On the determination of joint reactions in multibody mechanisms

Journal of Mechanical Design

Volumn 126, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 341-350

  Blajer, Wojciech ^a  

^a KAZIMIERZ PULASKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND HUMANITIES IN RADOM   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); DYNAMICS; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; MATRIX ALGEBRA; ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS;

DIFFERENTIAL ALGEBRAIC EQUATION; JACOBIAN MATRIX; JOINT REACTIONS; MULTIBODY MECHANISMS; PSEUDOINVERSE MATRIX;

MACHINE DESIGN;

EID: 4344592909     PISSN: 10500472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.1667944     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kane, T. R., and Levinson, D. A., 1985, Dynamics: Theory and Applications, McGraw-Hill, New York.
2. Nikravesh, P. E., 1988, Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
3. García de Jalón, J., and Bayo, E., 1994, Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems: the Real-Time Challenge, Springer, New York.
4. Schiehlen, W., 1997, "Multibody System Dynamics: Roots and Perspectives," Multibody Syst. Dyn., 1(2), pp. 149-188.
5. Nikravesh, P. E., 1990, "Systematic Reduction of Multibody Equations of Motion to a Minimal Set," Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 25(2/3), pp. 143-151.
6. Langer, F. D., Hemami, H., and Brown, D. B., 1987, "Constraint Forces in Holonomic Mechanical Systems," Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 62, pp. 255-274.
7. Blajer, W., 1977, "A Geometric Unification of Constrained System Dynamics," Multibody Syst. Dyn., 1(1), pp. 3-21.
8. Blajer, W., 2001, "A Geometrical Interpretation and Uniform Matrix Formulation of Multibody System Dynamics," ZAMM, 81(4), pp. 247-259.
9. Eich-Soellner, E., and Führer, C., 1998, Numerical Methods in Multibody Dynamics, Teubner. Stuttgart.
10. Ascher, U. M., and Petzold, L. R., 1998, Computer Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations and Differential-Algebraic Equations, SIAM, Philadelphia.
11. Wehage, R. A., and Haug, E. J., 1982, "Generalized Coordinate Partitioning for Dimension Reduction in Analysis of Constrained Dynamic Systems," ASME J. Mech. Des., 104(1), pp. 247-255.
12. Wampler, C., Buffinton, K., and Shu-hui, J., 1985, "Formulation of Equations of Motion for Systems Subject to Constraints," ASME J. Appl. Mech., 52(2), pp. 465-470.
13. Blajer, W., Schiehlen, W., and Schirm, W., 1994, "A Projective Criterion to the Coordinate Partitioning Method for Multibody Dynamics," Arch. Appl. Mech., 64(2), pp. 86-98.
14. Lesser, M., 1992, "A Geometrical Interpretation of Kane's Equations," Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, A436, pp. 69-87.
15. Djerassi, S., 1997, "Determination of Noncontributing Forces and Noncontributing Impulses in Three-Phase Motions," ASME J. Appl. Mech., 64(3), pp. 582-589.
16. Yamaguchi, G. T., 2001, Dynamic Modeling of Musculoskeletal Motion: A Vectorized Approach for Biomechanical Analysis in Three Dimensions, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
17. Campbell, S. L., and Meyer, C. D., Jr., 1979, Generalized Inverses of Linear Transformations, Pitman, London.
18. Blajer, W., 2002, "Elimination of Constraint Violation and Accuracy Aspects in Numerical Simulation of Multibody Systems," Multibody Syst. Dyn., 7(3), pp. 265-284.
19. Udwadia, F. E., and Kalaba, R. E., 1996, Analytical Dynamics: A New Approach, Cambridge University Press, New York.
20. Singh, R. P., and Likins, P. W., 1985, "Singular Value Decomposition for Constrained Dynamical Systems," ASME J. Appl.