Modified ureterosigmoidostomy (Mainz II) - Technique and early results

British Journal of Urology

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 247-252

  Woodhoiise, C R J ^a,c   Christofides, M ^a,b  

^a ROYAL MARSDEN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NICOSIA GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Cyprus)

^c 3rd Floor Research Laboratories   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Mainz II; Ureterosigmoidostomy; Urinary diversion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CYSTECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILEUM; INCIDENCE; MALE; PLASTIC SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELONEPHRITIS; RECTUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TECHNIQUE; URETEROSIGMOIDOSTOMY; URETHRA; URINARY DIVERSION; VESICOURETERAL REFLUX;

AGED; COLON, SIGMOID; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; URETER; URINARY DIVERSION; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 0031845338     PISSN: 00071331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.1998.00534.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Simon J. Ectopia vescicae (absence of the anterior walls of the bladder and pubic abdominal parietes): Operation for directing the orifices of the ureters into the rectum: temporary success: subsequent death: autopsy. Lancet 1852: 2: 568-70
2. Coffey RC. Physiologic implantation of the severed ureter or common bile duct into the intestine. / Am Med Assoc 1911; 56: 397-403
3. Bricker EM. Bladder substitution after pelvic evisceration. Surg Clin N Am 1950: 30: 1511-21
4. Fisch M. Wammack R, Muller SC. Hohenfellner R. The Mainz pouch 2 (sigma rectum pouch). / Urol 1993: 149: 258-63
5. Kock NG, Berglund B. Gonheim MA et al. Urinary diversion to the augmented and valved rectum. Scand / Urol Nephrol 1988: 22: 227-33
6. Wagstaff KE, Woodhouse CRJ. Rose GA, Duffy PG, Ransley PG. Blood and urine analysis in patients with intestinal bladders. Br J Urol 1991: 68: 311-6
7. Silverman SH, Woodhouse CRJ. Strachan JR. Gumming J. Keighley MRB. Long term management of patients who have had urinary diversions into colon. Br J Urol 1986: 58: 634-9
8. Strachan JR. Woodhouse CRJ. Malignancy in exstrophy patients following ureterosigmoidostomy. Br / Surg 1991: 78: 1216-8
9. Jacobs A, Barr Stirling W. The late results of ureterocolic anastomosis. Br J Urol 1952: 24: 259-316
10. McConnell JB, Stewart WK. The long-term management and social consequences of ureterosigmoid anastomosis. Br J Urol 1975: 47: 607-12
11. Stewart M. Urinary diversion and bowel cancer. Ami Ron Coll Surg Engl 1986: 68: 98-102
12. Nurse DE. Mundy AR. Assessment of the malignant potential of cystoplasty. Br J Urol 1989: 64: 489-92
13. Filmer RB. Bruce JR. Malignancies in bladder augmentations and intestinal conduits. / Urol 1990: 143: 671-8
14. Ghoneim M, Ashamallah AK, Mahran MA. Kock NG. Further experience with the modified rectal bladder (the augmented and valved rectum). / Urol 1992; 147: 1252-5
15. Wammack R. Fisch M. Hohenfellner R. Ureterosigmoidostomy and the Mainz pouch II. In Webster GD. Goldwasser B eds. Urinary Diversion. Scientific Foundations and Clinical Practice. Oxford: Isis Medical Media. 1995: 253-69
16. El-Damanhoury H. Miligi A. El-Helali A. Khalaf I. Mainz pouch II for continent urinary diversion after cystectomy. / Urol 1996: 155: 520A
17. Atta AA. Detubularised isolated ureterosigmoidostomy: description of a new technique and preliminary results. / Urol 1996; 156: 915-9
18. Dawaba MS. Dawood A. Ghoneim MA. The modified rectal bladder in children: long term follow-up. World J Urol 1996: 14: 73-7
19. Gilija I. Kovacic M, Radej M et al. The sigmoidorectal pouch (Mainz Pouch II). Eur Urol 1996: 29: 210-5