Handheld Computers for Direct Observation of the Social and Physical Environment

Field Methods

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 382-397

  Gravlee, Clarence C ^a   Zenk, Shannon N ^b   Woods, Sachiko ^c   Rowe, Zachary ^d   Schulz, Amy J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d Friends of Parkside ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

data collection; handheld computers; observation; social environment

Indexed keywords

EID: 43249167284     PISSN: 1525822X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X06293067     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Barrett, L. F., and D. J. Barrett. 2001. An introduction to computerized experience sampling in psychology. Social Science Computer Review 19 (2): 175–185.
2. Bassett, J. F., and J. M. Dabbs. 2005. A portable version of the go/no-go association task (GNAT). Behavior Research Methods 37 (3): 506–512.
3. Bernhardt, J. M., V. J. Strecher, K. Bishop, P. Potts, E. M. Madison, and J. Thorp. 2001. Handheld computer-assisted self-interviews: User comfort level and preferences. American Journal of Health Behavior 25 (6): 557–563.
4. Bernhardt, J. M., S. Usdan, and A. Burnett. 2005. Using handheld computers for daily alcohol assessment: Results from a pilot study. Journal of Substance Use 10 (6): 347–353.
5. Bobula, J. A., L. S. Anderson, S. K. Riesch, J. Canty-Mitchell, A. Duncan, H. A. Kaiser-Krueger, R. L. Brown, and N. Angresano. 2004. Enhancing survey data collection among youth and adults: Use of handheld and laptop computers. Computers, Informatics, Nursing 22 (5): 255–265.
6. Caughy, M. O., P. J. O'Campo, and J. Patterson. 2001. A brief observational measure for urban neighborhoods. Health & Place 7 (3): 225–236.
7. Couper, M. P. 2000. Usability evaluation of computer-assisted survey instruments. Social Science Computer Review 18 (4): 384–396.
8. Couper, M. P., S. E. Hansen, and S. A. Sadosky. 1997. Evaluating interviewer performance in a CAPI survey. In Survey measurement and process quality, edited by L. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, E. de Leeuw, C. Dippo, N. Schwarz, and D. Trewin, 267–285. New York: John Wiley.
9. Couper, M. P., and W. L. Nicholls II. 1998. The history and development of computer assisted survey information collection methods. In Computer assisted survey information collection, edited by M. P. Couper, R. P. Baker, J. Bethlehem, C. Z. F. Clark, J. Martin, W. L. Nicholls II, and J. M. O'Reilly, 1–17. New York: John Wiley.
10. Craig, C. L., R. C. Brownson, S. E. Cragg, and A. L. Dunn. 2002. Exploring the effect of the environment on physical activity: A study examining walking to work. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 23 (2, suppl. 1): 36–43.
11. Cummins, S., S. Macintyre, S. Davidson, and A. Ellaway. 2005. Measuring neighbourhood social and material context: Generation and interpretation of ecological data from routine and non-routine sources. Health & Place 11 (3): 249–260.
12. Cunningham, G. O., Y. L. Michael, S. A. Farquhar, and J. Lapidus. 2005. Developing a reliable senior walking environmental assessment tool. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 29 (3): 215–217.
13. de Heer, W. F. 1991. The use of handheld computers in social surveys of the Netherlands Central Bureau of Statistics. The Statistician 40: 125–138.
14. de Leeuw, E., J. Hox, and S. Kef. 2003. Computer-assisted self-interviewing tailored for special populations and topics. Field Methods 15 (3): 223–251.
15. de Leeuw, E., and W. L. Nicholls II. 1996. Technological innovations in data collection: Acceptance, data quality and costs. Sociological Research Online 1 (4). Available at http://www.socresonline.org.uk/1/4/leeuw.html.
16. Diez Roux, A. V. 2003. Residential environments and cardiovascular risk. Journal of Urban Health 80 (4): 569–589.
17. Dixon, M. R. 2003. Creating a portable data-collection system with Microsoft(R) embedded visual tools for the pocket PC. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 36 (2): 271–284.
18. Ellen, I. G., T. Mijanovich, and K.-N. Dillman. 2001. Neighborhood effects on health: Exploring the links and assessing the evidence. Journal of Urban Affairs 23 (3–4): 391–408.
19. Emery, J., C. Crump, and P. Bors. 2003. Reliability and validity of two instruments designed to assess the walking and bicycling suitability of sidewalks and roads. American Journal of Health Promotion 18 (1): 38–46.
20. Farquhar, S. A. 2000. Effects of the perceptions and observations of environmental stressors on health and well-being in residents of eastside and southwest Detroit. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
21. Fletcher, L. A., D. J. Erickson, T. L. Toomey, and A. C. Wagenaar. 2003. Handheld computers: A feasible alternative to paper forms for field data collection. Evaluation Review 27 (2): 165–178.
22. Forster, D., and R. W. Snow. 1995. An assessment of the use of hand-held computers during demographic surveys in developing countries. Survey Methodology 21 (20): 179–184.
23. Gravlee, C. C. 2002. Mobile computer-assisted personal interviewing (MCAPI) with handheld computers: The Entryware System v3.0. Field Methods 14 (3): 322–336.
24. Greene, P. D. 2001. Handheld computers as tools for writing and managing field data. Field Methods 13 (2): 181–197.
25. Hewett, P. C., A. S. Erulkar, and B. S. Mensch. 2004. The feasibility of computer-assisted survey interviewing in Africa: Experience from two rural districts in Kenya. Social Science Computer Review 22 (3): 319–334.
26. Ice, G. H. 2004. Technological advances in observational data collection: The advantages and limitations of computer-assisted data collection. Field Methods 16 (3): 352–375.
27. Johannes, C. B., S. L. Crawford, J. Woods, R. B. Goldstein, D. Tran, S. Mehrotra, K. B. Johnson, and N. Santoro. 2000. An electronic menstrual cycle calendar: Comparison of data quality with a paper version. Menopause 7 (3): 200–208.
28. Johannes, C., J. Woods, S. Crawford, H. Cochran, D. Tran, and B. Schuth. 2000. Electronic versus paper instruments for daily data collection. Annals of Epidemiology 10 (7): 457-457.
29. Kahng, S., and B. A. Iwata. 1998. Computerized systems for collecting real-time observational data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 31 (2): 253–261.
30. Kawachi, I., and L. F. Berkman. 2003. Neighborhoods and health. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Koop, A., and R. Mosges. 2002. The use of handheld computers in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 23 (5): 469–480.
32. Macintyre, S., A. Ellaway, and S. Cummins. 2002. Place effects on health: How can we conceptualise, operationalise and measure them? Social Science & Medicine 55 (1): 125–139.
33. McGuire, J. B. 1997. The reliability and validity of a questionnaire describing neighborhood characteristics relevant to families and young children living in urban areas. Journal of Community Psychology 25 (6): 551–566.
34. Parr, C. S., T. Jones, and N. B. Songer. 2004. Evaluation of a handheld data collection interface for science learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology 13 (2): 233–242.
35. Pikora, T. J., F. C. L. Bull, K. Jamrozik, M. Knuiman, B. Giles-Corti, and R. J. Donovan. 2002. Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 23 (3): 187–194.
36. Raudenbush, S. W., and R. J. Sampson. 1999. Ecometrics: Toward a science of assessing ecological settings, with application to the systematic social observation of neighborhoods. Sociological Methodology 29 (1): 1–41.
37. Robert, S. A. 1999. Socioeconomic position and health: The independent contribution of community socioeconomic context. Annual Review of Sociology 25: 489–516.
38. Sampson, R. J., J. D. Morenoff, and T. Gannon-Rowley. 2002. Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 443–478.
39. Sampson, R. J., and S. W. Raudenbush. 1999. Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology 105 (3): 603–651.
40. Schlossberg, M. N.d. From TIGER to audit instruments: Using GIS-based street data to measure neighborhood walkability. Transportation Research Record. Under review.
41. Schulz, A. J., S. Kannan, J. T. Dvonch, B. A. Israel, A. Allen, S. A. James, J. S. House, and J. Lepkowski. 2005. Social and physical environments and disparities in risk for cardiovascular disease: The Healthy Environments Partnership conceptual model. Environmental Health Perspectives 113 (12): 1817–1825.
42. Tourangeau, R. 2004. Survey research and societal change. Annual Review of Psychology 55: 775–801.
43. Trapl, E. S., E. A. Borawski, P. P. Stork, L. D. Lovegreen, N. Colabianchi, M. L. Cole, and J. M. Charvat. 2005. Use of audio-enhanced personal digital assistants for school-based data collection. Journal of Adolescent Health 37 (4): 296–305.
44. van Griensven, F., S. Naorat, P. H. Kilmarx, S. Jeeyapant, C. Manopaiboon, S. Chaikummao, R. A. Jenkins, W. Uthaivoravit, P. Wasinrapee, P. A. Mock, and J. W. Tappero. 2006. Palmtop-assisted self-interviewing for the collection of sensitive behavioral data: Randomized trial with drug use urine testing. American Journal of Epidemiology 163 (3): 271–278.
45. Villordon, A., J. Franklin, and D. LaBonte. 2004. Using personal digital assistants and database forms as tools for field data collection: Practical experiences from research trials. HortTechnology 14 (3): 402–405.
46. Weber, B. A., and B. L. Roberts. 2000. Data collection using handheld computers. Nursing Research 49 (3): 173–175.
47. Weich, S., E. Burton, M. Blanchard, M. Prince, K. Sproston, and B. Erens. 2001. Measuring the built environment: Validity of a site survey instrument for use in urban settings. Health & Place 7 (4): 283–292.
48. Zenk, S. N., A. J. Schulz, J. S. House, A. Benjamin, and S. Kannan. 2005. Application of community-based participatory research in the design of an observational tool: The Neighborhood Observational Checklist. In Methods in community-based participatory research for health, edited by B. A. Israel, E. Eng, A. J. Schulz, and E. A. Parker, 167–187. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
49. Zenk, S. N., A. J. Schulz, G. Mentz, J. S. House, C. C. Gravlee, P. Miranda, P. Miller, and S. Kannan. N.d. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability: Methods and results for the neighborhood observational checklist. Health & Place: in press.