Implementing change within a school science department: Progressive and dissonant voices

Research in Science Education

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 299-317

  Rigano, Donna L ^a   Ritchie, Stephen M ^a  

^a JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4344659252     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025483130881     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Baird, J. R., & Northfield, J. R. (Eds.). (1992). Learning from the PEEL experience. Melbourne, Vic: Monash University.
2. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 249-305 . Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
3. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1994). Telling teaching stories. Teacher Education Quarterly, 20(1), 145-158.
4. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
5. Dimmock, C., & Lee C.-K. (2000). Redesigning school-based curriculum leadership: A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 15(4), 332-358.
6. Education Queensland (1999). Years 1-10 science professional development and training (CD-ROM). Milton, Qld: The State of Queensland (Department of Education).
7. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
8. Erickson, F. (1998). Qualitative research methods for science education. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1155-1173). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9. Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (Eds.). (1992). Teacher development and educational change. London: The Falmer Press.
10. Gallagher, J. J. (1993). Secondary science teachers and constructivist practice. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 181-191). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
12. Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of science teaching and learning of science in Australian schools (A research report). Canberra, ACT: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
13. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age. London: Cassell.
14. Hargreaves, A. (1996). Revisiting voice. Educational Researcher, 25(1), 12-19.
15. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1997). Active interviewing. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 114-129). London: Sage Publications.
16. Ingvarson, L., & Wright, J. (1999). Science teachers are developing their own standards. Australian Science Teachers' Journal, 45(4), 27-34.
17. Keys, C. R., & Kang, N. (2000, April). Secondary science teachers' beliefs about inquiry: A starting place for reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
18. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage Publications.
19. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
20. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21. Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317-328.
22. Pajares, J. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307-332.
23. Queensland School Curriculum Council (QSCC). (1999). Years 1 to 10 science syllabus. Brisbane, Qld: QSCC.
24. Rigano, D. L., & Ritchie, S. M. (1999). Learning the craft: A student teacher's story. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 27(2), 127-142. Rigano, D. L., & Ritchie, S. M. (1999). Learning the craft: A student teacher's story. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 27(2), 127-142.
25. Riley, K. (2000). Leadership, learning and systemic reform. The Journal of Educational Change, 1(1), 29-55.
26. Ritchie, S. M. (1999). The craft of intervention: A personal practical theory for a teacher's within-group interactions. Science Education, 83(2), 213-231.
27. Ritchie, S. M., & Rigano, D. L. (2001). Researcher-participant positioning in classroom research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(6), 741-756.
28. Ritchie, S. M., & Rigano, D. L. (2002). Discourses about a teacher's self-initiated change in praxis: Storylines of care and support. International Journal of Science Education, 24(10), 1079-1094.
29. Ritchie, S. M., & Rigano, D. L. (2003). Leading by example within a collaborative staff. In J. Wallace & J. Loughran (Eds.), Leadership and professional development in science education: New possibilities for enhancing teacher learning (pp. 48-62). London: Routledge-Falmer.
30. Ritchie, S. M., Rigano, D. L., & Lowry, R. J. (2000). Shifting power relations in 'the getting of wisdom.' Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(2), 165-177.
31. Roth, W.-M. (2001). Becoming-in-the-classroom: Learning to teach in/as praxis. In D. R. Lavoie & W.-M. Roth (Eds.), Models of science teacher preparation. Theory into practice (pp. 11-30). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
32. Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Schaller, J. S., & Tobin, K. (1998). Quality criteria for the genres of interpretive research. In J. A. Malone, B. Atweh, & J. R. Northfield (Eds.), Research and supervision in mathematics and science education (pp. 39-60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Silva, D. Y., Gimbert, B., & Nolan, J. (2000). Sliding the doors: Locking and unlocking possibilities for teacher leadership. Teachers College Record, 102(4), 779-804.
35. Simmons, P. E., Emery, A., Carter, T., Coker, T., Finnegan, B., Crockett, D. et al. (1999). Beginning teachers: Beliefs and classroom actions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 930-954.
36. Siskin, L. S. (1994). Realms of knowledge: Academic departments in secondary schools. Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.
37. Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23-28.
38. Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. (1996). Cultural myths as constraints to the enacted science curriculum. Science Education, 80, 223-241.
39. Wignall, R. (1998). Challenges for interpretivist inquiry. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, XLIV(3), 302-319.
40. Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131-175.