Deliberation: Integrating analytical results into environmental decisions involving multiple stakeholders

Risk Analysis

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 621-634

  Apostolakis, George E ^a   Pickett, Susan E ^a  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

Author keywords

Deliberation; Remediation; Risk assessment; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING; MANAGEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT;

REMEDIATION;

DECISION MAKING;

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ARTICLE; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; LABORATORY; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0032191538     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb00375.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. National Research Council, Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1996).
2. L. Susskind and P. Field, Dealing with an Angry Public: The Mutual Gains Approach to Resolving Disputes (The Free Press, New York, 1996)
3. S Jasanoff, "Bridging the Two Cultures of Risk Analysis," Risk Anal 13, 123-129 (1993).
4. H. Kunreuther and P. Slovic, "Science, Values, and Risk," Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc Sci. 545, 116-125 (1996).
5. National Research Council, Building Consensus Through Risk Assessment and Management of the Department of Energy's Environmental Remediation Program (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1994).
6. Advanced Sciences, Inc., Beta Corporation International, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, New Mexico State University, and QuantiSci, Inc., 1997, Risk Communication, Assessment, and Management at Hazardous Waste Sites, Final Report to the Department of Energy (in preparation).
7. P. Slovic, "Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk Assessment Battlefield," in D. Messick, A. Tenbrunsel, and K. Wade-Benzoni (eds.), Psychological Perspectives to Environment and Ethics in Management (Josey Bass, San Francisco, 1996).
8. Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management, Framework for Environmental Health Risk Management, Final Report, Vol. 1 (1997).
9. O. Renn, T. Webler, H Rakel, P. Dienel, and B. Johnson, "Public Participation in Decision Making: A Three-Step Procedure," Policy Sci. 26, 189-214 (1993).
10. J. Crowfoot and J. Wondolleck, "Environmental Dispute Settlement," in J. Crowfoot and J. Wondolleck (eds.), Environmental Disputes (Island Press, Washington, D.C., 1990).
11. L. Susskind and L. Dunlap, "The Importance of Non-Objective Judgments in Environmental Impact Assessment," Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2, 335-366 (1981).
12. J. F. Dimento, Environmental Law and American Business (Plenum Press, New York, 1986).
13. L. Susskind and J. Cruikshank, Breaking the Impasse (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987).
14. M. W. Merkhofer and R. L. Keeney, "A Multiattribute Analysis of Alternative Sites for the Disposal of Nuclear Waste," Risk Anal. 7, 173-194 (1987).
15. R. L. Keeney and D. von Winterfeldt, "Managing Nuclear Waste from Power Plants," Risk Anal. 14, 107-130 (1994).
16. Y. Hong and G. Apostolakis, "Conditional Influence Diagrams in Risk Management," Risk Anal. 13, 625-636 (1993).
17. R. L. Keeney, "Analysis of Preference Dependencies among Objectives," Oper. Res. 29, 1105-1120 (1981).
18. R. Gregory, and R. L. Keeney, "Creating Policy Alternatives Using Stakeholder Values," Mgmt. Sci. 40, 1035-1048 (1994).
19. R. T. Clemen, Making Hard Decisions. An Introduction to Decision Analysis (Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA, 1991).
20. W. Edwards, D von Winterfeldt, and D. L. Moody, "Simplicity in Decision Analysis: An Example and a Discussion," in D. E. Bell, H. Raiffa, and A. Tversky (eds.), Decision Making. Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1988).
21. T. L. Saaty, "Risk - Its Priority and Probability: The Analytic Hierarchy Process," Risk Anal. 7, 159-172 (1987).
22. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, (RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 1996).
23. R. D. Holder, "Some Comments on the Analytic Hierarchy Process," J. Oper. Res. Soc. 41, 1073-1076 (1990).
24. E. H. Forman, "Facts and Fictions About the Analytic Hierarchy Process," in T. L. Saaty (eds.), The Analytic Hierarchy Process (RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 1996).
25. T. L Saaty, "Rank Generation, Preservation and Reversal in the Analytic Hierarchy Decision. Process," Decision Sci. 18, 157-177 (1987).
26. W. R. Hughes, "Deriving Utilities Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 20, 393-395 (1986).
27. G. J. Klir, and B. Yuan, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic (Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1995).
28. M. Kazarians, G. Apostolakis. and N. Siu, "Risk Management Application of Fire Risk Analysis," in C. E. Grant and P. J. Pagni (eds ), Fire Safety Science - Proceedings of the First International Symposium, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD, October 7-11. (Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York, 1985), pp, 1039-1046.
29. R. Fisher and W. Ury, Getting to Yes (Penguin Books, New York, 1991).