Multicentre approaches to donor insemination in the French CECOS Federation: Nationwide evaluation, donor matching, screening for genetic diseases and consanguinity

Human Reproduction

Volumn 13, Issue SUPPL. 2, 1998, Pages 35-54

  Le Lannou, Dominique ^a   Thépot, François ^b   Jouannet, Pierre ^c  

^a RENNES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b AMIENS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c Hôpital Cochin ^*  (France)

Author keywords

Consanguinity; Donor insemination; Frozen donor semen; Genetic diseases; Sperm banks

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSANGUINITY; FERTILITY; GENETIC DISORDER; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; KARYOTYPING; MULTICENTER STUDY; SPERM; SPERM DONOR;

EID: 0031861652     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.35     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (62)

1. Adair, A. and Purdie, A. (1996) Donor insemination programmes with personal donors: issues of secrecy. Hum. Reprod., 11, 2558-2563.
2. American Fertility Society (1990) New guidelines for the use of semen donor insemination. Fertil. Steril., 53 (Suppl. 1), 1S.
3. American Fertility Society (1993) Guidelines for gametes donation. Fertil. Steril., 59 (Suppl.), 1S-9S.
4. Auger, J., Kunstmann, J.M., Czyglik, F. and Jouannet, P. (1995) Decline in semen quality among fertile men in Paris during the past 20 years. N. Engl. J. Med., 332, 281-285.
5. Baird, P.A., Sadovnick, A.D. and Yee, I.M.L. (1991) Maternal age and birth defects: a population study. Lancet, 337, 527-530.
6. Barratt, C.L.R., Chauhan, M. and Cooke, I.D. (1990) Donor insemination a look to the future. Fertil. Steril., 54, 375-382.
7. Berger, D.M., Eisen, A., Shuber, J. and Doody, K.F. (1986) Psychological patterns in donor inseminations couples. Can. J. Psychiatry, 31, 818-823.
8. Bertrand-Servais, M., Letur-Konirsch, M., Raoul-Duval, A. and Frydman, R. (1993) Psychological considerations of anonymous oocyte donation. Hum. Reprod., 8, 874-879.
9. Bonduelle, M., Legein, J., Buysse, A. et al. (1996) Prospective follow-up study of 423 children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum. Reprod., 11, 1558-1564.
10. Bonduelle, M., Wilikens, A., Buysse, A., et al. (1996) Prospective follow-up of 877 children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ISCI) with ejaculated epididymal and testicular spermatozoa and after replacement of cryopreserved embryos obtained afetr ISCI. Hum. Reprod. 11 (Suppl. 4), 131-159.
11. Bordson, B.L. and Leonardo, V.S. (1991) The appropriate upper age limit for semen donors: a review of the genetic effect of paternal age. Fertil. Steril., 56, 397-401.
12. British Andrology Society (1993) Guidelines for the screening of semen donors for donor insemination. Hum. Reprod., 8, 1521-1523.
13. Brock, D.J.H. (1994) Carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. Prenat. Diagn., 14, 1243-1252.
14. Chauhan, M., Barratt, C.L., Cooke, S.M.S. and Cooke, I.D. (1989) Differences in the fertility of donor insemination recipients - a study to provide pronostic guidelines as to its success and outcome. Fertil. Steril., 51, 815-819.
15. Clamar, A. (1980) Psychological implications of donor insemination. Am. J. Psychoanal., 40, 173-177.
16. Coffey, A. (1987) AID issues. Adoptions and birth technology: new names, old issues. Mental Health News, July 6-8.
17. Cooke, S. (1993) Counselling in donor insemination. In Barratt, C.L.R. and Cooke, I. (eds), Donor Insemination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 12-32.
18. Council of Europe (1989) Human Artificial Procreation. Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
19. Curie-Cohen, M. (1980) The frequency of consanguineous mating due to multiple use of donors in artificial insemination. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 32, 589-560.
20. Daniels, K. (1988) Artificial insemination using donor semen and issue of secrecy: the views of donors and recipient couples. Soc. Sci. Med., 27, 377-383.
21. Daniels, K.R. and Lalos, O. (1995) The Swedish insemination act and the availability of donors. Hum. Reprod., 10, 1871-1874.
22. David, G., Czyglik, F., Mayaux, M.J. and Schwartz, D. (1980) The success of AID and semen characteristics: study on 1489 cycles and, 192 ejaculates. Int. J. Androl., 3, 613-619
23. Emperaire, J.C., Gauzere-Soumireu, E. and Audebert, A. (1982) Female fertility and donor insemination. Fertil. Steril., 37, 90-93.
24. Fédération CECOS/Auger, J. and Jouannet, P. (1997) Evidence for regional differences of semen quality among fertile French men. Hum. Reprod., 12, 740-745.
25. Fédération CECOS/Le Lannou, D. and Lansac, J. (1989) Artificial procreation with frozen donor semen, experience of the French Fédération CECOS. Hum. Reprod., 4, 757-761.
26. Fédération CECOS/Le Lannou, D. and Lansac, J. (1993) Artificial insemination with frozen donor semen: the French experience of CECOS. In Barratt, C.L. and Cooke, I.D. (eds), Donor Insemination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 152-169.
27. Fédération CECOS/Thépot, F., Mayaux, M.J., Czyglick, F. et al. (1996) Incidence of birth defects after artificial insemination with frozen donor semen: a collaborative study of the French CECOS Fédération on 11535 pregnancies. Hum. Reprod., 11, 2319-2323.
28. Foresta, C., Rossato, M., Garolla, A. and Ferlin (1996) Male infertility and ICSI: are there limits? Hum. Reprod., 11, 2347-2348.
29. Forse, R.A., Ackman, C.F.D. and Fraser, F.C. (1985) Possible teratogenic effects of artificial insemination by donor. Clin. Genet., 28, 23-26.
30. Frets, P.G. and Niermeijer, M.F. (1990) Reproductive planning after genetic counseling: a perspective from the last decade. Clin. Genet., 38, 295-306.
31. Golombok, S. and Cook, R. (1994) A survey of semen donation: phase I - the view of UK licensed centre. Hum. Reprod., 9, 882-888.
32. Greiss, M.A., Terry, P. and Urbaniak, S.J. (1995) Artificial insemination in RhD negative women. [Lett.] Fertil. Steril., 10, 2176.
33. Human Fertilisation Embryology Authority (1992) Code of Practice. HFEA, London.
34. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (1993) Code of Practice. HFEA, London
35. Human Fertilisation Embryology Authority (1994) Third Annual Report. HFEA, London.
36. Jacquard, A. and Schoaevaert, D. (1979) Artificial insemination and consanguinity. In David, G. and Price, W. (eds), Human Artificial Insemination and Semen Preservation. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 385-387.
37. Jalbert, P., Leonard, C., Selva J. and David, G. (1989) Genetic aspects of artificial insemination with donor semen: the French CECOS Federation guidelines. Am. J. Med. Genet., 33, 269-275.
38. Klock, S. (1993) The psychological aspects of donor insemination. Infertil. Reprod. Clin. N. Am., 4, 455-469.
39. Klock, S. and Maier, D. (1991)Psychological factors related to donor insemination. Fertil. Steril., 56, 489-495.
40. Klock, S., Jacob, M.C and Maier, D. (1994) A prospective study of donor insemination recipients: secrecy, privacy and disclosure. Fertil. Steril., 62, 477-483.
41. Kremer, J., Frijling, B.W. and Nass, J.L. (1984) Psychological aspects of parenthood by artificial insemination donor. Lancet, i, 628.
42. Lansac, J. and Le Lannou, D. (1994) Sperm donation and Practice of AID in France. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet., 11, 231-236.
43. Le Lannou, D., Laroche, M., Omnie-Bie, N. et al. (1989) Intéréts des inséminations intrautérines dans un programme d'IAD. Contracept. Fertil. Sex., 17, 665-666.
44. Le Lannou, D, Gastard, E., Guivarch, A. et al. (1995) Strategies in frozen donor procreation. Hum. Reprod., 10, 1765-1774.
45. Levy, R., Keppi, B., Najioullah, F. et al. (1996) Cytomegalovirus et procreation médicalement assistée. Société d'Andrologie de langue Française, Nancy 12-14 Décembre. [Abstr. A23]
46. Manuel, C., Chevret, M. and Czyba, J.C. (1980) Handling of secrecy by AID couples. In David, G. and Price, W. (eds), Human Artificial Insemination and Semen Preservation. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 419-429.
47. Novaes, S.B. (1989) Gamete donors and donor policies in Reproductive. Med. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care, 5, 639-657.
48. Osborn, J.C., Yates, A. and Kovacs, G.T. (1993) Donor spermatozoa and its use in assisted reproduction (IVF, GIFT). In Barratt, C.L. and Cooke, I.D. (eds), Donor Insemination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 111-125
49. Robinson, J., Forman, R., Clark, A. et al. (1991) Attitudes of donors and recipients to gamete donation. Hum. Reprod., 6, 307-309.
50. Rowland, R. (1985) The social and psychological consequences of secrecy in artificial insemination by donor programmes. Soc. Sci. Med., 21, 391-396.
51. Schover, L.R., Collins, R.L. and Richards, S. (1992) Psychological aspects of donor insemination: evaluation and follow-up of recipient couples. Fertil. Steril., 57, 583-590.
52. Schover, L.R., Thomas, A.J., Miller, K.F. et al. (1996) Preferences for intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus donor insemination in severe male factor infertility: a preliminary report. Hum. Reprod., 11, 2461-2464.
53. Schwartz, D. and Mayaux, M.L (1982) Female fecundity as a function of age: results of artificial insemination in 2193 nulliparous women with azoospermic husbands. N. Engl. J. Med., 306, 404-405.
54. Selva, J., Leonard, C., Albert, M. et al. (1986) Genetic screening for artificial insemination by donor (AID) results of a study on 676 donors. Clin. Genet., 29, 389-396.
55. Serre, J.L. (1995) L'IAD en danger. La Recherche, 280, 10-11.
56. Snowden, R. (1985) The social implications of artificial reproduction. In Thomson, W., Joyce, D.N. and Newton, J.R. (eds), In Vitro Fertilization and Donor Insemination. Proceedings of the 12th Study Group of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. RCOG, London.
57. Sverne, T. (1990) Bio-Technological Developments and the Law. Changing Family Paterns. Basil Blackwell Ltd/UNESCO, no. 126, pp. 465-472.
58. The Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society (1988) Guidelines for Therapeutic Donor Insemination. Montreal, Canada.
59. Thépot, F., Mayaux, M.J. et al. (1996) Incidence of birth defects after artificial insemination with frozen donor spermatozoa: a collaborative study of the French CECOS Federation on 11535 pregnancies. Hum. Reprod., 10, 2319-2323.
60. Timmons, M.C., Rao, K.W., Sloan, C.S. et al. (1981) Genetic screening of donors for artificial insemination. Fertil. Steril., 35, 451-456.
61. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessement (1988) Artificial insemination, practice in the United States: Summary of a 1987 survey. Background paper. OTA BP BA 48, Washington DC, USA.
62. Vogel, F. and Motulsky, A.G. (eds) (1986) In Human Genetics. Approach and Problems. Springer-Verlag, pp. 493 and 499.