Macro economic determinants of antidumping: A comparative analysis of developed and developing countries

World Development

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1043-1057

  Aggarwal, Aradhna ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELHI   (India)

^b Indian Council Res on Intl Econ   (India)

Author keywords

Antidumping; Developed countries; Developing countries; Political economy approach; Trade protection

Indexed keywords

ANTIDUMPING; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; MACROECONOMICS; TRADE RELATIONS; WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION;

EID: 4344677700     PISSN: 0305750X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aggarwal, A. (2002). Antidumping law and practice: An Indian perspective. ICRIER Working Paper 85, New Delhi, India
2. Aggarwal, A. (2003). The WTO anti-dumping code: Issues for review in post Doha negotiations. ICRIER Working Paper 99, New Delhi, India
3. Baldwin R. Trade policies in developed countries In: Jones R.W. & Kenen P.B. (Eds.), Handbook of international economics Vol. 1 1984 571-619 Elsevier Science Publishers Boston
4. Becker B. & Theuringer M. Macroeconomic determinants of contingent protection: The case of the EU Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik 50 3 2001
5. Blonigen B.A. & Bown C. Anti-dumping and retaliation threats Journal of International Economics 60 2 2003 249-273
6. Bourgeois, J. H. J. & Messerlin, P. A. (1998). The European communities experience. Brookings Trade Policy Forum
7. Caves R. Economic models of political choice: Canada's tariff structure Canadian Journal of Economics 6 1 1976 187-210
8. Coughlin C.C. Terza J.V. & Khalifah N.A. The determinants of escape clause petitions Review of Economics and Statistics 71 May 1989 341-347
9. Feigenbaum S. & Willet T.D. Domestic versus international influences on protectionist pressures in the United States In: Arndt S.W. Sweez R.J. & Willets T.D. (Eds.), Exchange rates trades, and the US economy 1985 181-190 American Enterprise Institute and Ballinger Publishing Company Cambridge, MA
10. Feinberg R.M. Exchange rates and unfair trade Review of Economic and Statistics 71 1989 1989 704-707
11. Feinberg R.M. & Hirsch B.T. Industry rent seeking and the filing of "unfair trade" complaints International Journal of Industrial Organisation 7 1989 1989 325-340
12. Finger J.M. The industry-country incidence of "less than fair value" cases in US import trade Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 21 1981 260-279
13. Finger J.M. (Ed.), Antidumping: How it works and who gets hurt 1993 University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor, MI
14. Hansen W.L. International trade commission and the policies of protectionism American Political Science Review 84 1990 21-46
15. Herander M.G. & Schwartz J.B. An empirical test of the impact of the threat of US trade policy: The case of antidumping duties Southern Economic Journal 51 1984 59-79
16. Holden, M. (1998). Antidumping: A reaction to trade liberalisation or anti competitive? Mimeo, School of Economics and Management, University of Natal, Durban
17. Hufbauer, G. C. (1999). Anti-dumping: A look at US experience - lessons for Indonesia. Institute for International Economics for the Ministry of Industry and Trade Republic of Indonesia, August 20
18. Hutton S. Trebilcock M. An empirical study of the application of Canadian anti-dumping laws: A search for normative rationales Journal of World Trade 123 4 1990
19. Knetter M.M. & Prusa T.J. Macroeconomic factors and anti-dumping filings: Evidence from four countries Journal of International Economics 61 1 2003 1-17
20. Krishna, R. (1997). Antidumping in law and practice. World Bank Working Paper 1823, The World Bank, Washington, DC
21. Krupp C. Antidumping cases in the US chemical industry: A panel data approach Journal of Industrial Economics 42 1994 299-311
22. Leclerc J.M. Reforming anti-dumping law: Balancing and interests of consumers and domestic industries Mc Gill Law Journal 44 1999 113-139
23. Leidy, M. P. (1997). Macroeconomic conditions and pressures for protection under antidumping and countervailing duty laws: Empirical evidence from the United States. IMF Working Paper 44, March 1
24. Lichtenberg F. & Tan H. An industry-level analysis of import relief petitions filed by US manufacturers, 1958-1985 In: Tan H. & Shimada H. (Eds.), Troubled industries in the United States and Japan 1994 161-188 St. Martin's Press New York
25. Low P. Trading free: The GATT and US trade policy 1993 The Twentieth Century Fund Press New York, NY
26. Mayda, A. M., & Rodrik, D. (2001). Why are some people and countries more protectionist than others. NBER Working Paper 8461, September
27. Messerlin P.A. & Tharakan P.K.M. The question of contingent protection The World Economy 22 9 1999 1251-1270
28. Miranda J. Torres R.A. & Ruiz M. The international use of antidumping: 1987-1997 Journal of World Trade 32 5 1998 5-71
29. O'Rourke K.H. & Sinnott R. The determinants of individual trade policy preferences: International survey evidence In: Collins S.M. & Rodrik D. (Eds.), Brookings trade forum 2001 2001 157-206 Brookings Institute Press Washington, DC
30. Prusa T.J. On the spread and impact of anti-dumping Canadian Journal of Economics 34 3 2001 591-611
31. Prusa T.J. & Skeath S. The economic and strategic motives for antidumping filings Weltwirtschaftliches 138 3 2002 389-413
32. Roitinger A. Preserving trade policy flexibility in anti-dumping reform Aussenwirtschaft 58 3 2003 353-381
33. Rowe - Maw (2001). Global protection report 2001, April 2001
34. Sabry F. An analysis of the decision to file, the dumping estimates and the outcome of antidumping petition International Trade Journal 14 2000 109-145
35. Salvatore D. Import penetration, exchange rates and protectionism in the United States Journal of Policy Modelling 9 Spring 1987 125-141
36. Schott J. The uruguay round: An assessment 1994 Institute for International Economics Washington, DC
37. Shin H.J. The nature of US antidumping cases in the 1980s 1994 Mimeo, Yale University New Haven, CT
38. Takacs W. Pressures for protection: An empirical analysis Economic Inquiry 19 October 1981 687-693
39. Tavares, de A. J., Jr. (1995). The political economy of protection: After the Uruguay round. CEPAL Review 55, Santiago, Chile
40. Tharakan P.K.M. Political economy of contingent protection The Economic Journal 105 433 1995 1550-1564
41. Tharakan P.K.M. Is anti-dumping here to stay? The World Economy 22 1999 179-206
42. Tharakan P.K.M. Waelbroeck J. Anti-dumping and countervailing duty decisions in the E.C., in the US: An experiment in comparative political economy European Economic Review 38 1994 171-193
43. Willig D.R. Economic effects of antidumping policy In: Lawerence R.Z. (Eds.), Brookings trade forum, 1998 1998 The Brookings Institution Washington, DC
44. World Bank (2000). World development indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank