The comparative failure of machine politics, administrative resources and fraud

Canadian Slavonic Papers

Volumn 47, Issue 3-4, 2005, Pages 361-384

  Zimmer, Kerstin ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43249169661     PISSN: 00085006     EISSN: 23752475     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00085006.2005.11092392     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Paul D’Anieri, “The Last Hurrah: The 2004 Ukrainian Presidential Elections and the Limits of Machine Politics,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 38.2 (2005): 231-49;
2. Henry E. Hale, “Machine Politics and Institutionalized Electorates: A Comparative Analysis of Six Duma Elections in Bashkortostan,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 15.4 (1999): 70-110;
3. Hale, “Explaining Machine Politics in Russia’s Regions: Economy, Ethnicity, and Legacy,” Post-Soviet Affairs 19.3 (2003): 228-63;
4. Kimitaka Matsuzato, “All Kuchma’s Men: The Reshuffling of Ukrainian Governors and the Presidential Election of 1999,” Post-Soviet Geography and Economics 42.6 (2001): 416-39;
5. Matsuzato, “From Communist Boss Politics to Post-Communist Caciquismo: The Meso-Elite and Meso-Governments in Post-Communist Countries,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 34.2 (2001): 175-201;
6. Matsuzato, “From Ethno-Bonapartism to Centralized Caciquismo: Characteristics and Origins of the Tatarstan Political Regime, 1990-2000,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 17.4 (2001): 43-77;
7. Matsuzato, “Elites and the Party System of Zakarpattya Oblast’: Relations among Levels of Party System in Ukraine,” Europe-Asia Studies 54.8 (2002): 1267-99.
8. Edward C. Banfield and James Q. Wilson, City Politics (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1963) 115.
9. James C. Scott, “Corruption, Machine Politics and Political Change,” American Political Science Review 63.4 (1969): 1142-58
10. James C. Scott, Comparative Political Corruption (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1972).
11. Scott, Comparative Political Corruption 99.
12. Herbert Kitschelt, “Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities,” Comparative Political Studies 33.6-7 (2000): 845-79
13. Robert K. Merton, “The Latent Functions of the Machine,” in Urban Government. A Reader in Administration and Politics, ed. Edward C. Banfield (New York: Free Press, 1969) 223-33.
14. Martin Meyerson and Edward C. Banfield, “A Machine at Work,” in Urban Government. A Reader in Administration and Politics, ed. Edward C. Banfield (New York: Free Press, 1969) 169-79.
15. Scott, Comparative Political Corruption 108.
16. Scott, Comparative Political Corruption 100.
17. Scott, “Corruption, Machine Politics and Political Change” 1150.
18. Scott, Comparative Political Corruption 109.
19. Ellen Bos, “Das politische System der Ukraine,” in Die politischen Systeme Osteuropas, ed. Wolfgang Ismayr (Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 2004) 469-514
20. Ulf Engel and Gero Erdmann, Neopatrimonialism Reconsidered-Critical Review and Elaboration of an Elusive Concept (Conference Paper, Washington D.C., 45th annual Meeting of the African Studies Association: 2002).
21. Michael McFaul, “Explaining Party Formation and Nonformation in Russia. Actors, Institutions, and Chance,” Comparative Political Studies 34.10 (2001): 1169.
22. Keith A. Darden, “Blackmail as a Tool of State Domination: Ukraine under Kuchma,” East European Constitutional Review 10.2-3 (2001) .
23. Matsuzato, “From Communist Boss Politics to Post-Communist Caciquismo” 184.
24. Matsuzato, “All Kuchma’s Men” 427.
25. Olexii Haran, “Ukraine,” in Nations in Transit. Civil Society, Democracy, and Markets in East Central Europe and the Newly Independent States, eds. Adrian Karatnycky, Alexander Motyl and Amanda Schnetzer (Washington, DC: Freedom House, 2001) 398
26. Matsuzato, “All Kuchma’s Men,” 41.
27. Andrew Konitzer-Smirnov, To Appoint or Elect? Regional Executives and Economic Performance in Russia and Ukraine (Philadelphia, 99th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association: 2003).
28. Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, Preliminary Statement on the Second Round of the Presidential Election in Ukraine, 21 November 2004 (Warsaw: ODIHR, 2004) 10.
29. Claudia Šabiü and Kerstin Zimmer, “Ukraine: The Genesis of a Captured State,” in The Making of Regions in Post-Socialist Europe: The Impact of History, Economic Structure and Institutions. Case Studies from Poland, Hungary, Romania and Ukraine, ed. Melanie Tatur (Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2004) 107-30.
30. Kerstin Zimmer, “The Captured Region: Actors and Institutions in the Ukrainian Donbass,” in The Making of Regions in Post-Socialist Europe 314.
31. Erik S. Herron and Paul E. Johnson, “It Doesn’t Matter Who Votes, but Who Counts the Votes’: Assessing Fraud in Ukraine’s 2002 Parliamentary Elections (Kansas: University/Center for Russian and East European Studies, 2003)
32. Taras Kuzio, “Parliamentary Elections in the ‘Blackmail State’,” Prism 8.1 (2002) .
33. Gary A. Ferguson, Public Opinion in Ukraine 1999 (Washington: International Foundation for Election Systems, 1999)
34. Rakesh Sharma, Public Opinion in Ukraine 2002: Findings from an IFES Survey (Washington: International Foundation for Election Systems, 2003)
35. Rakesh Sharma and Nathan Van Dusen, Attitudes and Expectations: Public Opinion in Ukraine 2003 (Washington: International Foundation for Election Systems, 2004).
36. James Sherr, Ukraine’s Parliamentary Elections: The Limits of Manipulation (Camberley: Conflict Studies Research Centre, 2002).
37. OSCE/OHDIR, Ukraine. Presidential Elections. 31 October and 14 November 1999 (Warsaw: 2000)
38. OSCE/OHDIR, Ukraine. Parliamentary Elections. 31 March 2002 (Warsaw: 2002).
39. Matsuzato, “From Communist Boss Politics to Post-Communist Caciquismo” 179-80.
40. Hale, “Explaining Machine Politics in Russia’s Regions” 230.
41. Hale, “Explaining Machine Politics in Russia’s Regions” 229.
42. Matsuzato, “From Communist Boss Politics to Post-Communist Caciquismo” 193.
43. Zimmer, “The Captured Region” 317-18.
44. Zimmer, “The Captured Region” 312-14.
45. Central Electoral Commission, (last viewed 30 March 2005).
46. Serhii Harmash, “Legal Farce,” Zerkalo nedeli 16-22 February 2002.
47. Zimmer, “The Captured Region” 317-19.
48. Committee of Voters of Ukraine, Summary of Long Term Observation Report on 2002 Parliamentary Elections (Kyiv: 2001).
49. Ukraiins’kyi Monitor dlia Vilʼnykh Vyboriv, Monitoryng Rivnia Dostupu do SMI. Monitoryng Rivnia Iakisnoho Informuvannia Vybortsiv (2002).
50. Kerstin Zimmer, “The Donets’k Factor,” Transitions Online, 17 December 2004.
51. http://www.obkom.net.ua.
52. Eberhard Schneider, Das politische System der Ukraine. Eine Einführung (Wiesbaden: VS Verl. für Sozialwissenschaften, 2005) 76-7.
53. Hale, “Explaining Machine Politics in Russia’s Regions,” 232. and 245.
54. Janine R. Wedel, Blurring the Boundaries of the State-Private Divide: Implications for Corruption (Copenhagen, European Association of Social Anthropologists (EASA): 2002).
55. Oleg Varfolomeyev, “Whose Ukraine?" Transitions Online 14 March 2002.
56. http://www.ostro.org.
57. http://www.lukyanchenko.donetsk.ua
58. http://www.ukranews.com.
59. Oleksandr Sushko, “The 2002 Parliamentary Elections as an Indicator of the Sociopolitical Development of Ukraine,” Demokratizatsiia 10.4 (2002): 571.