Ammonoid taxonomic and morphologic recovery patterns after the Permian-Triassic

Geology

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 665-668

  McGowan, Alistair J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Ammonoids; Biotic recovery; Morphologic evolution; Permian; Triassic

Indexed keywords

TAXONOMIC DIVERSITY; TAXONOMIC MATRICES; AMMONOIDS; MORPHOLOGIC EVOLUTION; NATURAL EXPERIMENT; PERMIAN; PERMIAN-TRIASSIC MASS EXTINCTIONS; TAXONOMIC METRICS; TRIASSIC;

GEOLOGY; SOCIAL ASPECTS; BIODIVERSITY; RECOVERY;

BIODIVERSITY; GEOLOGY;

AMMONITE; BIODIVERSITY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; MASS EXTINCTION; PERMIAN-TRIASSIC BOUNDARY; SURVIVAL; TAXONOMY; CONVERGENT EVOLUTION; MORPHOLOGY; PERMIAN; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TRIASSIC;

EID: 4344634498     PISSN: 00917613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1130/G20462.1     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alroy, J., 1996, Constant extinction, constrained diversification, and uncoordinated stasis in North American mammals: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 127, p. 285-311.
2. Alroy, J., Marshall, C.R., Bambach, R.K., Bezusko, K., Foote, M., Fursich, F.T., Hansen, T.A., Holland, S.M., Ivany, L.C., Jablonski, D., Jacobs, D.K., Jones, D.C., Kosnik, M.A., Lidgard, S., Low, S., Miller, A.I., Novack-Gottshall, P.M., Olszewski, T.D., Patzkowsky, M.E., Raup, D.M., Roy, K., Sepkoski, J.J., Jr., Sommers, M.G., Wagner, P.J., and Webber, A., 2001, Effect of sampling standardization on estimates of Phanerozoic marine diversification: National Academy of Sciences of America Proceedings, v. 98, p. 6261-6266.
3. Dommergues, J.-L., Laurin, B., and Meister, C., 1996, Evolution of ammonoid morphospace during the Early Jurassic radiation: Paleobiology, v. 22, p. 219-240.
4. Erwin, D.H., 1996, Understanding biotic recoveries, in Jablonski, D., et al., eds., Evolutionary paleobiology: Chicago, University of Chicago Press, p. 398-418.
5. Erwin, D.H., 2001, Lessons from the past: Biotic recoveries from mass extinctions: National Academy of Sciences Proceedings, v. 98, p. 5399-5403.
6. Foote, M., 1993, Discordance and concordance between morphological and taxonomic diversity: Paleobiology, v. 19, p. 185-204.
7. Foote, M., 1996, Ecological controls on the evolutionary recovery of post-Paleozoic crinoids: Science, v. 274, p. 1492-1495.
8. Jablonski, D., 2002, Survival without recovery after mass extinctions: National Academy of Sciences Proceedings, v. 99, p. 8139-8144.
9. Leonova, T.B., 2002, Permian ammonoids: Classification and phylogeny: Paleontological Journal, v. 36, supplement 1, p. S1-S114.
10. McGowan, A.J., 2003, Macroevolutionary patterns of Triassic ammonoid morphology: Relationships among disparity, morphotypes, and spatiotemporal evolutionary patterns [Ph.D. thesis]: Chicago, Illinois, University of Chicago, 371 p.
11. McGowan, A.J., 2004, The effect of the Permo-Triassic bottleneck on Triassic ammonoid morphological evolution: Paleobiology, v. 30 (in press).
12. Miller, A.I., and Foote, M., 1996, Calibrating the Ordovician radiation of marine life: Implications for Phanerozoic diversity trends: Paleobiology, v. 22, p. 304-309.
13. Page, K.N., 1996, Mesozoic ammonoids in space and time, in Landman, N.H., et al., eds., Ammonoid paleobiology: New York, Plenum, p. 755-794.
14. Roy, K., and Foote, M., 1997, Morphological approaches to measuring biodiversity: Trends in Ecology and Evolution, v. 12, p. 277-281.
15. Saunders, W.B., and Swan, A.R.H., 1984, Morphology and morphologic diversity of mid-Carboniferous (Namurian) ammonoids in time and space: Paleobiology, v. 10, p. 195-228.
16. Schubert, D., and Bonjer, D.J., 1995, Aftermath of the Permo-Triassic mass extinction event: Paleoecology of Lower Triassic carbonates in the Western USA: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 116, p. 1-39.
17. Sepkoski, J.J., Jr., 1993, Ten years in the library: New data confirm paleontological patterns: Paleobiology, v. 19, p. 246-257.
18. Sepkoski, J.J., Jr., 1997, Biodiversity, past, present, and future: Journal of Paleontology, v. 71, p. 533-539.
19. Sole, R.V., Montoya, J.M., and Erwin, D.H., 2002, Recovery after mass extinction: Evolutionary assembly in large-scale biosphere dynamics: Royal Society [London] Philosophical Transactions, ser. B, v. 357, p. 697-707.
20. Streelman, J.T., and Danley, P.D., 2003, The stages of vertebrate evolutionary radiation: Trends in Ecology and Evolution, v. 18, p. 126-131.
21. Swan, A.R.H., and Saunders, W.B., 1987, Function and shape in late Paleozoic (mid-Carboniferous) ammonoids: Paleobiology, v. 13, p. 297-311.
22. Tozer, E.T., 1981, Triassic Ammonoidea: Classification, evolution and relationship with Permian and Jurassic forms, in House, M.R., and Senior, J.R., eds., The Ammonoidea: Systematics Association Special Volume 18: London, Academic Press, p. 66-100.
23. Tozer, E.T., 1994, Canadian Triassic ammonoid faunas: Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, v. 467, 663 p.
24. Van Valen, L., 1974, Multivariate statistics in natural history: Journal of Theoretical Biology, v. 45, p. 235-247.
25. Wills, M.A., 1998, Crustacean disparity through the Phanerozoic: Comparing morphological and stratigraphic data: Linnean Society Biological Journal, v. 65, p. 455-500.
26. Woods, A.D., and Bottjer, D.J., 2000, Distribution of ammonoids in the Lower Triassic Union Wash Formation (eastern California): Evidence for paleoceanographic conditions during recovery from the end-Permian mass extinction: Palaios, v. 15, p. 535-545.
27. Woods, A.D., Bottjer, D.J., and Mutti, J., 1999, Lower Triassic large sea-floor carbonate cements: Their origin and a mechanism for prolonged biotic recovery from the end-Permian mass extinction: Geology, v. 27, p. 63-67.