A mixed shelf formulation accounting for thickness strains and finite strain 3d material models

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 74, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 945-970

  Klinkel, Sven ^a   Gruttmann, Friedrich ^b   Wagner, Werner ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

^b DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

3d constitutive behavior; Quadrilateral shell element; Reissner Mindlin shell theory; Thickness strains; Three field variational formulation

Indexed keywords

BUCKLING; CONSTITUTIVE EQUATIONS; ELASTICITY; INTERPOLATION; STRAIN; STRESS CONCENTRATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

QUADRILATERAL SHELL ELEMENT; REISSNER-MINDLIN THEORY;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

BUCKLING; CONSTITUTIVE EQUATIONS; ELASTICITY; INTERPOLATION; STRAIN; STRESS CONCENTRATION; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 43349096667     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.2199     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Hughes TJR, Carnoy E. Nonlinear finite element shell formulation accounting for large membrane strains. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1983; 39:69-82.
2. de Borst R. The zero-normal-stress condition in plane-stress and shell elastoplasticity. Communications in Applied Numerical Methods 1991; 7:29-33.
3. Dvorkin E, Pantuso D, Repetto E. A formulation of the MITC4 shell element for finite strain elasto-plastic analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1995; 125:17-40.
4. Klinkel S, Govindjee S. Using finite strain 3d-material models in beam and shell elements. Engineering Computations 2002; 19:902-921.
5. Basar Y, Ding Y. Shear deformation models for large-strain shell analysis. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1997; 34:1687-1708.
6. Brank B, Korelc J, Ibrahimbegovic A. Nonlinear shell models with seven kinematic parameters. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2002; 194:2336-2362.
7. Sansour C. A theory and finite element formulation of shells at finite deformations involving thickness change: circumventing the use of a rotation tensor. Archive of Applied Mechanics 1995; 65:194-216.
8. Brank B. Nonlinear shell models with seven kinematic parameters. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2005; 194:2336-2362.
9. Büchter N, Ranim E, Roehl D. Three-dimensional extension of non-linear shell formulation based on the enhanced assumed strain concept. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1994; 37:2551-2568.
10. Betsch P, Gruttmann F, Stein E. A 4-node finite shell element for the implementation of general hyperelastic 3d-elasticity at finite strains. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1994; 37:2551-2568.
11. Bischoff M, Ramm E. On the physical significance of higher order kinematic and static variables in a three-dimensional shell formulation. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2000; 37:6933-6960.
12. Simo JC, Rifai MS. A class of mixed assumed strain methods and the method of incompatible modes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1990; 29:1595-1638.
13. Huettel C, Matzenmiller A. Consistent discretization. of thickness strains in thin shells including 3d-material models. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering 1999; 15:293-293.
14. Wagner W, Gruttmann F. A robust nonlinear mixed hybrid quadrilateral shell element. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2004; 64:635-666.
15. Green AE, Naghdi PM. On the derivation of shell theories by direct approach. Journal of Applied Mechanics 1974; 41:173-176.
16. Dvorkin E, Bathe KJ. A continuum mechanics based four node shell element for general nonlinear analysis. Engineering Computations 1984; 1:77-88.
17. Simo JC, Fox DD, Rifai MS. On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part ii: the linear theory; computational aspects. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1989; 73:53-92.
18. Pian TTH, Sumihara K. Rational approach for assumed stress finite elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1984; 20:1685-1695.
19. Kasper EP, Taylor RL. A mixed-enhanced strain method. Part ii: geometrically nonlinear problems, Computers and Structures 2000; 75:251-260.
20. Gruttmann F, Wagner W. A linear quadrilateral shell element with fast stiffness computation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2005; 194:4279-4300.
21. Cook RD, MaIkus DS, Plesha ME. Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis (3rd edn). Wiley: New York, 1989.
22. Gruttmann F, Wagner W. Structural analysis of composite laminates using a mixed hybrid shell element. Computational Mechanics 2006; 37:479-497.
23. Simo JC. On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part vii: shell intersections with 5/6-dof finite element formulations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1993; 108:319-339.
24. Taylor RL. Feap - Manual. http:\\www.ce.berkeley\~rlt\feap\manual.pdf.
25. Klinkel S, Gruttmann F, Wagner W. A robust non-linear solid shell element based on a mixed variational formulation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195:179-201.
26. MacNeal RH, Harder RL. A proposed standard set of problems to test finite element accuracy. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 1985; 1:3-20.
27. Fontes Valente RA, Parente MPL, Natal Jorge RM, Cesar de Sa JMA, Gracio JJ. Enhanced transverse shear strain shell formulation applied to elasto-plastic deformation problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2005; 62:1360-1398.
28. Chroscielewski J, Witkowski W. Four-node semi-EAS element in six-field nonlinear theory of shells. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2006; 68:1137-1179.
29. Eberlein R, Wriggers P. Finite element concepts for finite elastoplastic strains and isotropic stress response in shells: theoretical and computational analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1999; 171:243-279.
30. Parisch H. Efficient non-linear finite element shell formulation involving large strains. Engineering Computations 1986; 3:121-126.
31. Simo JC. Algorithms for static and dynamic multiplicative plasticity that preserve the classical return mapping schemes of the infinitesimal theory. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1992; 99:61-112.
32. Basar Y, Itskov M. Finite element formulation of the Ogden material model with application to rubber-like shells. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1998; 42:1279-1305.
33. Treloar L. Stress-strain data for vulcanised rubber under various types of deformation. Transactions of the Faraday Society 1944; 40:59-70.
34. Ogden R. Large deformation isotropic elasticity - on the correlation of theory and experiment for compressible rubberlike solids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A 1972; 328:567-583.
35. Miehe C, Stein E. A canonical model of multiplicative elasto-plasticity formulation and aspects of the numerical implementation. European Journal of Mechanics, A 1992; 11:25-43.
36. Klinkel S, Wagner W, Gruttmann F. A continuum based 3d-shell element for computation of laminated structures and finite strain plasticity problems. In Computational Techniques for Materials, Composites and Composite Structures, Topping BHV (ed.). Civil-Comp Press: Edinburgh, U.K., 2000; 297-310.