Testing our defences or defending our tests: the obstacles to performing security assessment references

Computer Fraud and Security

Volumn 2008, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 8-12

  Furnell, Steven ^a   Papadaki, Maria ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CRIME; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOFTWARE TESTING;

SECURITY ASSESSMENT;

SECURITY OF DATA;

EID: 43249083927     PISSN: 13613723     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1361-3723(08)70081-2     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. See Section 37 in Police and Justice Act 2006. 2006 Chapter 48. Available from: https://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2006/pdf/ukpga_20060048_en.pdf
2. CPS. 2008. Computer Misuse Act 1990 - Guidance. Crown Prosecution Service. http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/section12/chapter_s.pdf.
3. Blau J., 2007. "German antihacker law could backfire, critics warn", InfoWorld, 13 August 2007.
4. Furnell, S. and Bolakis, S. 2004. "Helping us to help ourselves: assessing administrators' use of security analysis tools", Network Security, February 2004, pp7-12.
5. Karakasiliotis A., Furnell S., and Papadaki M. "An assessment of end user vulnerability to phishing attacks". Journal of Information Warfare 6 1 (2007) 17-28
6. nd International Symposium on Human Aspects of Information Security & Assurance (HAISA 2008), Plymouth, UK, 9 July 2008.
7. Dodge R.C., Carver C., and Ferguson A.J. "Phishing for user security awareness". Computers & Security 26 1 (2007) 73-80
8. Case study described in Chapter 8 of Hackers Beware by Eric Cole. New Riders. ISBN 0735710090. pp290-291.