The incoherence argument: Reply to Schafer-Landau

Analysis

Volumn 61, Issue 271, 2001, Pages 254-266

  Smith, Michael ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43149120111     PISSN: 00032638     EISSN: 14678284     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8284.00303     Document Type: Note

References (12)

1. Copp, D. 1997. Belief, reason and motivation: Michael Smith's The Moral Problem. Ethics 108: 33-54
2. Dreier, J. 1996. Review of The Moral Problem. Mind 105: 363-67
3. Kennett, J. and M. Smith. 1994. Philosophy and common sense: the case of weakness of will. In Philosophy in Mind, ed. M. Michael and J. O'Leary Hawthorne, 141-57. Dordrecht: Kluwer Press
4. Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press
5. Pettit, P. and M. Smith. 1993. Practical unreason. Mind 102: 53-79
6. Sayre-McCord, G. 1997. The metaethical problem. Ethics 108: 55-83
7. Schafer-Landau, R. 1999. Moral judgement and normative reasons. Analysis 59: 33-40
8. Smith M. 1994. The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers
9. Smith M. 1995. Reply to Ingmar Persson's critical notice of The Moral Problem. Theoria 61: 159-81
10. Smith, M. 1996. Normative reasons and full rationality: reply to Swanton Analysis 56: 160-68
11. Smith, M. 1997. In defence of The Moral Problem. Ethics 108: 84-119
12. Smith, M. 1999. The definition of 'moral'. In Singer and His Critics, ed D. Jamieson. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers