Interedge strong-to-weak scattering evolution at a constriction in the fractional quantum hall regime

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 93, Issue 4, 2004, Pages

  Roddaro, Stefane ^a   Pellegrini, Vittorio ^a   Beltram, Fabio ^a   Biasiol, Giorgio ^b   Sorba, Lucia ^b,c  

^a SCUOLA NORMALE SUPERIORE   (Italy)

^b LABORATORIO TASC   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACKSCATTERING; DATA REDUCTION; ELECTRIC BREAKDOWN; ELECTRIC EXCITATION; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRON TUNNELING; ELECTROSTATICS; FERMI LIQUIDS; FERMIONS; HALL EFFECT; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

CHIRAL LUTTINGER LIQUID (CLL); INTEREDGE TUNNELING; LANDAUER-BUTTIKER CURRENT; QUANTUM HALL (QH) STATES; QUANTUM POINT CONTACT (QPC);

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 4344591486     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.046801     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. A. M. Chang, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 1449 (2003).
2. Perspectives in Quantum Hall Effect, edited by S. Das Sarma and A. Pinczuk (Wiley, New York, 1996).
3. X. G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 44, 5708 (1991).
4. X. G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 43, 11025 (1991).
5. X. G. Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2206 (1990).
6. C. L. Kane and M. P. A. Fisher, in Perspectives in Quantum Hall Effect (Ref. [2], pp. 109-159).
7. P. Fendley et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2196 (1995).
8. P. Fendley et al., Phys. Rev. B 52, 8934 (1995).
9. P. Fendley and H. Saleur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2518 (1998).
10. R. D'Agosta et al., Phys. Rev. B 68, 035314 (2003).
11. A. Koutouza et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 026801 (2003).
12. S. S. Mandai and J. K. Jain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 096801 (2002).
13. M. Grayson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2645 (2001).
14. I. Yang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 92, 056802 (2004).
15. F. P. Milliken, C. P. Umbach, and R. A. Webb, Solid State Commun. 97, 309 (1995).
16. I. J. Maasilta and V.J. Goldman, Phys. Rev. B 55, 4081 (1997).
17. L. Saminadayar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2526 (1997).
18. S. Roddaro et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 90, 046805 (2003).
19. S. Roddaro et al., Physica E (Amsterdam) 22, 185 (2004).
20. R. de Picciotto et al., Nature (London) 389, 162 (1997).
21. Y. Chung et al., Phys. Rev. B 67, 201104 (2003).
22. Y. Chung et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 216804 (2003).
23. E. Papa and A. H. MacDonald (to be published).
24. S. S. Mandai and J. K. Jain, Solid State Commun. 118, 503 (2001).
25. N. P. Sandler et al., Phys. Rev. B 57, 12324 (1998).
26. 2 ≈ 77.4 kΩ can be explained as due to partial reflection of the edge tunneling current at the ground contact 2. This effect is stronger in the high reflection limit reached at the lowest temperatures [top of Fig. 2(a)].
27. ac ≈ 10 mK, well below our lowest accessible temperature.
28. B. Rosenow, and B.I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 096404 (2002).
29. 2/'v*.