Electronic conduction in shock-compressed water

Physics of Plasmas

Volumn 11, Issue 8, 2004, Pages

  Celliers, P M ^a   Collins, G W ^a   Hicks, D G ^a   Koenig, M ^b   Henry, E ^b,c   Benuzzi Mounaix, A ^b   Batani, D ^c   Bradley, D K ^a   Da Silva, L B ^a   Wallace, R J ^a   Moon, S J ^a   Eggert, J H ^a   Lee, K K M ^d   Benedetti, L R ^d   Jeanloz, R ^d   Masclet, I ^e   Dague, N ^e   Marchet, B ^e   Rabec, M ^h   Gloahec, Le ^e   Reverdin, Ch ^e   Pasley, J ^f   Willi, O ^f   Neely, D ^g   Danson, C ^g   more..

^a LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique   (France)

^c INFM   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e CEA DAM DIF   (France)

^f IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^g Harwell Science and Innovation Campus   (United Kingdom)

^h NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC CONDUCTION; ELECTRONIC MOBILITY; SHOCK VELOCITY; SHOCK-COMPRESSED WATER;

CARRIER CONCENTRATION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; ELECTRONS; EQUATIONS OF STATE; FERMI LEVEL; FUNCTIONS; HIGH PRESSURE EFFECTS; HYDROGEN BONDS; IONS; LASER PULSES; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SOLAR SYSTEM;

LIGHT REFLECTION;

EID: 4344582221     PISSN: 1070664X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1758944     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. W. B. Hubbard, Science 275, 1279 (1997).
2. W. J. Nellis et al., Science 240, 779 (1988).
3. N. F. Ness et al., Science 246, 1473 (1989).
4. F. Williams, S. Varma, and S. Hillenius, J. Chem. Phys. 64, 1549 (1976).
5. M. Benoit et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2934 (1996).
6. H. David and S. Hamann, Trans. Faraday Soc. 55, 72 (1959).
7. S. Hamann and M. Linton, Trans. Faraday Soc. 62, 2234 (1966).
8. A. C. Mitchell and W. J. Nellis, J. Chem. Phys. 76, 6273 (1982).
9. N. C. Holmes et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2433 (1985).
10. V. V. Yakushev et al., JETP 90, 617 (2000).
11. R. Chau et al., J. Chem. Phys. 114, 1361 (2001), temperatures listed here are incorrect, Fig. 3 uses correct values.
12. C. Cavazzoni et al., Science 283, (1999).
13. E. Schwegler et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 265501 (2001).
14. G. Thiell et al., Laser Part. Beams 6, 93 (1988).
15. T. R. Boehly et al., Opt. Commun. 133, 495 (1997).
16. I. N. Ross et al., IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-17, 1653 (1981).
17. J. M. Walsh and M. H. Rice, J. Chem. Phys. 26, 815 (1957).
18. L. V. Al'tshuler, A. A. Bakanova, and R. F. Trunin, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 3, 761 (1959).
19. L. P. Volkov et al., JETP Lett. 31, 513 (1980).
20. G. A. Lyzenga, T. J. Ahrens, W. J. Nellis, and A. C. Mitchell, J. Chem. Phys. 76, 6282 (1982).
21. M. A. Podurets et al., Sov. Phys. JETP 35, 375 (1972).
22. See National Technical Information Service Document No. DE94-011699. (J. D. Johnson, SESAME Tables, 1994). Copies may be ordered from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161. For the aluminum standard we used SESAME table 3719. The water table used here was SESAME table 7150.
23. F. H. Ree, J. Chem. Phys. 12, 6287 (1982).
24. T. H. Bett et al., Appl. Opt. 34, 4025 (1995).
25. S. N. Dixit et al., Opt. Lett. 19, 417 (1994).
26. L. Barker and R. Hollenbach, J. Appl. Phys. 43, 4669 (1972).
27. P. M. Celliers et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 1320 (1998).
28. To check this we tracked propagation of the shock across a gap formed by placing a quartz plate a known distance from the lower Al step. The gap distance found by integrating the VISAR signal between breakout and impact matched the known gap distance to within measurement accuracy (∼1%).
29. W. J. Nellis and A. C. Mitchell, J. Chem. Phys. 73, 6137 (1980).
30. S. Kormer, Sov. Phys. Usp. 11, 229 (1968).
31. C. Kittel and H. Kroemer, Thermal Physics, 2nd ed. (Freeman, San Francisco, 1980).
32. A. Ioffe and A. Regel, Prog. Semicond. 4, 237 (1969).
33. g∼2-3 eV and γ∼ 1 in the pressure range of 100-200 GPa.
34. P. M. Celliers et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5564 (2000).
35. D. Hicks et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 035502 (2003).