Integrating exchange and heuristic theories of survey nonresponse

Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 28-44

  Goyder, John ^a   Boyer, Luc ^a   Martinelli, Guil ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b College of Nurses of Ontario ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Enqu tes; Exchange Theory; Heuristic Theory; Surveys; Theories of Survey Nonresponse; Th orie de la non r ponse; Th orie des changes; Th orie heuristique

Indexed keywords

EID: 43249165976     PISSN: 07591063     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/075910630609200104     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Babbie, Earl R. (1973) Survey Research Methods. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.
2. Beach, Lee Roy, and Terence R. Mitchell (1978) “A contingency model for the selection of décision strategies”, Academy of Management Review 3: 439–449.
3. Befu, Harumi (1977) “Social Exchange”, Annual Review of Anthropology 6: 255–281.
4. Berry, Sandra H., and David E. Kanouse. (1987) “Physician response to a mailed survey: an experiment in timing of payment”, Public Opinion Quarterly 51: 102–114.
5. Blau, Peter M. (1963) The Dynamics of Bureaucracy. Second Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Blau Peter. M. (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
7. Brehm, John (1993) The Phantom Respondents: Opinion Surveys and Political Representation. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
8. Camic, Charles (1986) “The matter of habit”, American Journal of Sociology 91: 1039–1087.
9. Cialdini, Robert B. (1993) Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. New York: William Morrow.
10. Cox, E.P. (1976) “A cost/benefit view of prepaid monetary incentives in mail questionnaires”, Public Opinion Quarterly 40: 101–104.
11. de Leeuw, Edith (1999) “How do successful and less successful interviewers differ in tactics for combating survey nonresponse?”, Bulletin de Méthodologique Sociologique 62: 29–42.
12. de Leeuw, Edith, and Wim de Heer (2002) “Trends in household survey nonresponse: a longitudinal and international comparison”, In Survey Nonresponse, editors Robert M. Groves, Don A. Dillman, John L. Eltinge and Roderick J.A. Little, pp. 41–54. New York: Wiley.
13. Dillman, Don A. (1978) Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method for Surveys. New York: Wiley.
14. Dillman, Don A. (2000) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Second Edition. New York: Wiley.
15. Dillman, Don A., Joye J. Dillman, and Carole J. Makela (1984) “The importance of adhering to details of the Total Design Method (TDM) for mail surveys”, in Source Book 22, New Directions for Program Evaluation, editor Daniel C. Lockhart, pp. 49–64. San Francisco: JosseyBass.
16. Durand, Claire, A. Blais, and M. Lemay (2002) “Cultural aspects of survey nonresponse, an empirical assessment”, in Social Science Methodology in the New Millennium. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Logic and Methodology, editors Jörg Blasius, Joop Hox, Edith de Leeuw, and Peter Schmidt. Verlag Leske and Budrich, ISBN 3–8100–3316–2.
17. Emmerson, R.M. (1976) “Social exchange theory”, in Annual Review of Sociology, editors Alex Inkeles, James Coleman, and Neil Smelser, pp. 335–62. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews, Inc.
18. Gallegos, Jean G. (1974) An Experiment in Maximizing Response to Telephone Interviews Through Use of a Preliminary Letter, Based on the Principles of Exchange Theory. Master's Thesis, Washington State University.
19. Gergen, Kenneth J., Martin S. Greenberg and Richard H. Willis (1980) Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research. New York: Plenum.
20. Gordon, W. Terrence (1997) Marshall McLuhan: Escape into Understanding. Toronto: Stoddart.
21. Gouldner, Alvin (1960) “The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement”, American Sociological Review 25: 161–178.
22. Goyder, John (1987) The Silent Minority: Nonrespondents on Sample Surveys. Cambridge: Polity Press.
23. Groves, Robert M. (1989) Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: Wiley.
24. Groves, Robert M. (2005) “Total Survey Error”, part of a plenary session at the 60th Annual AAPOR Conference, Miami, May 12–15.
25. Groves, R.M., R.B. Cialdini, and M.P. Couper (1992) “Understanding the decision to participate in a survey”, Public Opinion Quarterly 56, 475–95.
26. Groves, Robert M., and Mick P. Couper (1998) Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
27. Groves, Robert M., Don A. Dillman, John L. Eltinge and Roderick J.A. Little (2002) Survey Nonresponse. New York: Wiley Inter-science.
28. Groves, R., E. Singer and A. Coming (2000) “Leverage-salience theory of survey participation: Description and an illustration”, Public Opinion Quarterly 64: 299–308.
29. Groves, R., S. Presser and S. Dipko (2004) “The Role of Topic Interest in Survey Participation Decisions”, Public Opinion Quarterly 68: 2–31.
30. Gunn, Walter J., and Isabelle N. Rhodes (1981) “Physician response rates to a telephone survey: effects of monetary incentive level”, Public Opinion Quarterly 45: 109–115.
31. Halpern, S.D., P.A. Ubel, J.A. Berlin, and D.A. Asch (2002) “Randomized trial of 5 dollars versus 10 dollars monetary incentives, envelope size, and candy to increase physician response rates to mailed questionnaires”, Medical Care 40: 834–839.
32. Hauser, Robert M. (2005) “Survey response in the long run: the Wisconsin longitudinal study”, Field Methods 17: 3–29.
33. Hawkins, D.F. (1975) “Estimation of nonresponse bias”, Sociological Methods and Research 3: 461–488.
34. Heath, Anthony (1976) Rational Choice and Social Exchange: A Critique of Exchange Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Homans, George C. (1958) “Social behavior as exchange”, American Journal of Sociology 63: 597–606.
36. Hox, J., E. de Leeuw, and H. Vorst (1995) “Survey participation as reasoned action: a behavioural paradigm for survey nonresponse?”, Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique 47: 52–67.
37. Hyman, Herbert (1954) Interviewing in Social Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Johnson, Timothy P., D. O'Rourke, J. Burris, and L. Owens (2002). “Culture and survey nonresponse”, in Survey Nonresponse, editors Robert M. Groves, Don A. Dillman, John L. Eltinge and Roderick J.A. Little, pp. 55–69. New York: Wiley.
39. Kaplowitz, M.D., and F. Lupi (2004). “Color photographs and mail survey response rates”, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 16: 199–206.
40. Keeter, S., A. Kohut, A. Miller, R. Groves, and S. Presser (2000) “Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a large national telephone survey”, Public Opinion Quarterly 64: 125–148.
41. Kendall, Patricia L., and Paul F. Lazarsfeld (1950) “Problems of survey analysis”, in Continuities in Social Research: Studies in the Scope and Method of “The American Soldier, ” editors Robert K. Merton and Paul F. Lazarsfeld, pp. 133–196. Glencoe: Free Press.
42. Kuper, Adam (1983) Anthropology and Anthropologists: The Modern British School. Revised edition. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
43. Lemay, Michael, and Claire Durand (2002) “The effect of interviewer attitude on survey cooperation”, Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique 76: 26–44.
44. Linsky, A.S. (1975) “Stimulating responses to mailed questionnaires: a review”, Public Opinion Quarterly 39: 82–101.
45. Makoba, Wagona J. (1993) “Toward a General Theory of Social Exchange”, Social Behaviour and Personality 21: 227–240
46. Malinowski, Bronislaw (1926) Crime and Custom in Savage Society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
47. Menzies, Ken (1982) Sociological Theory in Use. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
48. Mizes, J. Scott, E. Louis Fleece, and Cindy Roos (1984) “Incentives for increasing retum rates: magnitude levels, response bias, and format”, Public Opinion Quarterly 48: 794–800.
49. Morton-Williams, Jean (1993) Interviewer Approaches. Aldershot, U.K.: Dartmouth.
50. Putnam, Robert D. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
51. Riesman, David (1950) The Lonely Crowd: A Study in the Changing American Character. New Haven: Yale University Press.
52. Rizzo, L., J.M. Brick and I. Park (2004) “A minimally intrusive method for sampling persons in random digit dial surveys”, Public Opinion Quarterly 68: 267–274.
53. Stoop, A.L. (2005) The Hunt for the Last Respondent: Nonresponse on Sample Surveys. The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Office.
54. Stock, V., and B. Langfeldt (2004) “Effects of survey experience on respondents' attitudes towards surveys”, Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique 81: 5–32.
55. Teitler, J.O., N.E. Reichman and S. Sprachman (2003) “Costs and benefits of improving response rates for a hard-to-reach population”, Public Opinion Quarterly 67: 126–138.
56. Turner, Jonathan H. (1991) The Structure of Sociological Theory. Fifth edition. Belmont, California: Wadsworth.
57. Warriner, Keith, John Goyder, Heidi Gjertsen, Paula Hohner, and Kathleen McSpurren (1996) “Charities, no; lotteries, no; cash, yes: main effects and interactions in a Canadian incentives experiment”, Public Opinion Quarterly 60: 542–562.
58. Wrong, Dennis H. (1961) “The over-socialized conception of man”, American Sociological Review 26: 183–193.
59. Wurman, Richard Saul (1989) Information Anxiety. New York: Doubleday.
60. Zafirovski, M. (2003) Some Amendments to Social Exchange Theory: A Sociological perspective. CAAP. Retrieved on March 22, 2004 from http://theoryandscience.icaap.org/content/vo1004.002/01_zafirovski.html
61. Zafirovski, M. (2005) Social Exchange Theory under Scrutiny: A Positive Critique of its Economic-Behaviorist Formulations. Electronic Journal of Sociology. Retrieved on December 10th 2005 from www.sociology.org/content/2005/tier2/SETheory.pdf.