Experiments in digital literacy

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 421-429

  Eshet Alkali, Yoram ^a,c   Amichai Hamburger, Yair ^b  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF ISRAEL   (Israel)

^b BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^c TEL HAI COLLEGE   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DEVICE; EMOTION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; READING; SOCIAL ADAPTATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; COGNITION; COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER LITERACY; CONCEPT FORMATION; CREATIVENESS; FEMALE; GUIDELINES; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; PROBLEM SOLVING; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 4344588776     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.421     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Lenham, R. (1995). Digital literacy. Scientific American 273:253-255.
2. Papert, S. (1996). The connected family. Atlanta: Longstreet Press.
3. Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York: Wiley Computer Publishing.
4. Inoue, H., Naito, E., & Koshizuka, M. (1997). Mediacy: What it is? Where to go? International Information & Library Review 29:403-113.
5. Pool, C.R. (1997). A new digital literacy: a conversation with Paul Gilster. Educational Leadership 55:6-11.
6. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: the rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Bruce, B., & Peyton, J.K. (1999). Literacy development in network-based classrooms: innovation and realizations. International Journal of Educational Technology [On-line]. Available: www.outreach.uiuc.edu/ijet/v1n2/ bruce/index.html.
8. Davies, J., Szabo, M., & Montgomerie, C. (2002). Assessing Information and communication technology literacy of education undergraduates: instrument development. In: Barker, P., Rebelsky, S. (eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA, 2001 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp. 377-383.
9. Swan, K., Bangert-Drowns, J.B., Moore-Cox, A., et al. (2002). Technology and literacy learning: a national survey of classrom use. In: Barker, P., Rebelsky, S. (eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA, 2001 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp. 221-223.
10. Burnett, K., & McKinley, E.G. (1998). Modeling information seeking. Interacting with Computers 10:285-302.
11. Wang, P., Hawk, W.B., & Tenopir, C. (2000). Users' interactions with World Wide Web resources: an exploratory study using a holistic approach. Information Processing and Management 36:229-251.
12. Zins, C. (2000). Success, a structured search strategy rationale, principles and implications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51:1232-1247.
13. Cothey, V. (2002). A longitudinal study of World Wide Web users' information-searching behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53:67-78.
14. Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: differences in people's online skills. First Monday 7 [On-line]. Available: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_4/hargittai/index.html.
15. Hargittai, E. (2002). Beyond logs and surveys: indepth measures of people's Web use skills. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53:1239-1244.
16. Marchionini, G. (1989). Information-seeking strategies of novices using a full-text electronic encyclopedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 40:54-66.
17. Eshet, Y. (2002). Digital literacy: a new terminology framework and its application to the design of meaningful technology-based learning environments. In: Barker, P., Rebelsky, S. (eds.), Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp. 493-498.
18. Springer, C.J. (1987). Review of information from complex alphanumeric displays: screen formatting variables' effects on target identification time. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.), Cognitive engineering in the design of human-computer interaction and expert systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 375-382.
19. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. San Diego: Morgan Kaufman.
20. Tuft, E.R. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire, CT: Graphic Press.
21. Mullet, K., & Sano, D. (1995). Designing visual interfaces. Engelwood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22. Schneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
23. Margono, S., & Shneiderman, B. (1987). A study of file manipulation by novices using direct command versus direct manipulation. Presented at the 26th Annual Technical Symposium, ACM, Washington, DC.
24. Opperman, R. (2002). User interface design. In: Adelsberger, H.H., Collis, B., Pawlowski, J.M. (eds.), Handbook on information technologies for education and training. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 233-248.
25. Benjamin W. (1994). The work of art in the age of technical reproduction [Hebrew translation from German]. Tel Aviv: Teamin Publishers.
26. Mason, J.M. (2002). From Gutenberg's galaxy to cyberspace: a new model for a new writing space. In: Barker, P., Rebelsky, S. (eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA, 2001 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp. 1230-1236.
27. Labbo, L.D., Reinking, D., & McKenna, M.C. (1998). Technology and literacy Education in the next century: exploring the connection between work and schooling. Peabody Journal of Education 73:273-289.
28. Schank, R.C. (1984). The cognitive computer: on language, learning and artificial intelligence. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
29. Jansen, B.J., & Pooch, U. (2001). A review of web searching studies and a framework for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52:235-246.
30. Spiro, R.J., Feltovitch, P.L., Jacobson, M.J., et al. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism and hypertext: random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology 31:24-33.
31. Rouet, J.F., & Levonen, J.J. (1996). Studying and learning with hypertext: empirical studies and their implications. In: Rouet, J.F., Levonen, J.J., Dillon, A., et al. (eds.), Hypertext and cognition. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 9-23.
32. Horton, W. (2000). Designing web-based training. New York: Wiley & Sons.
33. Piacciano, A. (2001). Distance learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merril, Prentice-Hall.
34. Daniels, J., Takach, B.S., & Varnhagen, C. (2002). Getting stuck in the world wide web: the impact of design on navigation. In: Barker, P., Rebelsky, S. (eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA, 2001 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp. 371-372.
35. Lazar, J., Bessiere, K., Ceaparu, I., et al. (2003). Help! I'm lost: user frustration in web navigation. IT & Society 1:18-26.
36. Lee, J.J., & Hsu, Y. (2002). Web navigation: the role of metaphor, concept map and individual differences. In: Barker, P., Rebelsky, S. (eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA, 2001 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp. 1000-1001.
37. Kerka, S. (1999). Consumer education for the information age. Practice Application Brief 4:12-15.
38. Salomon, G. (2000). Technology and education in the information age [in Hebrew]. Tel Aviv: Haifa University/Zemora-Bitan Publishers.
39. Dresang, E.T. (1999). More research needed: informal seeking-behavior of youth on the Internet. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50:1123-1124.
40. Morahan-Martin, J., & Anderson, C.D. (2000). Information and misinformation online: recommendations for facilitating accurate mental health information retrieval and evaluation. CyberPsychology & Behavior 3:731-746.
41. Minkel, W. (2000). No, it's not all true! Library Journal August:33-34.
42. O'Sullivan, M. (2000). Teaching Internet information literacy, a collaborative approach (Part III). Multimedia Schools 7:34-37.
43. Mardis, M.A. (2002). Mind the gap: an overview of perceptual barriers to K-12 information literacy. In: Barker, P., Rebelsky, S. (eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA, 2001 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp. 1221-1222.
44. Mioduser, D., & Nachmias, R. (2002). WWW in education. In: Adelsberger, H.H., Collis, B., Pawlowski, J.M. (eds). Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 23-44.
45. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Engaging students in a knowledge society. Educational Leadership 54:6-10.
46. Wallace, P (1999). The psychology of the Internet. Cambridge: University Press.
47. Hamburger, Y.A., & Ben-Artzi, E. (2000). The relationships between extraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior 16:441-449.
48. Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2002). Internet and personality. Computers in Human Behavior 18:1-10.
49. Mundrof, N., & Laird, K.R. (2002). Social and Psychological effects of information technologies and other interactive media. In: Bryant, J., Zillman, D. (eds.), Media effects: advances in theory and research, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 231-255.
50. Wiggins, G. (1992). Creating tests worth taking. Educational Leadership 49:26-31.
51. Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessing student performance: exploring the purpose and limits of testing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
52. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 2:85-105.
53. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Ben-Artzi, E. (2003). Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior 19:71-80.
54. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Fine, A., & Goldstein, A. (2004). The impact of Internet interactivity and need for closure on consumer preference. Computers in Human Behavior 20:103-117.
55. Aspillaga, M. (1996). Perceptual foundations in the design of visual displays. Computers in Human Behavior 12:587-600.
56. Beavis, C. (1999). English and computer games. Presented at the Biennial Conference of the International Federation for the Teaching of English, Warwick, UK.
57. Bordia, P., & Rosnow, R. (1998). Rumor rest stops on the information highway: transmission patterns in a computer-mediated rumor chain. Human Communication Research 25:163-179.
58. Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
59. McLoughlin, C., & Hutchinson, H. (2002). Language learning in different modes: does technology make a difference? In: Barker, P., Rebelsky, S. (eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA, 2001 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunication. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp. 1279-1280.
60. Norton, P., & Wiburg, K.M. (1998). Teaching with technology. New York: Harcourt Brace.
61. Salomon, G. (1996). Learning is wonderful: what computers really offer in education. In: Kerr, S. (ed.), Technology and future of education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 111-130.
62. Snyder, I. (1999). Renegotiating the visual and the verbal communication. Prospect 1:13-23.