Enhanced transverse shear strain shell formulation applied to large elasto-plastic deformation problems

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 62, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1360-1398

  Fontes Valente, R A ^a,b   Parente, M P L ^b   Natal Jorge, R M ^b   Cesar de Sa J M A ^b   Gracio J J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Anisotropic elasto plasticity; Enhanced transverse shear strain; Large deformations; Large rotations; Shell element; Transverse shear locking

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ANISOTROPY; DEFORMATION; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); ELASTOPLASTICITY; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRAIN; TENSORS;

CLASSICAL DEGENERATION; ENHANCED ASSUMED STRAIN (EAS); SHEAR STRAIN; STRAIN TENSORS;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

DEFORMATION; ELASTOPLASTICITY; MATHEMATICAL METHOD;

EID: 14844290888     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1231     Document Type: Review

References (95)

1. Ahmad S, Irons BM, Zienkiewicz OC. Analysis of thick and thin shell structures by curved finite elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1970; 2:419-451.
2. Krakeland B. Large displacement analysis of shells considering elastic plastic and elasto-viscoplastic materials. Report No. 776, Norwegian Institute of Technology, University of Trondheim, Norway, 1977.
3. Ramm E. A plate/shell Element for large deflections and rotations. In Formulations and Computational Algorithms in Finite Element Analysis, Bathe KJ, Oden JT, Wunderlich W (eds). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1977.
4. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL, Too JM. Reduced integration techniques in general analysis of plates and shells. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1979; 3:275-290.
5. Bathe KJ, Bolourchi S. A geometric and material nonlinear plate and shell element. Computers and Structures 1980; 11:23-48.
6. Hughes TJR, Liu WK. Nonlinear finite element analysis of shells: part I. Three-dimensional shells. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1981; 26:331-362.
7. Hughes TJR, Tezduyar TE. Finite elements based upon Mindlin plate theory with particular reference to the four-node bilinear isoparametric element. Journal of Applied Mechanics (ASME) 1981; 48 587-596.
8. Liu WK, Lam D, Law SE, Belytschko T. Resultant stress degenerated shell element. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1986; 55:259-300.
9. Yang HTY, Saigal S, Masud A, Kapania RK. A survey of recent shell finite elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2000; 47:101-127.
10. Chapelle D, Bathe KJ. Fundamental considerations for the finite element analysis of shell structures. Computers and Structures 1998; 66 19-36.
11. Bathe KJ, losilevich A, Chapelle D. An evaluation of the MITC shell elements. Computers and Structures 2000; 75:1-30.
12. Chapelle D, Bathe KJ. The mathematical shell model underlying general shell elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2000; 48:289-313.
13. Chapelle D. Some new results and current challenges in the finite element analysis of shells. Acta Numerica 2001; 10:215-250.
14. Bathe KJ, Chapelle D, Lee PS. A shell problem 'highly sensitive' to thickness changes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2003; 57:1039-1052.
15. Chapelle D, Bathe KJ. The Finite Element Analysis of Shells Fundamentals. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2003.
16. Hughes TJR, Cohen M, Haroun M. Reduced and selective integration techniques in finite element analysis of plates. Nuclear Engineering Design 1978; 46:203-222.
17. Dvorkin E, Bathe KJ. A continuum mechanics based four-node shell element for general nonlinear analysis. Engineering Computations 1984; 1:77-88.
18. Bathe KJ, Dvorkin E. A formulation of general shell elements-the use of mixed interpolation of tensorial components. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1986; 22:697-722.
19. MacNeal RH. A simple quadrilateral shell element. Computers and Structures 1978; 8:175-183.
20. MacNeal RH. Derivation of element stiffness matrices by assumed strain distribution. Nuclear Engineering Design 1982; 703:3-12.
21. 0 elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1986; 22:281-288.
22. 0 shell element based on assumed natural coordinate strains. Journal of Applied Mechanics 1986; 53 278-290.
23. Stanley GM, Park KC, Hughes TJR. Continuum-based resultant shell elements. In Finite Element Methods for Plate and Shell Structures Hughes TJR, Hinton E (eds). Pineridge Press: Swansea, 1986; 1-45.
24. Simo JC, Rifai MS. A class of mixed assumed strain methods and the method of incompatible modes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1990; 29:1595-1638.
25. Simo JC, Armero F. Geometrically non-linear enhanced strain mixed methods and the method of incompatible modes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1992; 33:1443-1449.
26. Simo JC, Armero F, Taylor RL. Improved versions of assumed enhanced strain tri-linear elements for 3D finite deformation problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1993; 110 359-386.
27. Andelfinger U, Ramm E. EAS-Elements for two-dimensional, three-dimensional, plate and shells and their equivalence to HR-elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1993; 36:1413-1439.
28. Büchter N, Ramm E, Roehl D. Three-dimensional extension of nonlinear shell formulation based on the enhanced assumed strain concept. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1994; 37: 2551-2568.
29. César de Sá JMA, Natal Jorge RM, Fontes Valente RA, Areias PMA. Development of shear locking-free shell elements using an enhanced assumed strain formulation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2002; 53:1721-1750.
30. César de Sá JMA, Natal Jorge RM. New enhanced strain elements for incompressible problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1999; 44:229-248.
31. César de Sá JMA, Areias PMA, Natal Jorge RM. Quadrilateral elements for the solution of elasto-plastic finite strain problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2001; 51:883-917.
32. Fontes Valente RA, Natal Jorge RM, Cardoso RPR, César de Sá JMA, Grácio JJ. On the use of an enhanced transverse shear strain shell element for problems involving large rotations. Computational Mechanics 2003; 30:286-296.
33. Fontes Valente RA. Developments on shell and solid-shell finite elements technology in nonlinear continuum mechanics. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Porto, Portugal, 2004.
34. Alves de Sousa RJ, Natal Jorge RM, Fontes Valente RA, César de Sá JMA. A new volumetric and shear locking-free 3D enhanced strain element. Engineering Computations 2003; 20:896-925.
35. Fontes Valente RA, Alves de Sousa RJ, Natal Jorge RM. An enhanced strain 3D element for large deformation elastoplastic thin-shell applications. Computational Mechanics 2004; 34:38-52.
36. Areias PMA, César de Sá JMA, Conceiçao António CA, Fernandes AA. Analysis of 3D problems using a new enhanced strain hexahedral element. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2003; 58:1637-1682.
37. Bathe KJ. Finite Element Procedures (2nd edn). Prentice-Hall: New Jersey, 1996.
38. ABAQUS Theory Manual. Version 6.3. Hibbit, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc.: Rhode-Island, USA, 2002.
39. Hughes TJR. The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis (2nd edn). Dover Editions: Toronto, 2000.
40. Yoon JW, Yang DY, Chung K. Elasto-plastic finite element method based on incremental deformation theory and continuum based shell elements for planar anisotropic sheet materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1999; 174:23-56.
41. Cardoso RPR, Yon JW, Grácio JJA, Barlat F, César de Sá JMA. Development of a one point quadrature shell element for nonlinear applications with contact and anisotropy. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2002; 191:5177-5206.
42. Saleeb AF, Chang TY, Graf W, Yingyeunyong S. A hybrid/mixed model for non-linear shell analysis and its applications to large-rotation problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1990; 29:407-446.
43. Basar Y, Weicher D. Nonlinear Continuum Mechanics of Solids. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2000.
44. Bütcher N, Ramm E. Shell theory versus degeneration-a comparison in large rotation finite element analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1992; 34:39-59.
45. Betsch P, Manzel A, Stein E. On parameterization of finite rotations in computational mechanics. A classification of concepts with application to smooth shells. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1998; 155:273-305.
46. Doyle JF. Nonlinear Analysis of Thin-Walled Structures Statics: Dynamics and Stability. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2001.
47. Crisfield MA. Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures, vol. 2. Advanced Topics. Wiley: West Sussex, 1997.
48. Franca LP. An algorithm to compute the square root of a 3 × 3 positive definite matrix. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 1989; 18:459-466.
49. Qin Z, Chen Z. Large deformation analysis of shells with finite element method based on the SR decomposition theorem. Computers and Structures 1988; 30:957-961.
50. Peng X, Crisfield MA. A consistent corotational formulation for shells using the constant stress/constant moment triangle. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1992; 35:1829-1847.
51. Jiang L, Chernuka MW. A simple four-noded corotational shell element for arbitrarily large rotations. Computers and Structures 1994; 53 1123-1132.
52. Jiang L, Chernuka MW. A co-rotational, updated lagrangean formulation for geometrically nonlinear finite element analysis of shell structures. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 1994; 18:129-140.
53. Moita GF, Crisfield MA. A finite element formulation for 3D continua using the corotational technique. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1996; 39:3775-3792.
54. Belytschko T, Liu WK, Moran B. Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures. Wiley: West Sussex, England, 2000.
55. Masud A, Tham CL, Liu WK. A stabilized 3D co-rotational formulation for geometrically nonlinear analysis of multi-layered composite shells. Computational Mechanics 2000; 26:1-12.
56. Masud A, Tham CL. Three-dimensional corotational framework for finite deformation elasto-plastic analysis of multilayered composite shells. AIAA American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal 2000; 38:1-8.
57. Bischoff M, Ramm E. Shear deformable shell elements for large strains and rotations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1997; 40:4427-4449.
58. Klinkel S, Wagner W. A geometrical nonlinear brick element based on the EAS-method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1997; 40:4529-4545.
59. Klinkel S, Gruttman F, Wagner W. A continuum based 3D-shell element for laminated structures. Computers and Structures 1999; 74 43-62.
60. Vu-Quoc L, Tan XG. Optimal solid shells for non-linear analysis of multilayer composites. Part I: statics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2003; 192:975-1016.
61. Miehe C. A theoretical and computational model for isotropic elastoplastic stress analysis in shells at large strains. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1998; 155:193-233.
62. Freischlager C, Schweizerhof K. On a systematic development of trilinear three-dimensional solid elements based on Simo's enhanced strain formulation. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1996; 33: 2993-3017.
63. Roehl D, Ramm E. Large elasto-plastic finite element analysis of solids and shells with the enhanced assumed strain concept. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1996; 33:3215-3237.
64. Flanagan DP, Taylor LM. An accurate numerical algorithm for stress integration with finite rotations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1987; 62:305-320.
65. Marsden JE, Hughes TJR. Mathematical Foundations of Elasticity. Dover Publications: Mineola, USA, 1994.
66. Doghri I. Mechanics of Deformable Solids-Linear, Nonlinear, Analytical and Computational Aspects. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2000.
67. Hughes TJR. Numerical implementation of constitutive models: rate independent deviatoric plasticity. In Theoretical Foundations for Large-Computations for Non-Linear Material Behavior, Nemat-Nasser S et al. (eds). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1984.
68. Key SW, Krieg RD. On the numerical implementation of inelastic time dependent and time independent finite strain constitutive equations in structural mechanics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1982; 33:439-452.
69. Pinsky PM, Ortiz M, Pister KS. Numerical integration of rate constitutive equations in finite deformation analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1983; 40:137-158.
70. Ortiz M, Popov EP. Accuracy and stability of integration algorithms for elastoplastic constitutive relations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1985; 21:1561-1576.
71. Ramm E, Matzenmiller A. Consistent linearization in elasto-plastic shell analysis. Engineering Computations 1988; 5:289-299.
72. Brank B, Peric D, Damjanic FB. On large deformations of thin elasto-plastic shells: implementation of a finite rotation model for a quadrilateral shell element. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1997; 40:689-726.
73. Hill R. A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences 1948; 193:281-297.
74. Barlat F, Lege DJ, Brem JC. A six-component yield function for anisotropic metals. International Journal of Plasticity 1991; 7 693-712.
75. Chroscielewski J, Makowski J, Stumpf H. Genuinely resultant shell finite elements accounting for geometric and material non-linearities. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1992; 35:63-94.
76. Ibrahimbegović A, Frey F. Stress resultant geometrically nonlinear shell theory with drilling rotation Part II: computational aspects. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1994; 188 285-308.
77. Betsch P, Gruttmann F, Stein E. A 4-node finite shell element for the implementation of general hyperelastic 3D-elasticity at finite strains. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1996; 130 57-79.
78. Eberlein R, Wriggers P. Finite element concepts for finite elastoplastic strains and isotropic stress response in shells: theoretical and computational analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1999; 171:243-279.
79. Li M, Zhan F. The finite deformation theory for beam, plate and shells. Part V: the shell element with drilling degrees of freedom based on biot strain. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2000; 189:743-759.
80. Crisfield MA. A fast incremental/iterative solution procedure that handle 'snap-through'. Computers and Structures 1981; 13 55-62.
81. Crisfield MA. An arc-length method including line searches and accelerations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1983; 19:1269-1289.
82. de Souza Neto EA, Feng YT. On the determination of the path direction for arc-length methods in the presence of bifurcations and 'snap-backs'. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1999; 179 81-89.
83. Betsch P, Stein E. Numerical implementation of multiplicative elasto-plasticity into assumed strain elements with application to shells at large strains. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1999; 179:215-245.
84. Hauptmann R, Schweizerhof K, Doll S. Extension of the solid-shell concept for application to large elastic and large elastoplastic deformations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2000; 49:1121-1141.
85. Doll S, Schweizerhof K, Hauptmann R, Freischläger C. On volumetric locking of low-order solid and solid-shell elements for finite elastoviscoplastic deformations and selective reduced integration. Engineering Computations 2000; 17:874-902.
86. Harnau M, Schweizerhof K. About linear and quadratic 'solid-shell' elements at large deformations. Computers and Structures 2002; 80:805-817.
87. Simo JC, Kennedy JG. On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part V: nonlinear plasticity-formulation and integration algorithms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1992; 96:133-171.
88. Wriggers P, Eberlein R, Reese S. A comparison of three-dimensional continuum and shell elements for finite plasticity. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1996; 33:3309-3326.
89. Sorić J, Montag U, Krätzig WB. An efficient formulation of integration algorithms for elastoplastic shell analysis based on layered finite element approach. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1997; 148:315-328.
90. Sansour C, Kollmann FG. Families of 4-node and 9-node finite elements for a finite deformation shell theory: An assessment of hybrid stress, hybrid strain and enhanced strain elements. Computational Mechanics 2000; 24:435-447.
91. Yoon JW. Finite element formulation based on incremental deformation theory for sheet metal forming of planar anisotropic materials. Ph.D. Dissertation, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), South Korea, 1996.
92. Cardoso RPR. Development of one point quadrature shell elements with anisotropic material models for sheet metal forming analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Aveiro, Portugal, 2002.
93. Zhang SH, Danckert J, Nielsen KB. Integral hydro-bulge forming of pressure vessel heads. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 1999; 86:184-189.
94. Wang ZR, Wang T, Kang DC, Zhang SH, Fang Y. The technology of the hydro-bulging of whole spherical vessels and experimental analysis. Journal of Mechanical Working Technology 1989; 18:85-94.
95. Zhang SH, Wang ZR. Research into the dieless hydroforming of double-layer spherical vessels. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 1994; 60:145-149.