How can the genetic risks of embryo donation be minimized? Proposed guidelines of the French Federation of CECOS (Centre d'Etude et de Conservation des Oeufs et du Sperme)

Human Reproduction

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1685-1688

  Eydoux, Patrice ^a   Thepot, François ^a   Fellmann, Florence ^a   Francannet, Christine ^a   Simon Bouy, Brigitte ^a   Jouannet, Pierre ^a   Bresson, Jean Luc ^a   Siffroi, Jean Pierre ^a  

^a Bureau de la Commission de Genetique   (France)

Author keywords

CECOS; Embryo donation; Genetic guidelines; Genetic risks; Infertility

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; EMBRYO; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FRANCE; GAMETE; GENETIC RISK; GENETIC SCREENING; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INFERTILITY; MATERNAL AGE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; RECIPIENT; REPRODUCTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK REDUCTION; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

EID: 4344644181     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh328     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2002a) Guidelines for gamete and embryo donation. Fertil Steril 77, Suppl 5, S9-S10 S13-S14.
2. American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2002b) Minimal genetic screening for gamete donors. Fertil Steril 77, Suppl 5, S15-S16.
3. Appleton TC (2002) Embryo donation. In Boivin J and Kentenich H (eds) Guidelines for counseling in infertility. ESHRE Monographs Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 35-36.
4. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law. (2002) Gamete and embryo donation. Hum Reprod 17, 1407-1408.
5. Hoffman DI, Zellman GL, Fair CC, Mayer JF, Zeitz JG, Gibbons WE and Turner TG (2003) Cryopreserved embryos in the United States and their availability for research. Fertil Steril 79, 1063-1069.
6. Jalbert P, Leonard C, Selva J and David G (1989) Genetic aspects of artificial insemination with donor semen: the French CECOS Federation guidelines. Am J Med Genet 33, 269-275.
7. Kingsberg SA, Applegarth LD and Janata JW (2000) Embryo donation programs and policies in North America: survey results and implications for health and mental health professionals. Fertil Steril 73, 215-220.
8. Kornafel KL and Sauer MV (1994) Increased rates of aneuploidy in older women. Increased rates of aneuploidy do not occur in gestations of older embryo recipients. Hum Reprod 9, 1981-1982.
9. Le Lannou D, Thepot F and Jouannet P (1998) Multicentre approaches to donor insemination in the French CECOS Federation: nationwide evaluation, donor matching, screening for genetic diseases and consanguinity. Hum Reprod 13 (Suppl 2), 35-49.
10. Newton CR, McDermid A, Tekpetey F and Tummon IS (2003) Embryo donation: attitudes toward donation procedures and factors predicting willingness to donate. Hum Reprod 18, 878-884.
11. Robertson JA (1995) Ethical and legal issues in human embryo donation. Fertil Steril 64, 885-894.
12. Sheffer-Mimouni G, Mashiach S, Dor J, Levran D and Seidman DS (2002) Factors influencing the obstetric and perinatal outcome after oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 17, 2636-2640.
13. Söderström-Anttila V, Foudila T, Ripatti UR and Siegberg R (2001) Embryo donation: outcome and attitudes among donors and recipients. Hum Reprod 16, 1120-1128.
14. Van Voorhis BJ, Grinstead DM, Sparks AET, Gerard JL and Weir RF (1999) Establishment of a successful donor embryo program: medical, ethical and policy issues. Fertil Steril 71, 604-608.