EUROPEAN UNION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERINSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; LEADERSHIP; POWER PLANTS; RADIATION PROTECTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SAFETY MANAGEMENT; TEACHING;

EID: 4344683491     PISSN: 01448420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nch258     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Renn, O., Webler, T. and Wiedermann, P. Eds Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers) (1995).
2. Susskind, L. and Field, P. Dealing with an Angry Public: The Mutual Gains Approach to Resolving Disputes. (New York: The Free Press) (1996).
3. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Protection of the public in situations of prolonged radiation exposure. ICRP Publication 82 (Oxford: Pergamon Press) (2000).
4. Gregory, R., Lichtenstein, S. and Slovic, P. Valuing environmental resources: a constructive approach. J. Risk Uncertain 7, 177-197 (1993).
5. McDaniels, T. and Roessler, G. Multiattribute elicitation of wilderness preservation benefits: a constructive approach. Ecol. Econ. 27, 299-312, (1998).
6. Hämäläinen, R. P. and Leikola, O. Spontaneous decision conferencing in parliamentary negotiations. In: Proceedings of the 27th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, 4-7 January (1995) IV (HAWAI, IEEE Computer Society press), 290-299 (1995).
7. Goodwin, P. and Wright, G. Decision Analysis for Management Judgement. (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons) (1992).
8. Marttunen, M. and Hämäläinen, R. P. Decision analysis interviews in environmental impact assessment. Eur. J. Operation. Res. 87, 551-563 (1995).
9. McDaniels, T. The structured value referendum: eliciting preferences for environmental policy alternatives. J. Policy Anal. Manage, 15(2), 227-251 (1996).
10. Apostolakis, G. and Pickett, S. Deliberation: integrating analytical results into environmental decisions involving multiple stakeholders. Risk Anal. 18(5), 621-634 (1998).
11. Hämäläinen, R. P. Computer assisted energy policy analysis in the Parliament of Finland. Interfaces 18(4), 12-23 (1988).
12. Hämäläinen, R. P. Facts or values - how do parliamentarians and experts see nuclear power. Energy Policy 19(5), 464-472 (1991).
13. Keeney, R. L. and von Winterfelt, D. Managing nuclear waste from power plants. Risk Anal. 14(1), 107-130 (1994).
14. Keeney, R. L. Siting Energy Facilities (New York: Academic Press) (1980).
15. Ahlbrecht, M., Borodin, R., Borzenko V, Ehrhardt, J., French, S., Shershakov, V., Sohier, A., Trakhtengerts, E., and Verbruggen, A. Decision support issues in RODOS: the needs of decision makers. Radiat. Prot. Dosimet. 73(1-4), 81-84 (1997).
16. International Atomic Energy Agency. The International Chernobyl Project. (Vienna: IAEA) (1991).
17. Zeevaert, Th., Bousher, A., Brendler, V., Hedemann-Jensen, P. and Nordlinder, S. Evaluation and ranking of restoration strategies for radioactively contaminated sites. J. Environ. Radioact. 56, 33-50 (2001).
18. International Atomic Energy Agency. Intervention criteria in a nuclear or radiation emergency. (IAEA Safety Series, No. 109 (Vienna: IAEA) (1994).
19. Nisbet, A. and Mercer, J. Food and agriculture restoration management involving network groups (the FARMING network). Radioprot. Colloques 37(C1), 1099-1104 (2002).
20. French, S., Walmod-Larsen, O. and Sinkko, K. Decision conferencing on countermeasures after a large nuclear accident: report of an exercise by the BER-3 of the NKS BER programme. Riso-R-676 (EN), Roskilde (1993).
21. French, S., Finck, R., Hämäläinen, R. P., Naadland, E., Roed, J., Salo, A. and Sinkko, K. Nordic decision conference: an exercise on clean-up actions in an urban environment after a nuclear accident. STUK-A132, Helsinki (1996).
22. Hämäläinen, R. P., Sinkko K, Lindstedt, M., Ammann, M. and Salo, A. RODOS and decision conferencing on early phase protective actions in Finland. STUK-A159, Helsinki (1998).
23. Hämäläinen, R. P., Sinkko, K., Lindstedt, M., Ammann, M. and Salo, A. Decision analysis interviews on protective actions in Finland supported by the RODOS system. STUK-A173, Helsinki (2000).
24. Ammann, M., Sinkko, K., Kostiainen, E., Salo, A., Liskola, K., Hämäläinen, R. P. and Mustajoki, J. Decision Analysis of Countermeasures for the Milk Pathway after an Accidental Release of Radionuclides. STUK-A186, Helsinki (2001).
25. Lowry, K., Adler, P. and Milner, N. Participating the public: group process, politics, and planning. J. Plan. Educat. Res. 16, 177-187 (1997).