An analysis of the decision to file, the dumping estimates, and the outcome of antidumping petitions

International Trade Journal

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 109-145

  Sabry, Faten ^a  

^a NERA ECONOMIC CONSULTING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996755475     PISSN: 08853908     EISSN: 15210545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/088539000271818     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson, K., 1993. “Agency Discretion or Statutory Direction: Decision Making at the ITC.” Journal of Law and Economics XXXVI:10-28.
2. Baldwin, D., 1993. Neo realism and Neo liberalism. Columbia University Press, New York.
3. Baldwin, R., 1985. The Political Economy of U.S. Import Policy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Baldwin, R. and M. Moore, 1991. “Political Aspects of the Administration of the Trade Remedy Laws,” in Down in the Dumps. Boltuck, R. and R. Litan, Eds., The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.
5. Boltuck, R. and R. Litan, 1991. Down in the Dumps. The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.
6. Boyes, W. J., D. L. Hoffman, and S. A. Low, 1989. “An Econometric Analysis of the Bank Credit Scoring Problem,” Journal of Econometrics 40:3-14.
7. Cass, R. and S. Narkin, 1991. “Antidumping Law and Countervailing Duty Law: The United States and the GATT,” in Down in the Dumps. Boltuck, R. and R. Litan, Eds., The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.
8. Congressional Budget Office (CBO). 1994. “How the GATT Affects U.S. Antidumping and Counter-vailling Duty Policy.” CBO, Washington, D.C.
9. Finger, J. M., K. Hall, and D. Nelson, 1982. “The Political Economy of Administered Protection.” American Economic Review 72:452-466.
10. Goldstein, J., 1993. Ideas, Interests and American Trade Policy. Cornell University Press
11. Goldstein, J. and S. A. Lenway, 1989. “Interests or Institutions: An Inquiry into Congressional-ITC Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 33:303-327.
12. Greene, W. H., 1993. Econometric Analysis. Macmillan Publishing Company.
13. Hansen, W. L., 1990. “The International Trade Commission and Politics of Protectionism.” American Political Science Review 84:21-45.
14. Heckman, J. J., 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error,” Econometrica 47:153-161.
15. Herander M. and B. Schwartz, 1984. “An Empirical Test of the Impact of the Threat of U.S. Trade Policy: The Case of Antidumping Duties.” Southern Economic Journal: 200-227.
16. Hughes, J. W. and E. A. Snyder, 1989. “Policy Analysis of Medical Malpractice Reforms: What Can We Learn from Claims Data?” Journal of Business & Economics Statistics 7:424-431.
17. International Trade Reporter, May 8, 1996. 13(19):748-755.
18. Jackson, J. H., 1989. The World Trading System. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
19. Maddala, G. S., 1983. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press.
20. Moore, M., 1992. “Rules or Politics? An Empirical Analysis of ITC Antidumping Decisions.” Economic Inquiry 30(3):444-466.
21. Mueller, D., 1994. “Antidumping.” Business America:15-16.
22. Prussa, T., 1988. International Trade Policies, Incentives, and Firm Behavior, Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
23. Prussa, T., 1992. “Why Are So Many Antidumping Petitions Withdrawn?” Journal of International Economics 33 (1-2):1-20.
24. Staiger, R. and F. Wolak, 1994a. “The Trade Effects of Antidumping Law: Theory and Evidence,” In Analytical and Negotiating Issues in the Global Trading System, Deardorff, A. and R. Stern, Eds., The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
25. Staiger, R. and F. Wolak, 1994b. “Measuring Industry Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States,” University of Wisconsin working paper, Madison, Wisconsin.
26. Van De Ven, W. and B. M. S. Praag, 1981. “The Demand for Deductibles in Private Health Insurance.” Journal ofEconometrics 17:229-252.
27. U.S. International Trade Commission Fiscal Year 1995 Annual Report (Publication 2979) September 1996.