Bouncing or streaming? Exploring the influence of auditory cues on the interpretation of ambiguous visual motion

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 157, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 537-541

  Sanabria, Daniel ^a   Correa, Ángel ^a,b   Lupiáñez, Juan ^a,b   Spence, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Crossmodal integration; Motion perception; Multisensory perception; Neural substrates of audiovisual integration

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 4344622164     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1993-z     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bertelson P, de Gelder B (2004) The psychology of multimodal perception. In: C Spence, J Driver (eds) Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 141-177
2. Bertenthal B, Banton T, Bradbury A (1993) Directional bias in the perception of translating patterns. Perception 22:193-207
3. Bushara KO, Hanakawa T, Immisch I, Toma K, Kansaku K, Hallett M (2002) Neural correlates of cross-modal binding. Nat Neurosci 6:190-195
4. Calvert G, Spence C, Stein BE (eds) (2004) The handbook of multisensory processes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
5. Driver J, Spence C (2000) Multisensory perception: beyond modularity and convergence. Curr Biol 10:731-735
6. Michotte A (1963) The perception of causality. In: Miles T, Miles E (trans) Basic Books, New York (Original work published 1946)
7. Orne MT (1962) On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. Am Psychol 17:776-783
8. Pashler HE (1998) The psychology of attention. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
9. Rosenthal R (1967) Covert communication in the psychological experiment. Psychol Bull 67:356-367
10. Scheier C, Lewkowicz DJ, Shimojo S (2003) Sound induces perceptual reorganization of an ambiguous motion display in human infants. Developmental Science 6:233-244
11. Schneider W (1988) Micro experimental laboratory: an integrated System for IBM PC compatibles. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 20:206-271
12. Scholl B, Nakayama K (2002) Causal capture: contextual effects on the perception of collision events. Psychol Sci 13:493-498
13. Sekuler AB, Sekuler R (1999) Collisions between moving visual targets: What controls alternative ways of seeing an ambiguous display? Perception 28:415-432
14. Sekuler R, Sekuler AB, Lau R (1997) Sound alters visual motion perception. Nature 385:308
15. Spence C, Driver J (1997) Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting. Percept Psychophys 59:1-22
16. Vroomen J, de Gelder B (2000) Sound enhances visual perception: Cross-modal effects of auditory organization on vision. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:1583-1590
17. Watanabe K, Shimojo S (1998) Attentional modulation in perception of visual motion events. Perception 27:1041-1054
18. Watanabe K, Shimojo S (2001a) Postcoincidence trajectory duration affects motion event perception. Percept Psychophys 63:16-28
19. Watanabe K, Shimojo S (2001b) When sound affects vision: effects of auditory grouping on visual motion perception. Psychol Sci 12:109-116
20. Wohlschläger A (2000) Visual motion priming by invisible actions. Vis Res 40:925-930