How universal is the fractional-quantum-Hall edge Luttinger liquid?

Solid State Communications

Volumn 118, Issue 10, 2001, Pages 503-507

  Mandal, Sudhansu S ^a   Jain, J K ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

D. Composite fermions; D. Edge states; D. Fractional quantum Hall effect; D. Luttinger liquid

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; FERMI LIQUIDS; FERMIONS; GREEN'S FUNCTION; HALL EFFECT;

COMPOSITE FERMIONS; FRACTIONAL QUANTUM HALL EFFECTS; LUTTINGER LIQUIDS;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0035811230     PISSN: 00381098     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0038-1098(01)00156-9     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Tsui D.C., Stormer H.L., Gossard A.C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48:1982;1559.
2. Laughlin R.B. Phys. Rev. B. 23:1981;5632.
3. Halperin B.I. Phys. Rev. B. 25:1982;2185.
4. Grayson M., et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80:1998;1062.
5. Chang A.M., et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86:2001;143.
6. Wen X.G. Phys. Rev. B. 41:1990;12838.
7. Wen X.G. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B. 6:1992;1711.
8. Lee D.H., Wen X.G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66:1991;1765.
9. Mitra S., MacDonald A.H. Phys. Rev. B. 48:1993;2005.
10. Palacios J.J., MacDonald A.H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76:1996;118.
11. Moon K., Girvin S.M. Phys. Rev. B. 54:1996;4448.
12. Shytov A.V., Levitov L.S., Halperin B.I. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80:1998;141.
13. Z'ulicke U., MacDonald A.H. Phys. Rev. B. 60:1999;1837.
14. During the course of our work, V.J. Goldman and E. Tsiper (cond-mat/0101221) reported on a study estimating the exponent α for the Coulomb problem by a different method.
15. Laughlin R.B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50:1983;1395.
16. Jain J.K. Phys. Rev. Lett. 63:1989;199.
17. Dev G., Jain J.K. Phys. Rev. B. 45:1992;1223.
18. Jain J.K., Kawamura T. Europhys. Lett. 29:1995;321.
19. Cappelli A., Mendez C., Simonin J., Zemba G.R. Phys. Rev. B. 58:1998;16291.
20. Han J.H., Yang S.-R.Eric. Phys. Rev. B. 58:1998;R10163.
21. E. Tsiper and V.J. Goldman, cond-mat/0101151.
22. Haldane F.D.M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 51:1983;605.
23. We note that in the spherical geometry, the ground state does not mix with the single CF-exciton (involving excitations to arbitrary CF-LL) for symmetry reasons, because the CF excitons have non-zero orbital angular momenta. This indicates that the corrections to the FQHE wave function in the bulk involve mixing with higher order excitations, containing two or more CF-excitons, and hence are much weaker.
24. Jain J.K., Kamilla R.K. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B. 11:1997;2621.
25. Jain J.K., Kamilla R.K. Phys. Rev. B. 55:1997;R4895.
26. S.S. Mandal, J.K. Jain, Phys. Rev. B., in press (cond-mat/0103472).