Participation and genres of communication in online settings of higher education

Education and Information Technologies

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 129-146

  Jaldemark, Jimmy ^a  

^a MID SWEDEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Acquisition; Bakhtin; Discourse analysis; Educational settings; Higher education; Learning management systems; Online; Participation

Indexed keywords

EID: 43249115817     PISSN: 13602357     EISSN: 15737608     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-008-9057-9     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bakhtin, M. M. (1935/1981). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.) The dialogic imagination: Four essays (pp. 259-422). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1953/1986). The problem of speech genres. In C. Emerson, & M. Holquist (Eds.) Speech genres & other late essays (pp. 60-102). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
3. Björck, U. (2004). Distributed problem-based learning: Studies of a pedagogical model in practice. Ph.D. thesis, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
4. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 17(1), 32-42.
5. Buzzelli, C. (1996). The moral implications of teacher-child discourse in early childhood classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11(4), 515-534.
6. Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1949/1960). Knowing and the known. Boston, MA: Beacon.
7. Dysthe, O. (2002). The learning potential of a web-mediated discussion in a university course. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3), 339-352.
8. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
9. Hoetker, J., & Ahlbrand, W. (1969). The persistence of recitation. American Educational Research, 6(2), 145-167.
10. Hultin, E. (2006). Samtalsgenrer i gymnasieskolans litteraturundervisning: En ämnesdidaktisk studie (Conversational genres in the teaching of literature: A study within the field of subject-didactics). Ph.D. thesis, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
11. Jonassen, D. H., & Land, S. M. (2000a). Preface. In D. H. Jonassen, & S. M. Land (Eds.) Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. iii-xiii). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Jonassen, D. H., & Land, S. M. (2000b). Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Jones, S. (1999). Studying the net: Intricacies and issues. In S. Jones (Ed.) Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the net (pp. 1-27). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Kamhi-Stein, L. D. (2000). Looking to the future of TESOL teacher education: Web-based bulletin board discussions in a method course. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 423-455.
15. Kvale, S. (1989). To validate is to question. In S. Kvale (Ed.) Issues of validity in qualitative research (pp. 73-92). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
16. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
17. Lotman, Y. (1988). Text within a text. Soviet Psychology, 26(3), 32-51.
18. Lundgren, U. P. (1981). Model analysis of pedagogical processes (2nd ed.). Lund, Sweden: CWK/Gleerup.
19. Martin, C. (2004). From other to self: Learning as interactional change. Ph.D. thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
20. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Mercer, N., & Wegerif, R. (1999). Is 'exploratory talk' productive talk? In K. Littleton, & P. Light (Eds.) Learning with computers: Analysing productive interaction (pp. 79-101). London: Routledge.
22. Merriam, S. B (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
24. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Plato. (1990). The dialogues of Plato (trans: B. Jovett). Chicago, IL: Encyclopaedia Britannica.
26. Sahlström, F. (1999). Up the hill backwards: On interactional constraints and affordances for equity-constitution in the classrooms of the Swedish comprehensive school. Ph.D. thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
27. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
28. Stake, R. E. (1994). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236-247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
30. Zhu, E. (1998). Learning and mentoring in a distance learning course. In C. J. Bonk, & K. S. King (Eds.)Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse (pp. 233-259). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.