Modified ureterosigmoidostomy (Mainz Pouch II) in different age groups and with different techniques of ureteric implantation

BJU International

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 345-349

  Bastian, Patrick J ^a,b   Albers, Peter ^a   Haferkamp, Axel ^a   Schumacher, Stefan ^a   Müller, Stefan C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BONN   (Germany)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cystectomy; Mainz Pouch II; Ureteric implantation; Ureterosigmoidostomy; Urinary continence; Urinary diversion

Indexed keywords

BICARBONATE;

ABEL ENEIN; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER CARCINOMA; BLADDER EXSTROPHY; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPISPADIAS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GOODWIN HOHENFELLNER; GYNECOLOGIC CANCER; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LE DUC; MAINZ POUCH 2; MALE; METABOLIC ACIDOSIS; NOCTURIA; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELONEPHRITIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URETER DILATATION; URETER OBSTRUCTION; URETER REIMPLANTATION; URETEROSIGMOIDOSTOMY; URINARY DIVERSION; URINE INCONTINENCE; WOUND HEALING IMPAIRMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COLON, SIGMOID; CYSTECTOMY; DILATATION, PATHOLOGIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK FACTORS; URETER; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; URETEROSTOMY; URINARY BLADDER DISEASES; URINARY DIVERSION; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URINARY RESERVOIRS, CONTINENT;

EID: 4344641437     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04963.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Simon J. Ectopia vesicae (absence of the anterior walls of the bladder and pubis abdominal parietes); operation for directing the orifices of the uterus into the rectum; temporary success; subsequent death; autopsy. Lancet 1852; 2: 568-70
2. Hinman F, Weyrauch HM Jr. A critical study of the different principles of surgery which have been used in uretero-intestinal implantation. Trans Am Assoc Genito-Urin Surg 1936; 29: 15-6
3. Stamey TA. The pathogenesis and implications of the electrolyte imbalance in uereterosigmoidostomy. Surg Gynec Obst 1956; 103: 736-58
4. Fisch M, Wammack R, Müller SC, Hohenfellner R. The Mainz pouch II (sigma rectum pouch). J Urol 1993; 149: 258-63
5. Woodhouse CRJ, Christofides M. Modified ureterosigmoidostomy (Mainz II) - technique and early results. Br J Urol 1998; 81: 247-52
6. Gerharz EW, Köhl UN, Weingärtner K, Kleinhans BJ, Melekos MD, Riedmiller H. Experience with the Mainz modification of ureterosigmoidostomy. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 1512-6
7. Le Due A, Camey A, Teillac P. An original antireflux uretero-ileal implantation technique: long term follow-up. J Urol 1987; 137: 1156-8
8. Fisch M, Hohenfellner R. Der Sigma-Rektum Pouch: Eine Modifikation der Harnableitung. Akt Urol 1991; 22: I-IX
9. Fisch M, Wammack R, Müller SC, Hohenfellner R. Mainz Pouch II. Eur Urol 1994; 25: 7-15
10. Gilja I, Kovacic M, Radej M, Kosuta D, Bakula B, Goles L. The sigmoidorectal pouch (Mainz Pouch II). Eur Urol 1996; 29: 210-6
11. Venn SN, Mundy AR. Continent urinary diversion using the Mainz-type ureterosigmoidostomy - a valuable salvage procedure. Eur Urol 1999; 36: 247-51
12. Öbek C, Kural AR, Ataus S et al. Complications of the Mainz Pouch II (sigma rectum pouch). Eur Urol 2001; 39: 204-11
13. Kälble T, Tricker AR, Fried I P et al. Ureterosigmoidostomy. Long-term results, risk of carcinoma and etiological factors for carcinogenesis. J Urol 1990; 144: 1110-4
14. Goodwin WE, Harris AP, Kaufmann JJ, Beal JM. Open transcolonic ureterointestinal anastomosis: a new approach. Surg Gynec Obst 1953; 97: 295-300
15. Hohenfellner R, Planz C, Wulff HD et al. Die transsigmoidale Ureterosigmoidostomie (Sigma-Rectum-Blase). Operationstechnik and Gesamtkaliumbestimmung. Urologe 1967; 6: 275-81
16. Abol-Enein H, Ghoneim MA. A novel ureteo-ileal reimplantation technique: the serous lined extramural tunnel. A preliminary report. J Urol 1994; 151: 1193-7
17. El Mekresch MM, Hafez AT, Abol-Enein H, Ghoneim MA. Double folded rectosigmoid bladder with new ureterocolic antireflux technique. J Urol 1997; 157: 2085-9
18. Abol-Enein H, Ghoneim MA. Optimization of uretero-intestinal anastomosis in urinary diversion: an experimental study in dogs. II. A new antireflux technique for uretero-ileal anastomosis: a serous-lined extramural tunnel. Urol Res 1993; 21: 135-9
19. Chang SS, Cookson MS, Baumgartner RG, Wells N, Smith JA. Analysis of early complications after radical cystectomy: results of a collaborative care pathway. J Urol 2002; 167: 2012-6
20. Soulie M, Straub M, Game X et al. A multicenter study of morbidity of radical cystectomy in select elderly patients with bladder cancer. J Urol 2002; 167: 1325-8
21. Poulakis V, Witzsch, de Vries R, Becht E. Antegrade percutaneous endoluminal treatment of non-malignant ureterointestinal anastomotic strictures following urinary diversion. Eur Urol 2001; 39: 308-15
22. Kabalin JN. Acucise incision of ureteroenteric stricuters. Efficacy of Acucise endoureterotomy. J Endourol 1997; 11: 37-40
23. Pajor L, Kelemen Z. Our experience with the Mainz Pouch II. 40 patients; follow-up and complications. Ann Urol 1995; 29: 246-49
24. Ishigooka M, Hashimoto T, Izumiya K, Sasagawa I, Nakada T. Incidence of anal incontinence after long-term follow-up of patients treated with ureterosigmoidostomy. Int Urol Nephrol 1993; 25: 455-60
25. Krogh P, Christiansen J. A study of the physiological variation in anal manometry. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 69-71
26. Devroede G, Vobecky S, Mase A. Ischaemic fecal incontinence and rectal angina. Gastroenterology 1982; 83: 970-80
27. Pannek J, Haupt G, Senge T. Der Sigma-Rektum-Pouch (Mainz-Pouch II) bei fortgeschrittenem Urothelkarzinom. Aktuel Urol 1995; 26: 200-3
28. Gilja I, Kovacic M, Mazuran B, Deban R. Sigma-Rektum-Pouch: klinische, rektodynamische und radiologische Untersuchung. Aktuel Urol 2000; 31: 169-73
29. Satoh S, Sato K, Habuchi T, Matsuo S, Sasaki S, Kato T. Health related quality of life of ilealcecal rectal bladder compared with ileal conduit diversion: a questionnaire survey. Int J Urol 2002; 9: 385-91