Helping us to help ourselves: Assessing administrators' use of security analysis tools

Network Security

Volumn 2004, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 7-12

  Furnell, Steven ^a   Bolakis, Stamatis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DATA PRIVACY; ELECTRONIC CRIME COUNTERMEASURES; NETWORK PROTOCOLS;

INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEMS; PASSWORD CRACKERS; SNIFFER DETECTORS;

SECURITY OF DATA;

EID: 1242308791     PISSN: 13534858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1353-4858(04)00035-2     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Symantec. 2003. Symantec Internet Security Threat Report - Vulnerability Trends. September 2003. http://ses.symantec.com/ITR.
2. SANS Institute. 2003. "The Twenty Most Critical Internet Security Vulnerabilities (Updated) - The Experts Consensus". Version 4.0, 8 October 2003. http://www.sans.org/top20/.
3. Bolakis, S. 2003. Security Analysis Tools - Do they make any difference? MSc Thesis. University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
4. Anonymous. 2002. Maximum Security: A Hacker's Guide to Protecting Your Internet Site and Network. Sams. ISBN 0672313413.
5. Johnston J., Eloff J.H.P., Labuschagne L. "Security and human computer interfaces", Computers & Security. 22:(8):2003;675-684.
6. Furnell S.M., Chiliarchaki P., Dowland P.S. "Security analysers: Administrator Assistants or Hacker Helpers?", Information Management and Computer Security. 9:(2):2001;93-101.